skip to main content
10.1145/3583780.3614750acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

NumJoin: Discovering Numeric Joinable Tables with Semantically Related Columns

Published:21 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Join discovery is a crucial part of exploration on data lakes. It often involves finding joinable tables that are semantically relevant. However, data lakes often contain numeric tables with unreliable column headers, and ID columns whose text names have been lost. Finding semantically relevant joins over numeric tables is a challenge. State-of-the-art describes join discovery using semantic similarity, but do not consider purely numeric tables. In this paper, we describe a system, NumJoin that includes two novel approaches for discovering joinable tables in a data lake: one that maps tables to knowledge graphs, and another that leverages numeric types and distributions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of NumJoin on a large data lake, including transportation data and finance data.

References

  1. Alex Bogatu, Alvaro A. A. Fernandes, Norman W. Paton, and Nikolaos Konstantinou. 2020. Dataset Discovery in Data Lakes. In 2020 IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). 709--720. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE48307.2020.00067Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Raul Castro Fernandez, Essam Mansour, Abdulhakim A. Qahtan, Ahmed Elmagarmid, Ihab Ilyas, Samuel Madden, Mourad Ouzzani, Michael Stonebraker, and Nan Tang. 2018. Seeping Semantics: Linking Datasets Using Word Embeddings for Data Discovery. In 2018 IEEE 34th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). 989--1000. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2018.00093Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nadiia Chepurko, Ryan Marcus, Emanuel Zgraggen, Raul Castro Fernandez, Tim Kraska, and David Karger. 2020. ARDA: Automatic Relational Data Augmentation for Machine Learning. Proc. VLDB Endow., Vol. 13, 9 (jun 2020), 1373--1387. https://doi.org/10.14778/3397230.3397235Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Yuyang Dong, Kunihiro Takeoka, Chuan Xiao, and Masafumi Oyamada. 2020. Efficient Joinable Table Discovery in Data Lakes: A High-Dimensional Similarity-Based Approach. CoRR, Vol. abs/2010.13273 (2020). showeprint[arXiv]2010.13273 https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.13273Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yuyang Dong, Chuan Xiao, Takuma Nozawa, Masafumi Enomoto, and Masafumi Oyamada. 2022. DeepJoin: Joinable Table Discovery with Pre-trained Language Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2212.07588Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mahdi Esmailoghli, Jorge-Arnulfo Quiané -Ruiz, and Ziawasch Abedjan. 2021a. MATE: Multi-Attribute Table Extraction. CoRR, Vol. abs/2110.00318 (2021). showeprint[arXiv]2110.00318 https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.00318Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Mahdi Esmailoghli, Jorge-Arnulfo Quiané-Ruiz, and Ziawasch Abedjan. 2021b. COCOA: COrrelation COefficient-Aware Data Augmentation. In EDBT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Grace Fan, Jin Wang, Yuliang Li, Dan Zhang, and Renée Miller. 2022. Semantics-aware Dataset Discovery from Data Lakes with Contextualized Column-based Representation Learning. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2210.01922Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Catherine Faron, Chiara Ghidini, Ahmad Alobaid, Emilia Kacprzak, Oscar Corcho, Catherina Faron, and Chiara Ghidini. 2021. Typology-Based Semantic Labeling of Numeric Tabular Data. Semant. Web, Vol. 12, 1 (jan 2021), 5--20. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-200397Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Aamod Khatiwada, Grace Fan, Roee Shraga, Zixuan Chen, Wolfgang Gatterbauer, Renée J. Miller, and Mirek Riedewald. 2022. SANTOS: Relationship-based Semantic Table Union Search. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2209.13589Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Udayan Khurana and Sainyam Galhotra. 2021. Semantic Concept Annotation for Tabular Data. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (Virtual Event, Queensland, Australia) (CIKM '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 844--853. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459637.3482295Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Udayan Khurana, Kavitha Srinivas, and Horst Samulowitz. 2022. A Survey on Semantics in Automated Data Science. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2205.08018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Peng Li, Xiang Cheng, Xu Chu, Yeye He, and Surajit Chaudhuri. 2021. Auto-FuzzyJoin: Auto-Program Fuzzy Similarity Joins Without Labeled Examples. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Management of Data (Virtual Event, China) (SIGMOD '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1064--1076. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448016.3452824Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Dan Ofer. 2019. DBPedia Classes: Hierarchical Taxonomy of Wikipedia article classes. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/danofer/dbpedia-classesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sahaana Suri, Ihab F. Ilyas, Christopher Ré, and Theodoros Rekatsinas. 2021. Ember: No-Code Context Enrichment via Similarity-Based Keyless Joins. Proc. VLDB Endow., Vol. 15, 3 (nov 2021), 699--712. https://doi.org/10.14778/3494124.3494149Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kunihiro Takeoka, Masafumi Oyamada, Shinji Nakadai, and Takeshi Okadome. 2019. Meimei: An Efficient Probabilistic Approach for Semantically Annotating Tables. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33, 01 (Jul. 2019), 281--288. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301281Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Erkang Zhu, Dong Deng, Fatemeh Nargesian, and Renée J. Miller. 2019. JOSIE: Overlap Set Similarity Search for Finding Joinable Tables in Data Lakes. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management of Data (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (SIGMOD '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 847--864. https://doi.org/10.1145/3299869.3300065Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Erkang Zhu, Yeye He, and Surajit Chaudhuri. 2017. Auto-Join: Joining Tables by Leveraging Transformations. Proc. VLDB Endow., Vol. 10, 10 (jun 2017), 1034--1045. https://doi.org/10.14778/3115404.3115409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Erkang Zhu, Fatemeh Nargesian, Ken Q. Pu, and Renée J. Miller. 2016. LSH Ensemble: Internet-Scale Domain Search. Proc. VLDB Endow., Vol. 9, 12 (aug 2016), 1185--1196. https://doi.org/10.14778/2994509.2994534Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. NumJoin: Discovering Numeric Joinable Tables with Semantically Related Columns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '23: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      October 2023
      5508 pages
      ISBN:9798400701245
      DOI:10.1145/3583780

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader