skip to main content
10.1145/3583668.3594575acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Brief Announcement: What Can We Compute in a Single Round of the Congested Clique?

Published:16 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

We show that any one-round algorithm that computes a minimum spanning tree (MST) in the unicast congested clique must use a link bandwidth of Ω(log3 n) bits in the worst case. Consequently, computing an MST under the standard assumption of O(log n)-size messages requires at least 2 rounds. This is the first round complexity lower bound in the unicast congested clique for a problem where the output size is small, i.e., O(n log n) bits. Our lower bound holds as long as every edge of the MST is output by an incident node. To the best of our knowledge, all prior lower bounds for the unicast congested clique either considered problems with large output sizes (e.g., subgraph enumeration) or required every node to learn the entire output.

References

  1. Kook Jin Ahn, Sudipto Guha, and Andrew McGregor. 2012. Analyzing graph structure via linear measurements. In Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete Algorithms. SIAM, 459--467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Baruch Awerbuch, Oded Goldreich, David Peleg, and Ronen Vainish. 1990. A Trade-Off between Information and Communication in Broadcast Protocols. J. ACM 37, 2 (1990), 238--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andrew Drucker, Fabian Kuhn, and Rotem Oshman. 2014. On the power of the congested clique model. In ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC '14, Paris, France, July 15--18, 2014. 367--376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mohsen Ghaffari and Krzysztof Nowicki. 2018. Congested Clique Algorithms for the Minimum Cut Problem. In PODC 2018. 357--366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mohsen Ghaffari and Merav Parter. 2016. MST in log-star rounds of congested clique. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. 19--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. James W Hegeman, Gopal Pandurangan, Sriram V Pemmaraju, Vivek B Sardeshmukh, and Michele Scquizzato. 2015. Toward optimal bounds in the congested clique: Graph connectivity and MST. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. 91--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Taisuke Izumi and François Le Gall. 2017. Triangle Finding and Listing in CONGEST Networks. In PODC 2017. 381--389.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tomasz Jurdzinski and Krzysztof Nowicki. 2017. Brief announcement: on connectivity in the broadcast congested clique. In DISC 2017. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum f. Informatik.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tomasz Jurdziński and Krzysztof Nowicki. 2018. MST in O(1) rounds of congested clique. In SODA 2018. SIAM, 2620--2632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Valerie King, Shay Kutten, and Mikkel Thorup. 2015. Construction and Impromptu Repair of an MST in a Distributed Network with o(m) Communication. In PODC 2015, Chryssis Georgiou and Paul G. Spirakis (Eds.). ACM, 71--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Christoph Lenzen. 2013. Optimal deterministic routing and sorting on the congested clique. In PODC 2013. 42--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zvi Lotker, Elan Pavlov, Boaz Patt-Shamir, and David Peleg. 2003. MST construction in O (log log n) communication rounds. In Proceedings of the fifteenth annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures. 94--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Pedro Montealegre, Sebastian Perez-Salazar, Ivan Rapaport, and Ioan Todinca. 2020. Graph reconstruction in the congested clique. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 113 (2020), 1--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Krzysztof Nowicki. 2021. A deterministic algorithm for the MST problem in constant rounds of congested clique. In STOC 2021, Samir Khuller and Virginia Vassilevska Williams (Eds.). ACM, 1154--1165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shreyas Pai, Gopal Pandurangan, Sriram V. Pemmaraju, and Peter Robinson. 2021. Can We Break Symmetry with o(m) Communication?. In PODC 2021: ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. ACM, 247--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Shreyas Pai and Sriram V Pemmaraju. 2020. Connectivity Lower Bounds in Broadcast Congested Clique. In 40th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gopal Pandurangan, Peter Robinson, and Michele Scquizzato. 2021. On the distributed complexity of large-scale graph computations. ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing (TOPC) 8, 2 (2021), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Peter Robinson. 2021. Being Fast Means Being Chatty: The Local Information Cost of Graph Spanners. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2021, January 10 -- 13, 2021. SIAM, 2105--2120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Huacheng Yu. 2021. Tight Distributed Sketching Lower Bound for Connectivity. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2021, Virtual Conference, January 10 -- 13, 2021. 1856--1873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Brief Announcement: What Can We Compute in a Single Round of the Congested Clique?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PODC '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing
      June 2023
      392 pages
      ISBN:9798400701214
      DOI:10.1145/3583668

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 June 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      PODC '23 Paper Acceptance Rate29of110submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate740of2,477submissions,30%

      Upcoming Conference

      PODC '24
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader