skip to main content
article

Limited Effectiveness of IT/IS Investments in an Emerging Economy: Evidence from India and Implications

Published:07 February 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The business value of investments in information technology/information system (IT/IS) has been the subject of active research over several decades. Even though a plethora of similar studies analyzing the impact of promised IT/IS investments on firm performance exists, the results, largely inconclusive, mostly concentrate on the developed countries. In this backdrop, and with an expected manifold rise in IT/IS investments in India in the coming years, an assessment of the relationship between investments and firm performance can be noteworthy. The study explores this important issue by analyzing the impact of IT/IS investments on the firm's performance in India based on data of around 6500 IT/IS investments during 2000-2016. We deploy a series of univariate and multivariate analyses and complement those with several robustness tests. Our principal findings indicate that IT/IS investments on the average in India have been mostly unsuccessful in impacting firm performance positively, in line with "productivity paradox" phenomenon previously documented in the U.S. and other markets. We substantiate our principal results using several robustness tests. We offer several possible explanations of our results spanning across both IS as well as finance literature and discuss the implications of future investment prospects for firms. The results highlight the need for adoption of caution by firms operating in emerging economies like India while considering future IT/IS investment decisions. These suggestions are likely to serve as a good reference point in other emerging economies as well.

References

  1. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., & Ravindran, S. (2006). Value implications of investments in information technology. Management Science, 9(52), 1359--1376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Andrade Rojas, M., Kathuria, A., Khuntia, J., Saldanha, T., & Waegelein, J. (2015). Do CEO's long-term performance incentives induce IT investments? Theory, evidence, and industry contingencies. AMCIS 2015 Proceedings, 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aral, S., & Weill, P. (2007). IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: How resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organization Science, 18(5), 763--780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ayal, M., & Seidman, A. (2009). An empirical investigation of the value of integrating enterprise information systems: The case of medical imaging informatics. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(2), 43--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bagheri, M. M., Hamid, A., Rezaei, A., & Mardani, A. (2012). Relationship among information technology investment, firm performance, innovation and firm growth, case study: Largest Iranian manufacturers. International Journal of Fundamental Psychology & Social Sciences, 2(3), 57--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Banker, R. D., Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Luftman, J. (2011). CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 487--504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bardhan, I., Whitaker, J., & Mithas, S. (2006). Information technology, production process outsourcing, and manufacturing plant performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 13--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Spamann, H. (2010). The wages of failure: Executive compensation at Bear Stearns and Lehman 2000--2008. Yale Journal on Regulation, 27, 257--282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bharadwaj, A. S., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Konsynski, B. R. (1999). Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's q, . Management Science, 7(45), 1008--1024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bharadwaj, A. S., Keil, M., & Mähring, M. (2009). Effects of information technology failures on the market value of firms. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(2), 66--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bhardwaj, R. K., & Brooks, L. D. (1993). Dual betas from bull and bear markets: Reversal of the size effect. Journal of Financial Research, 16(4), 269- 283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bingi, P., Leff, L. G., Shipchandler, Z. E., & Rao, S. (2000). Critical IT implementation issues in developed and developing countries. Information Strategy: The Executive's Journal, 16(2), 25--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Blanchard, O., Rhee, C., & Summers, L. (1993). The stock market, profit, and investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(1), 115--136. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology: Review and assessment. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 67--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Brynjolfsson, E. & Hitt, L. M. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541--558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, M. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox: Computers are the catalyst for bigger changes. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of expectations and statistics. In The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda. (pp. 23--57). University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B. (2002). Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Science, 48(11), 1461- 1485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013). Information technology competencies, organizational agility, and firm performance: Enabling and facilitating roles. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 976--997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Chen, S., & Xie, Z. (2015). Is China's e-governance sustainable? Testing Solow IT productivity paradox in China's context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 96, 51--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Jin, J., Wang, L., & Chow, W. S. (2014). IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 326--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Colecchia, A., & Schreyer, P. (2002). ICT investment and economic growth in the 1990s: Is the United States a unique case? A comparative study of nine OECD countries. Review of Economic Dynamics, 5(2), 408--442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. D'Antoni, H. (2002). IT investments drive worker output. Information Week. https://www.informationweek.com/it-life/itinvestments- drive-worker-outputGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Dang, C., Li, Z. F., & Yang, C. (2018). Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. David, P. (1990). The dynamo and the computer: a historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review, 80(2), 355--361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. De Castro, J. O., & Uhlenbruck, K. (1997). Characteristics of privatization: Evidence from developed, less-developed and former communist countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(1), 123--143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Deb, S. G. (2018). Institutional investors and firm characteristics: New evidence from India. Research in International Business and Finance, 46, 30--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Deb, S. G., & Banerjee, P. (2018). Low leverage policy: A boon or bane for Indian shareholders. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 12(4), 489--507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Dedrick, J., Gurbaxani, V., & Kraemer, K. L. (2003). Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(1), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity scorematching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151--161.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Dehning, B., Richardson, V. J., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The value relevance of announcements of transformational information technology investments. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 637--656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Dewan, S., & Ren, F. (2011). Information technology and firm boundaries: Impact on firm risk and return performance. Information Systems Research, 22(2), 369--388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Dos Santos, B. L., Peffers, K. & Mauer, D. C. (1993). The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research, 4(1), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Dos Santos, B. L., Zheng, Z., Mookerjee, V. S., & Chen, H. (2012). Are new IT-enabled investment opportunities diminishing for firms? Information Systems Research, 23(2), 287--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Dumagan, J., Gill, G., & Ingram, C. (2003). Industrylevel effects of information technology use on overall productivity. In D. Evans (Ed.), Digital Economy 2003. US Department of Commerce.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Fabozzi, F. J., & Francis, J. C. (1979). Mutual fund systematic risk for bull and bear markets: An empirical examination. The Journal of Finance, 34(5), 1243--1250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Famá, R., & Barros, L. A. B. d. C. (2000). Q de Tobin e seu uso em finanças: aspectos metodológicos e conceituais (Caderno de Pesquisas em Administração da Universidade de São Paulo (FEA/USP), Issue.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Diebold Group. (1982). MIS telecommunications budgets and key indicators. The Diebold Group Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Diebold Group. (1984). MIS telecommunications budgets and key indicators. The Diebold Group Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Han, K., & Mithas, S. (2013). Information technology outsourcing and non-IT operating costs: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 315--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Han, S., & Ravichandran, T. (2006). Does IT impact firm innovativeness: An empirical examination of complementary and direct effects. AMCIS 2006 Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1990). Capital structure and informational role of debt. Journal of Finance, 45(2), 321--349.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251--1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Hayes, D. C., Hunton, J. E., & Reck, J. L. (2001). Market reaction to ERP implementation announcements. Journal of Information Systems, 15(1), 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Hendricks, K. B., Singhal, V. R., & Stratman, J. K. (2007). The impact of enterprise systems on corporate performance: A study of ERP, SCM, and CRM system implementations. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 65--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Henry-Nickie, M., Frimpong, K., & Sun, H. (2019, March 29). Trends in the information technology sector.Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/research/trends-inthe- information-technology-sector/ Henwood, D. (1998). Wall Street: how it works and for whom. Verso.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Hitt, L. M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 121--142. Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X. (2002). Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 71--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Im, K. S., Dow, K. E., & Grover, V. (2001). Research report: A reexamination of IT investment and the market value of the firm-An event study methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(1), 103--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323--329.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305--360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Ji, P., Yan, X., & Yu, G. (2020). The impact of information technology investment on enterprise financial performance in China. Chinese Management Studies, 14(3), 529--542.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Jorgenson, D. W. (1963). Capital theory and investment behavior. The American Economic Review, 53(2), 247--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Kim, W. S. (2003). New Trends of Globalization: Do We Need New Theories? Journal of International Business and Law, 2(1), 72--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Kobelsky, K. W., Richardson, V. J., Smith, R. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2008). Determinants and consequences of firm information technology budgets. The Accounting Review, 83(4), 957- 995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Kohli, R., Devaraj, S., & Ow., T. T. (2012). Does information technology investment influence a firms market value? A case of non-publicly traded healthcare firms. MIS Quarterly, 36(4), 1145- 1163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Krohmer, P., Lauterbach, R., & Calanog, V. (2009). The bright and dark side of staging: Investment performance and the varying motivations of private equity firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(9), 1597--1609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2019). Management information systems: Managing the digital firm (16th ed.). Pearson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Lauterbach, R., Welpe, I., Calanog, V., & Wahrenburg, M. (2007). Investment pressure effecting behaviour? The impact of fund inflows on staging and speed of capital allocation. In R. Lauterbach (Ed.), Essays in financial economics: Private equity and venture capital. Universität Frankfurt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Lee, J., & Bose, U. (2002). Operational linkage between diverse dimensions of information technology investments and multifaceted aspects of a firm's economic performance. Journal of Information Technology, 17(3), 119--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Lin, W. T., & Shao, B. B. M. (2000). Relative sizes of information technology investments and productive efficiency: Their linkage and empirical evidence. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Liu, T.-K., Chen, J.-R., Huang, C. J., & Yang, C.-H. (2014). Revisiting the productivity paradox: A semiparametric smooth coefficient approach based on evidence from Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 300--308. Mahmood, M. G., Mann, I., Dubrow, M., & Skidmore, J. (1998). Information technology investment and organization performance: A lagged data analysis. In M. Khosrowpour (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1998 Resources Management Association International Conference (pp. 219--225). Idea Group Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Masli, A., Richardson, V. J., Sanchez, J. M., & Smith, R. E. (2011). The business value of IT: A synthesis and framework of archival research. Journal of Information Systems, 25(2), 81--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. McLaughlin, R., Safieddine, A., & Vasudevan, G. K. (1996). The operating performance of seasoned equity issuers: Free cash flow and post-issue performance. Financial Management, 25(4), 41- 53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. McNally, W. J., & Smith, B. F. (2007). Long-run returns following open market share repurchases. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(3), 703--717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Mithas, S., Ali R. Tafti, Bardhan, I., & Goh, J. M. (2012). Information technology and firm profitability: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 205--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Mithas, S., & Rust, R. T. (2016). How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjectures and empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 223--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Mitra, S. (2005). Information technology as an enabler of growth in firms: An empirical assessment. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 279--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Ortner, J., Velthuis, L., & Wollscheid, D. (2017). Incentive systems for risky investment decisions under unknown preferences. Management Accounting Research, 36, 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Parent, M., & Reich, B. H. (2009). Governing information technology risk. California Management Review, 51(3), 134--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Phiri, D., & Weiguo, F. (2013). Information technology investment and firm performance in developing economies: The relationship between management practices and performance. In Zhang, Z., Zhang, R., Zhang, J. (Eds.). LISS 2012 (pp. 529--541). Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Pholphirul, P., & Bhatiasevi, V. (2016). IT investment and constraints in developing countries: Evidence from Thai manufacturers. Information Development, 32(2), 186--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Piatkowski, M. (2003). The contribution of ICT investment to economic growth and labor productivity in Poland 1995--2000 (TIGER Working Paper Series, No. 43).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Pinnuck, M. (2004). Stock preferences and derivative activities of Australian fund managers. Accounting & Finance, 44(1), 97--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Ray, G., Wu, D., & Konana, P. (2009). Competitive environment and the relationship between IT and vertical integration. Information Systems Research, 20(4), 585--603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718--804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Richardson, V. J., & Zmud, R. W. (2002). The value relevance of information technology investment announcements: Incorporating industry strategic IT role. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on IEEEGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Roach, S. (1987). America's technology dilemma: A profile of the information economy. Morgan Stanley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Roach, S. S. (1996, November-December). The hollow ring of the productivity revival. Harvard Business Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2008). Information technology investments in emerging economies. Information Technology for Development, 14(1), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2011). Information technology success factors and models in developing and emerging economies. Information Technology for Development, 17(3), 163--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Sabherwal, R., & Jeyaraj, A. (2015). Information technology impacts on firm performance: An Extension of Kohli and Devarag (2003). MIS Quarterly, 39(4), 809--836.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Sabherwal, R., Sabherwal, S., Havakhor, T., & Steelman, Z. (2019). How does strategic alignment affect firm performance? The roles of information technology investment and environmental uncertainty. MIS Quarterly, 43(2), 453--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Samuelson, J. F., & Stout, L. A. (2009, February 26). Are executives paid too much? The Wall Street Journal. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB12356174695567 8771 Saunders, A., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2016). Valuing information technology related intangible assets. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 83--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Scott, W. G. (1961). Organization theory: An overview and an appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 4(1), 7--26. Selling, T. I., & Stickney, C. P. (1989). The effects of business environment and strategy on a firm's rate of return on assets. Financial Analysts Journal, 45(1), 43--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Shin, N. (2006). The impact of information technology on the financial performance of diversified firms. Decision Support Systems, 41(4), 698--707. Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision making in business organizations. The American Economic Review, 69(4), 493--513.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Soh, C., & Markus, M. L. (1995). How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis. ICIS 1995 Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Stiroh, K. J. (2002). Information technology and the US productivity revival: What do the industry data say? The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1559--1576.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Stores, F. S. (2015). The relationship between information technology (IT) investment and firm's financial performance of public listed companies in Malaysia [Master's thesis, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia]. UTHM Instiutional Repository. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/42956119.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Strassmann, P. A. (1990). The business value of computers: An executive's guide. Information Economics Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Stratopoulos, T., & Dehning, B. (2000). Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Information & Management, 38(2), 103--117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Titus, M. A. (2007). Detecting selection bias, using propensity score matching, and estimating treatment effects: An application to the private returns to a master's degree. Research in Higher Education, 48(4), 487--521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  91. Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. Tobin, J., & Brainard, W. C. (1977). Asset market and the cost of market. In B. Balassa & R. Nelson (Eds.) Economic progress, private values and public policy: Essays in honor of William Fellner (pp. 235--262). North-Holland Publishing Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. Tucker, J. W. (2010). Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29, 31--57. Tukey, J. W. (1962). The future of data analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(1), 1--67 Uesugi, S. (2013). IT-enabled services. In S. Uesugi (Ed.) IT enabled services (pp. 1--17). Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Vaidyanathan, G., Devaraj, S., & D'Arcy, J. (2012). Does security impact e"procurement performance? Testing a model of direct and moderated effects. Decision Sciences, 43(3), 437--458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 307--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  96. Weill, P., & Broadbent, M. (1998). Leveraging the new infrastructure: How market leaders capitalize on information technology. Harvard Business Review Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. White, G. I., Sondhi, A. C., & Fried, D. (1994). The analysis and use of financial statements. Wiley. Wiggins, J. B. (1992). Betas in up and down markets. Financial Review, 27(1), 107--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Wu, C.-C., & Yang, T.-H. (2018). Insider trading and institutional holdings in seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 11(53), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. Zandi, F., & Tavana, M. (2011). A fuzzy goal programming model for strategic information technology investment assessment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(2), 172--196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
    ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 54, Issue 1
    February 2023
    121 pages
    ISSN:0095-0033
    EISSN:1532-0936
    DOI:10.1145/3583581
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2023 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 7 February 2023

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader