skip to main content
10.1145/3583780.3614846acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Disentangled Interest importance aware Knowledge Graph Neural Network for Fund Recommendation

Published:21 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

At present, people are gradually becoming aware of financial management and thus fund recommendation attracts more and more attention to help them find suitable funds quickly. As a user usually takes many factors (e.g., fund theme, fund manager) into account when investing a fund and the fund usually consists of a substantial collection of investments, effectively modeling multi-interest representations is more crucial for personalized fund recommendation than the traditional goods recommendation. However, existing multi-interest methods are largely sub-optimal for fund recommendation, since they ignore financial domain knowledge and diverse fund investment intentions. In this work, we propose a Disentangled Interest importance aware Knowledge Graph Neural Network (DIKGNN) for personalized fund recommendation on FinTech platforms. In particular, we restrict the multiple intent spaces by introducing the attribute nodes from the fund knowledge graph as the minimum intent modeling unit to utilize financial domain knowledge and provide interpretability. In the intent space, we define disentangled intent representations, equipped with intent importance distributions to describe the diverse fund investment intentions. Then we design a new neighbor aggregation mechanism with the learned intent importance distribution upon the interaction graph and knowledge graph to collect multi-intent information. Furthermore, we leverage micro independence and macro balance constraints on the representations and distributions respectively to encourage intent independence and diversity. The extensive experiments on public recommendation benchmarks demonstrate that DIKGNN can achieve substantial improvement over state-of-the-art methods. Our proposed model is also evaluated over one real-world industrial fund dataset from a FinTech platform and has been deployed online.

