skip to main content
10.1145/3583133.3590605acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

GP with Ranging-Binding Technique for Symbolic Regression

Published:24 July 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes a model-based genetic programming algorithm for symbolic regression, called the ranging-binding genetic programming algorithm (RBGP). The goal is to allow offspring to retain the superiority of their promising parents during evolution. Inspired by the concept of model building, RBGP makes use of syntactic information and semantics information in a program to capture the hidden patterns. When compared with GP-GOMEA, ellynGP, and gplearn, RBGP outperformed the others on average in the Penn machine learning benchmarks, RBGP achieving statistically significant improvements over all other methods on 44% of the problems.

References

  1. Peter A.N. Bosman and Dirk Thierens. 2012. Linkage Neighbors, Optimal Mixing and Forced Improvements in Genetic Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA) (GECCO '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 585--592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ping-Lin Chen, Chun-Jen Peng, Chang-Yi Lu, and Tian-Li Yu. 2017. Two-Edge Graphical Linkage Model for DSMGA-II. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (Berlin, Germany) (GECCO '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 745--752. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Vinícius Veloso De Melo. 2014. Kaizen Programming. In Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (GECCO '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 895--902. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Shih-Huan Hsu and Tian-Li Yu. 2015. Optimization by Pairwise Linkage Detection, Incremental Linkage Set, and Restricted / Back Mixing: DSMGA-II (GECCO '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 519--526. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. John R Koza. 1992. Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Krzysztof Krawiec. 2016. Program synthesis. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 1--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. William La Cava, Thomas Helmuth, Lee Spector, and Kourosh Danai. 2015. Genetic Programming with Epigenetic Local Search. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (Madrid, Spain) (GECCO '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1055--1062. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. William La Cava, Patryk Orzechowski, Bogdan Burlacu, Fabricio de Franca, Marco Virgolin, Ying Jin, Michael Kommenda, and Jason Moore. 2021. Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performance. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmarks, J. Vanschoren and S. Yeung (Eds.), Vol. 1. https://datasets-benchmarks-proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/file/c0c7c76d30bd3dcaefc96f40275bdc0a-Paper-round1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Quang Uy Nguyen, Xuan Hoai Nguyen, and Michael O'Neill. 2009. Semantic Aware Crossover for Genetic Programming: The Case for Real-Valued Function Regression. In Genetic Programming, Leonardo Vanneschi, Steven Gustafson, Alberto Moraglio, Ivanoe De Falco, and Marc Ebner (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 292--302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Quang Uy Nguyen, Michael O'Neill, Nguyen Hoai, Robert McKay, and Edgar López. 2009. Semantic Similarity Based Crossover in GP: The Case for Real-Valued Function Regression. 170--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Robert B. Leighton Richard P. Feynman and Matthew Sands. 2015. he Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. I: The New Millennium Edition: Mainly Mechanics, Radiation, and Heat.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Joseph D Romano, Trang T Le, William La Cava, John T Gregg, Daniel J Goldberg, Praneel Chakraborty, Natasha L Ray, Daniel Himmelstein, Weixuan Fu, and Jason H Moore. 2021. PMLB v1.0: an open source dataset collection for benchmarking machine learning methods. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00058v2 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Trevor Stephens. 2016. Genetic Programming in Python, with a scikit-learn inspired API: gplearn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Steven H. Strogatz. 2000. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Engineering. Westview Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dirk Thierens. 2010. The Linkage Tree Genetic Algorithm. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature: Part I (Kraków, Poland) (PPSN'10). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 264--273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dirk Thierens and Peter A.N. Bosman. 2011. Optimal Mixing Evolutionary Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (Dublin, Ireland) (GECCO '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 617--624. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Marco Virgolin, Tanja. Alderliesten, Cees Witteveen, and Peter. Bosman. 2020. Improving Model-Based Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression of Small Expressions. Evolutionary Computation 29 (06 2020), 1--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Jinghui Zhong, Liang Feng, Wentong Cai, and Yew Ong. 2018. Multifactorial Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression Problems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems PP (07 2018), 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. GP with Ranging-Binding Technique for Symbolic Regression

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '23 Companion: Proceedings of the Companion Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
      July 2023
      2519 pages
      ISBN:9798400701207
      DOI:10.1145/3583133

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 July 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)77
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader