skip to main content
research-article

Towards Informative and Diverse Dialogue Systems Over Hierarchical Crowd Intelligence Knowledge Graph

Published:04 May 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Knowledge-enhanced dialogue systems aim at generating factually correct and coherent responses by reasoning over knowledge sources, which is a promising research trend. The truly harmonious human-agent dialogue systems need to conduct engaging conversations from three aspects as humans, namely (1) stating factual contents (e.g., records in Wikipedia), (2) conveying subjective and informative opinions about objects (e.g., user discussions on Twitter), and (3) impressing interlocutors with diverse expression styles (e.g., personalized expression habits). The existing knowledge base is a standardized and unified coding for factual knowledge, which could not portray the other two kinds of knowledge to make responses more informative and expressive diverse. To address this, we present CrowdDialog, a crowd intelligence knowledge-enhanced dialogue system, which takes advantage of “crowd intelligence knowledge” extracted from social media (with rich subjective descriptions and diversified expression styles) to promote the performance of dialogue systems. Firstly, to thoroughly mine and organize the crowd intelligence knowledge underlying large-scale and unstructured online contents, we elaborately design the Crowd Intelligence Knowledge Graph (CIKG) structure, including the domain commonsense subgraph, descriptive subgraph, and expressive subgraph. Secondly, to reasonably integrate heterogeneous crowd intelligence knowledge into responses while ensuring logicality and fluency, we propose the Gated Fusion with Dynamic Knowledge-Dependent (GFDD) model, which generates responses from the semantic and syntactic perspective with the context-aware knowledge gate and dynamic knowledge decoding. Finally, extensive experiments over both Chinese and English dialogue datasets demonstrate that our approach GFDD outperforms competitive baselines in terms of both automatic evaluation and human judgments. Besides, ablation studies indicate that the proposed CIKG has the potential to promote dialogue systems to generate fluent, informative, and diverse dialogue responses.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Artetxe Mikel and Schwenk Holger. 2019. Massively multilingual sentence embeddings for zero-shot cross-lingual transfer and beyond. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 7, 1 (2019), 597610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Bai Jiaqi, Yang Ze, Liang Xinnian, Wang Wei, and Li Zhoujun. 2021. Learning to copy coherent knowledge for response generation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 1253512543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Bast Hannah, Bäurle Florian, Buchhold Björn, and Haußmann Elmar. 2014. Easy access to the freebase dataset. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. 9598.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. [4] Bian Jiang, Liu Yandong, Agichtein Eugene, and Zha Hongyuan. 2008. Finding the right facts in the crowd: Factoid question answering over social media. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web. 467476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. [5] Blei David M., Ng Andrew Y., and Jordan Michael I.. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, Jan (2003), 9931022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Bollacker Kurt, Evans Colin, Paritosh Praveen, Sturge Tim, and Taylor Jamie. 2008. Freebase: A collaboratively created graph database for structuring human knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 12471250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Bordes Antoine, Usunier Nicolas, Garcia-Duran Alberto, Weston Jason, and Yakhnenko Oksana. 2013. Translating embeddings for modeling multi-relational data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, 1 (2013), 27872795.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Chang Pi-Chuan, Tseng Huihsin, Jurafsky Dan, and Manning Christopher D.. 2009. Discriminative reordering with Chinese grammatical relations features. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Syntax and Structure in Statistical Translation (SSST-3) at NAACL HLT 2009. 5159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Chen Xiuyi, Meng Fandong, Li Peng, Chen Feilong, Xu Shuang, Xu Bo, and Zhou Jie. 2020. Bridging the gap between prior and posterior knowledge selection for knowledge-grounded dialogue generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 34263437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Cho Kyunghyun, Merriënboer Bart van, Gulcehre Caglar, Bahdanau Dzmitry, Bougares Fethi, Schwenk Holger, and Bengio Yoshua. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 17241734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Clark Kevin, Luong Minh-Thang, Le Quoc V., and Manning Christopher D.. 2019. ELECTRA: Pre-training text encoders as discriminators rather than generators. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Dinan Emily, Roller Stephen, Shuster Kurt, Fan Angela, Auli Michael, and Weston Jason. 2018. Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-powered conversational agents. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Dozat Timothy and Manning Christopher D.. 2016. Deep biaffine attention for neural dependency parsing. arXiv:1611.01734. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01734.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Edlund Jens, Gustafson Joakim, Heldner Mattias, and Hjalmarsson Anna. 2008. Towards human-like spoken dialogue systems. Speech Communication 50, 8-9 (2008), 630645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. [15] Fong Terrence, Nourbakhsh Illah, and Dautenhahn Kerstin. 2003. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 3-4 (2003), 143166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Franklin Michael J., Kossmann Donald, Kraska Tim, Ramesh Sukriti, and Xin Reynold. 2011. CrowdDB: Answering queries with crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 6172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. [17] Guo Bin, Chen Huihui, Liu Yan, Chen Chao, Han Qi, and Yu Zhiwen. 2020. From crowdsourcing to crowdmining: Using implicit human intelligence for better understanding of crowdsourced data. World Wide Web 23, 2 (2020), 11011125.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Guo Bin, Wang Hao, Ding Yasan, Wu Wei, Hao Shaoyang, Sun Yueqi, and Yu Zhiwen. 2021. Conditional text generation for harmonious human-machine interaction. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 12, 2 (2021), 150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. [19] Guo Bin, Wang Zhu, Yu Zhiwen, Wang Yu, Yen Neil Y., Huang Runhe, and Zhou Xingshe. 2015. Mobile crowd sensing and computing: The review of an emerging human-powered sensing paradigm. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 48, 1 (2015), 131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. [20] Harb Jonathas G. D., Ebeling Régis, and Becker Karin. 2020. A framework to analyze the emotional reactions to mass violent events on Twitter and influential factors. Information Processing & Management 57, 6 (2020), 102372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. [21] Haveliwala Taher H.. 2003. Topic-sensitive pagerank: A context-sensitive ranking algorithm for web search. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15, 4 (2003), 784796.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Huang Xiao, Zhang Jingyuan, Li Dingcheng, and Li Ping. 2019. Knowledge graph embedding based question answering. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 105113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Jung Jaehun, Son Bokyung, and Lyu Sungwon. 2020. Attnio: Knowledge graph exploration with in-and-out attention flow for knowledge-grounded dialogue. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 34843497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. [24] Kazemi Ashkan, Pérez-Rosas Verónica, and Mihalcea Rada. 2020. Biased TextRank: Unsupervised graph-based content extraction. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 16421652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Kenton Jacob Devlin Ming-Wei Chang and Toutanova Lee Kristina. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT. 41714186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. [26] Kingma Diederik P. and Ba Jimmy. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Li Jiwei, Galley Michel, Brockett Chris, Spithourakis Georgios, Gao Jianfeng, and Dolan William B.. 2016. A persona-based neural conversation model. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 9941003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. [28] Li Jiwei, Monroe Will, Ritter Alan, Jurafsky Dan, Galley Michel, and Gao Jianfeng. 2016. Deep reinforcement learning for dialogue generation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 11921202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Li Lingyao, Bensi Michelle, Cui Qingbin, Baecher Gregory B., and Huang You. 2021. Social media crowdsourcing for rapid damage assessment following a sudden-onset natural hazard event. International Journal of Information Management 601 (2021), 102378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Li Peng, Li Wei, He Zhengyan, Wang Xuguang, Cao Ying, Zhou Jie, and Xu Wei. 2016. Dataset and neural recurrent sequence labeling model for open-domain factoid question answering. arXiv:1607.06275. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [31] Li Wei, Wu Wen-jun, Wang Huai-min, Cheng Xue-qi, Chen Hua-jun, Zhou Zhi-hua, and Ding Rong. 2017. Crowd intelligence in AI 2.0 era. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 18, 1 (2017), 1543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Li Zekang, Niu Cheng, Meng Fandong, Feng Yang, Li Qian, and Zhou Jie. 2019. Incremental transformer with deliberation decoder for document grounded conversations. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1221.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] Lin Xiexiong, Jian Weiyu, He Jianshan, Wang Taifeng, and Chu Wei. 2020. Generating informative conversational response using recurrent knowledge-interaction and knowledge-copy. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 4152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Liu Zeming, Wang Haifeng, Niu Zheng-Yu, Wu Hua, Che Wanxiang, and Liu Ting. 2020. Towards conversational recommendation over multi-type dialogs. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 10361049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Ma Yukun, Nguyen Khanh Linh, Xing Frank Z., and Cambria Erik. 2020. A survey on empathetic dialogue systems. Information Fusion 64, 1 (2020), 5070.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. [36] Meng Chuan, Ren Pengjie, Chen Zhumin, Sun Weiwei, Ren Zhaochun, Tu Zhaopeng, and Rijke Maarten de. 2020. Dukenet: A dual knowledge interaction network for knowledge-grounded conversation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 11511160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. [37] Mihalcea Rada and Tarau Paul. 2004. Textrank: Bringing order into text. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 404411.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. [38] Mikolov Tomas, Chen Kai, Corrado Greg, and Dean Jeffrey. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. [39] Moon Seungwhan, Shah Pararth, Kumar Anuj, and Subba Rajen. 2019. Opendialkg: Explainable conversational reasoning with attention-based walks over knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 845854.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Niu Liqiang, Dai Xinyu, Zhang Jianbing, and Chen Jiajun. 2015. Topic2Vec: Learning distributed representations of topics. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP). IEEE, 193196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. [41] Peng Shuke, Ji Feng, Lin Zehao, Cui Shaobo, Chen Haiqing, and Zhang Yin. 2020. Mtss: Learn from multiple domain teachers and become a multi-domain dialogue expert. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 86088615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. [42] Radford Alec, Narasimhan Karthik, Salimans Tim, Sutskever Ilya, et al. 2018. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. (2018). https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/273ced32c0d4588eb95b6986dc2c8147c/jonaskaiser.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. [43] Radford Alec, Wu Jeffrey, Child Rewon, Luan David, Amodei Dario, Sutskever Ilya, et al. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog 1, 8 (2019), 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. [44] Roller Stephen, Dinan Emily, Goyal Naman, Ju Da, Williamson Mary, Liu Yinhan, Xu Jing, Ott Myle, Smith Eric Michael, Boureau Y-Lan, et al. 2021. Recipes for building an open-domain chatbot. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume. 300325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. [45] See Abigail, Liu Peter J., and Manning Christopher D.. 2017. Get to the point: Summarization with pointer-generator networks. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 10731083.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. [46] Serban Iulian, Sordoni Alessandro, Bengio Yoshua, Courville Aaron, and Pineau Joelle. 2016. Building end-to-end dialogue systems using generative hierarchical neural network models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] Shin Hyejin, Shim WooChul, Moon Jiin, Seo Jae Woo, Lee Sol, and Hwang Yong Ho. 2020. Cybersecurity event detection with new and re-emerging words. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 665678.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. [48] Speer Robyn, Chin Joshua, and Havasi Catherine. 2017. Conceptnet 5.5: An open multilingual graph of general knowledge. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. [49] Sukhbaatar Sainbayar, Szlam Arthur, Weston Jason, and Fergus Rob. 2015. End-to-end memory networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2015, 1 (2015), 24402448.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. [50] Vaswani Ashish, Shazeer Noam, Parmar Niki, Uszkoreit Jakob, Jones Llion, Gomez Aidan N., Kaiser Łukasz, and Polosukhin Illia. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 59986008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. [51] Veličković Petar, Cucurull Guillem, Casanova Arantxa, Romero Adriana, Liò Pietro, and Bengio Yoshua. 2018. Graph attention networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. [52] Vinyals Oriol and Le Quoc. 2015. A neural conversational model. arXiv:1506.05869. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05869.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. [53] Wang Hao, Guo Bin, Wu Wei, Liu Sicong, and Yu Zhiwen. 2021. Towards information-rich, logical dialogue systems with knowledge-enhanced neural models. Neurocomputing 465, 1 (2021), 248264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. [54] Wang Hongwei, Zhang Fuzheng, Wang Jialin, Zhao Miao, Li Wenjie, Xie Xing, and Guo Minyi. 2018. Ripplenet: Propagating user preferences on the knowledge graph for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 417426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. [55] Wang Jian, Liu Junhao, Bi Wei, Liu Xiaojiang, He Kejing, Xu Ruifeng, and Yang Min. 2020. Improving knowledge-aware dialogue generation via knowledge base question answering. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 91699176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. [56] Wang Yida, Ke Pei, Zheng Yinhe, Huang Kaili, Jiang Yong, Zhu Xiaoyan, and Huang Minlie. 2020. A large-scale chinese short-text conversation dataset. In Proceedings of the CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. Springer, 91103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. [57] Wu Sixing, Li Ying, Wang Minghui, Zhang Dawei, Zhou Yang, and Wu Zhonghai. 2021. More is better: Enhancing open-domain dialogue generation via multi-source heterogeneous knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 22862300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. [58] Wu Sixing, Li Ying, Zhang Dawei, Zhou Yang, and Wu Zhonghai. 2020. Diverse and informative dialogue generation with context-specific commonsense knowledge awareness. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 58115820.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. [59] Wu Sixing, Li Ying, Zhang Dawei, Zhou Yang, and Wu Zhonghai. 2021. Topicka: Generating commonsense knowledge-aware dialogue responses towards the recommended topic fact. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. 37663772.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. [60] Wu Wenquan, Guo Zhen, Zhou Xiangyang, Wu Hua, Zhang Xiyuan, Lian Rongzhong, and Wang Haifeng. 2019. Proactive human-machine conversation with explicit conversation goal. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 37943804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. [61] Wu Xianhua and Guo Ji. 2021. Finding of urban rainstorm and waterlogging disasters based on microblogging data and the location-routing problem model of urban emergency logistics. In Proceedings of the Economic Impacts and Emergency Management of Disasters in China. Springer, 221258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Xia Fei. 2000. The part-of-speech tagging guidelines for the Penn Chinese Treebank (3.0). IRCS Technical Reports Series (2000), 38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. [63] Xiong Chenyan, Power Russell, and Callan Jamie. 2017. Explicit semantic ranking for academic search via knowledge graph embedding. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web. 12711279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. [64] Yu Wenhao, Zhu Chenguang, Li Zaitang, Hu Zhiting, Wang Qingyun, Ji Heng, and Jiang Meng. 2022. A survey of knowledge-enhanced text generation. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54, 11s (2022), 138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. [65] Zhang Houyu, Liu Zhenghao, Xiong Chenyan, and Liu Zhiyuan. 2020. Grounded conversation generation as guided traverses in commonsense knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 20312043.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. [66] Zhang Yizhe, Sun Siqi, Galley Michel, Chen Yen-Chun, Brockett Chris, Gao Xiang, Gao Jianfeng, Liu Jingjing, and Dolan William B.. 2020. DIALOGPT: Large-scale generative pre-training for conversational response generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. 270278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. [67] Zhao Shanyang. 2006. Humanoid social robots as a medium of communication. New Media & Society 8, 3 (2006), 401419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. [68] Zhao Xueliang, Wu Wei, Xu Can, Tao Chongyang, Zhao Dongyan, and Yan Rui. 2020. Knowledge-grounded dialogue generation with pre-trained language models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 33773390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. [69] Zhao Yaru, Cheng Bo, and Zhang Yingying. 2021. Knowledge-aware dialogue generation with hybrid attention (student abstract). In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 1595115952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. [70] Zhou Hao, Huang Minlie, Liu Yong, Chen Wei, and Zhu Xiaoyan. 2021. EARL: Informative knowledge-grounded conversation generation with entity-agnostic representation learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 23832395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. [71] Zhou Hao, Young Tom, Huang Minlie, Zhao Haizhou, Xu Jingfang, and Zhu Xiaoyan. 2018. Commonsense knowledge aware conversation generation with graph attention. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 46234629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. [72] Zhou Hao, Zheng Chujie, Huang Kaili, Huang Minlie, and Zhu Xiaoyan. 2020. KdConv: A Chinese multi-domain dialogue dataset towards multi-turn knowledge-driven conversation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 70987108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. [73] Zhou Kangyan, Prabhumoye Shrimai, and Black Alan W.. 2018. A dataset for document grounded conversations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 708713.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Towards Informative and Diverse Dialogue Systems Over Hierarchical Crowd Intelligence Knowledge Graph

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
          ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data  Volume 17, Issue 7
          August 2023
          319 pages
          ISSN:1556-4681
          EISSN:1556-472X
          DOI:10.1145/3589018
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 May 2023
          • Online AM: 13 February 2023
          • Accepted: 6 February 2023
          • Revised: 11 January 2023
          • Received: 20 December 2021
          Published in tkdd Volume 17, Issue 7

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)286
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        View Full Text

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format