References

  1. Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2016. Layer normalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06450 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Yixin Cao, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Zikun Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Unifying knowledge graph learning and recommendation: Towards a better understanding of user preferences. In The world wide web conference. 151--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yukuo Cen, Jianwei Zhang, Xu Zou, Chang Zhou, Hongxia Yang, and Jie Tang. 2020. Controllable multi-interest framework for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2942--2951.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Yi-Ching Chou, Chiao-Ting Chen, and Szu-Hao Huang. 2022. Modeling behavior sequence for personalized fund recommendation with graphical deep collaborative filtering. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 192 (2022), 116311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Imre Csiszár, Paul C Shields, et al. 2004. Information theory and statistics: A tutorial. Foundations and Trends® in Communications and Information Theory, Vol. 1, 4 (2004), 417--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jingwei Guo, Kaizhu Huang, Xinping Yi, and Rui Zhang. 2022. LGD-GCN: Local and Global Disentangled Graph Convolutional Networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (2022), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3195336Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Xiangnan He, Tao Chen, Min-Yen Kan, and Xiao Chen. 2015. Trirank: Review-aware explainable recommendation by modeling aspects. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM CIKM. 1661--1670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Xiangnan He and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural factorization machines for sparse predictive analytics. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 355--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval. 639--648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Claire Yurong Hong, Xiaomeng Lu, and Jun Pan. 2019. FinTech platforms and mutual fund distribution. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pei-Ying Hsu, Chiao-Ting Chen, Chin Chou, and Szu-Hao Huang. 2022. Explainable mutual fund recommendation system developed based on knowledge graph embeddings. Applied Intelligence (2022), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Binbin Hu, Chuan Shi, Wayne Xin Zhao, and Philip S Yu. 2018. Leveraging meta-path based context for top-n recommendation with a neural co-attention model. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 1531--1540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Yehuda Koren, Robert Bell, and Chris Volinsky. 2009. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, Vol. 42, 8 (2009), 30--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K Krishna and M Narasimha Murty. 1999. Genetic K-means algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), Vol. 29, 3 (1999), 433--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Meelis Kull, Miquel Perello Nieto, Markus K"angsepp, Telmo Silva Filho, Hao Song, and Peter Flach. 2019. Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multi-class probabilities with dirichlet calibration. Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 32 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chao Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Mengmeng Wu, Yuchi Xu, Huan Zhao, Pipei Huang, Guoliang Kang, Qiwei Chen, Wei Li, and Dik Lun Lee. 2019. Multi-interest network with dynamic routing for recommendation at Tmall. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM CIKM. 2615--2623.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yang Liu, and Xuan Zhu. 2015. Learning entity and relation embeddings for knowledge graph completion. In Twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Francesco Locatello, Stefan Bauer, Mario Lucic, Gunnar Raetsch, Sylvain Gelly, Bernhard Schölkopf, and Olivier Bachem. 2019. Challenging common assumptions in the unsupervised learning of disentangled representations. In international conference on machine learning. PMLR, 4114--4124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jianxin Ma, Peng Cui, Kun Kuang, Xin Wang, and Wenwu Zhu. 2019. Disentangled graph convolutional networks. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 4212--4221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Andrew L Maas, Awni Y Hannun, Andrew Y Ng, et al. 2013. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In Proc. icml, Vol. 30. 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Simon J Mason and Nicholas E Graham. 2002. Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: Statistical significance and interpretation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society: A journal of the atmospheric sciences, applied meteorology and physical oceanography, Vol. 128, 584 (2002), 2145--2166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Steffen Rendle. 2012. Factorization machines with libfm. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), Vol. 3, 3 (2012), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2009. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 452--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Sara Sabour, Nicholas Frosst, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2017. Dynamic routing between capsules. Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 30 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J Ben Schafer, Dan Frankowski, Jon Herlocker, and Shilad Sen. 2007. Collaborative filtering recommender systems. In The adaptive web. Springer, 291--324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Xiao Sha, Zhu Sun, and Jie Zhang. 2019. Attentive Knowledge Graph Embedding for Personalized Recommendation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.08288 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Bonnie J Strait and T Gregory Dewey. 1996. The Shannon information entropy of protein sequences. Biophysical journal, Vol. 71, 1 (1996), 148--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Zhu Sun, Jie Yang, Jie Zhang, Alessandro Bozzon, Long-Kai Huang, and Chi Xu. 2018. Recurrent knowledge graph embedding for effective recommendation. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on recommender systems. 297--305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Gábor J. Székely. 2007. Measuring and testing dependence by correlation of distances. The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 35, 6 (Dec. 2007), 2769--2794. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053607000000505 Mathematical Reviews number (MathSciNet): MR2382665; Zentralblatt MATH identifier: 1129.62059.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Qiaoyu Tan, Jianwei Zhang, Jiangchao Yao, Ninghao Liu, Jingren Zhou, Hongxia Yang, and Xia Hu. 2021. Sparse-interest network for sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 598--606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ke Tu, Peng Cui, Daixin Wang, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jun Zhou, Yuan Qi, and Wenwu Zhu. 2021. Conditional graph attention networks for distilling and refining knowledge graphs in recommendation. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM CIKM. 1834--1843.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Petar Velivc ković, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Liò, and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Graph Attention Networks. International Conference on Learning Representations (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Chenyang Wang, Min Zhang, Weizhi Ma, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. 2020b. Make it a chorus: knowledge-and time-aware item modeling for sequential recommendation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval. 109--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Hongwei Wang, Fuzheng Zhang, Jialin Wang, Miao Zhao, Wenjie Li, Xing Xie, and Minyi Guo. 2018. Ripplenet: Propagating user preferences on the knowledge graph for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. 417--426.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Hongwei Wang, Fuzheng Zhang, Miao Zhao, Wenjie Li, Xing Xie, and Minyi Guo. 2019d. Multi-task feature learning for knowledge graph enhanced recommendation. In The world wide web conference. 2000--2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Hongwei Wang, Miao Zhao, Xing Xie, Wenjie Li, and Minyi Guo. 2019 e. Knowledge graph convolutional networks for recommender systems. In The world wide web conference. 3307--3313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Yixin Cao, Meng Liu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019a. Kgat: Knowledge graph attention network for recommendation. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD. 950--958.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Meng Wang, Fuli Feng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019b. Neural graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 42nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval. 165--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Xiang Wang, Tinglin Huang, Dingxian Wang, Yancheng Yuan, Zhenguang Liu, Xiangnan He, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Learning intents behind interactions with knowledge graph for recommendation. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021. 878--887.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Xiang Wang, Hongye Jin, An Zhang, Xiangnan He, Tong Xu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2020a. Disentangled graph collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 1001--1010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Xiang Wang, Dingxian Wang, Canran Xu, Xiangnan He, Yixin Cao, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019c. Explainable reasoning over knowledge graphs for recommendation. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 33. 5329--5336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Zhen Wang, Jianwen Zhang, Jianlin Feng, and Zheng Chen. 2014. Knowledge graph embedding by translating on hyperplanes. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Junkang Wu, Wentao Shi, Xuezhi Cao, Jiawei Chen, Wenqiang Lei, Fuzheng Zhang, Wei Wu, and Xiangnan He. 2021. DisenKGAT: knowledge graph embedding with disentangled graph attention network. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2140--2149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Hong-Jian Xue, Xinyu Dai, Jianbing Zhang, Shujian Huang, and Jiajun Chen. 2017. Deep matrix factorization models for recommender systems.. In IJCAI, Vol. 17. Melbourne, Australia, 3203--3209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Rex Ying, Ruining He, Kaifeng Chen, Pong Eksombatchai, William L Hamilton, and Jure Leskovec. 2018. Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 974--983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Xiao Yu, Xiang Ren, Yizhou Sun, Quanquan Gu, Bradley Sturt, Urvashi Khandelwal, Brandon Norick, and Jiawei Han. 2014. Personalized entity recommendation: A heterogeneous information network approach. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. 283--292.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Fuzheng Zhang, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Defu Lian, Xing Xie, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2016. Collaborative knowledge base embedding for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD. 353--362.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Disentangled Interest importance aware Knowledge Graph Neural Network for Fund Recommendation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '23: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      October 2023
      5508 pages
      ISBN:9798400701245
      DOI:10.1145/3583780

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)208
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)47

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader