skip to main content
10.1145/3583780.3614732acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

An AI-based Simulation and Optimization Framework for Logistic Systems

Published:21 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Improving logistics efficiency is a challenging task in logistic systems, since planning the vehicle routes highly relies on the changing traffic conditions and diverse demand scenarios. However, most existing approaches either neglect the dynamic traffic environment or adopt manually designed rules, which fails to efficiently find a high-quality routing strategy. In this paper, we present a novel artificial intelligence (AI) based framework for logistic systems. This framework can simulate the spatio-temporal traffic conditions to form a dynamic environment in a data-driven manner. Under such a simulated environment, it adopts deep reinforcement learning techniques to intelligently generate the optimized routing strategy. Meanwhile, we also design an interactive frontend to visualize the simulated environment and routing strategies, which help operators evaluate the task performance. We will showcase the results of AI-based simulation and optimization in our demonstration.

References

  1. Said Dabia, Stefan Ropke, Tom Van Woensel, and Ton De Kok. 2013. Branch and price for the time-dependent vehicle routing problem with time windows. Transportation science, Vol. 47, 3 (2013), 380--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lu Duan, Yang Zhan, Haoyuan Hu, Yu Gong, Jiangwen Wei, Xiaodong Zhang, and Yinghui Xu. 2020. Efficiently solving the practical vehicle routing problem: A novel joint learning approach. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 3054--3063.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Xiaomin Fang, Jizhou Huang, Fan Wang, Lingke Zeng, Haijin Liang, and Haifeng Wang. 2020. Constgat: Contextual spatial-temporal graph attention network for travel time estimation at baidu maps. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2697--2705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Tao-yang Fu and Wang-Chien Lee. 2019. Deepist: Deep image-based spatio-temporal network for travel time estimation. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 69--78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Maha Gmira, Michel Gendreau, Andrea Lodi, and Jean-Yves Potvin. 2021. Tabu search for the time-dependent vehicle routing problem with time windows on a road network. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 288, 1 (2021), 129--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Google. 2023. On-demand Rides and Deliveries Solution Documentation. https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/transportation-logistics/mobility.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hitachi. 2019. Hitachi Digital Solution for Logistics. https://www.hitachi.co.jp/New/cnews/month/2019/02/0228.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. F Hooshmand and SA MirHassani. 2019. Time dependent green VRP with alternative fuel powered vehicles. Energy Systems, Vol. 10, 3 (2019), 721--756.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Rabie Jaballah, Marjolein Veenstra, Leandro C Coelho, and Jacques Renaud. 2021. The time-dependent shortest path and vehicle routing problem. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, Vol. 59, 4 (2021), 592--622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Guangyin Jin, Huan Yan, Fuxian Li, Yong Li, and Jincai Huang. 2023. Dual Graph Convolution Architecture Search for Travel Time Estimation. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. 14, 4 (2023), 1--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Minsu Kim, Jinkyoo Park, et al. 2021. Learning collaborative policies to solve NP-hard routing problems. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 34 (2021), 10418--10430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wouter Kool, Herke Van Hoof, and Max Welling. 2018. Attention, learn to solve routing problems! arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08475 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Byoungjip Kim, Iljoo Yoon, Youngjune Gwon, and Seungjai Min. 2020. Pomo: Policy optimization with multiple optima for reinforcement learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 33 (2020), 21188--21198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Iljoo Yoon, Minah Park, Duwon Park, and Youngjune Gwon. 2021. Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 34 (2021), 5138--5149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Henry CW Lau, TM Chan, Wan Ting Tsui, and GTS Ho. 2009. Cost optimization of the supply chain network using genetic algorithms-Withdrawn. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jingwen Li, Liang Xin, Zhiguang Cao, Andrew Lim, Wen Song, and Jie Zhang. 2021. Heterogeneous attentions for solving pickup and delivery problem via deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 23, 3 (2021), 2306--2315.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Wuman Luo, Haoyu Tan, Lei Chen, and Lionel M Ni. 2013. Finding time period-based most frequent path in big trajectory data. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. 713--724.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Mahmood Rahmani, Erik Jenelius, and Haris N Koutsopoulos. 2013. Route travel time estimation using low-frequency floating car data. In 16th international ieee conference on intelligent transportation systems (itsc 2013). IEEE, 2292--2297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Dong Wang, Junbo Zhang, Wei Cao, Jian Li, and Yu Zheng. 2018. When will you arrive? Estimating travel time based on deep neural networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Zonghan Wu, Shirui Pan, Guodong Long, Jing Jiang, and Chengqi Zhang. 2019. Graph Wavenet for Deep Spatial-Temporal Graph Modeling (IJCAI'19). 1907--1913.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Huan Yan, Guangyin Jin, Deng Wang, Yue Liu, and Yong Li. 2022. Jointly Modeling Intersections and Road Segments for Travel Time Estimation via Dual Graph Convolutional Networks. In International Conference on Spatial Data and Intelligence. Springer, 19--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Zefang Zong, Meng Zheng, Yong Li, and Depeng Jin. 2022. MAPDP: Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning to Solve Pickup and Delivery Problems. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36. 9980--9988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An AI-based Simulation and Optimization Framework for Logistic Systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '23: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      October 2023
      5508 pages
      ISBN:9798400701245
      DOI:10.1145/3583780

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)136
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)32

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader