Jérémy Wambecke
ABSTRACT
Visualization is an essential tool for exploring, understanding and presenting data. However, its use is limited by knowledge and tools. Novice users in visualization do not always know which visualization to choose for their data. The realization of a visualization with specific tools is often long and complex. In this article we present Catalogue Visu, an application allowing the free and fast realization of visualizations. Our main contribution is the design of the choice of the visualization type, which allows any user to choose an appropriate visualization for his needs. This method, the heart of Catalogue Visu, is iteratively validated by three user studies. Catalog Visu is accessible online and in permanent evolution, and is already used internally as a prototyping tool.
- Hanene Azzag, Fabien Picarougne, Christiane Guinot, and Gilles Venturini. 2006. Vrminer: A tool for multimedia database mining with virtual reality. In Processing and Managing Complex Data for Decision Support. IGI Global, 318–339.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jacques Bertin and M Barbut. 1967. Sémiologie Graphique. Les diagrammes, les réseaux, les cartes.Google Scholar
- Fatma Bouali, Abdelheq Et-tahir Guettala, and Gilles Venturini. 2015. VizAssist: an interactive user assistant for visual data mining. The Visual Computer 32 (05 2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-015-1132-9Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sylvain Bouveret, Renaud Blanch, Antoinette Baujard, François Durand, Herrade Igersheim, Jérôme Lang, Annick Laruelle, Jean-François Laslier, Isabelle Lebon, and Vincent Merlin. 2019. Voter Autrement 2017 - In Situ Experiment. (2019), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3548573Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stuart Card. 2002. Information Visualization. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA, 544–582.Google Scholar
- Stuart Card, Jock Mackinlay, and Ben Shneiderman. 1999. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision To Think. Journal Abbreviation: Information Visualization - IVS Publication Title: Information Visualization - IVS.Google Scholar
- Remco Chang, Tera Marie Green, William Ribarsky, and et al. 2009. Defining Insight for Visual Analytics.Google Scholar
- Yang Chen, Jing Yang, and William Ribarsky. 2009. Toward effective insight management in visual analytics systems. In 2009 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium. IEEE, 49–56.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, 2015. Characterizing visualization insights from quantified selfers’ personal data presentations. IEEE computer graphics and applications 35, 4 (2015), 28–37.Google Scholar
- Sarah Goodwin, Jason Dykes, Sara Jones, Iain Dillingham, Graham Dove, Alison Duffy, Alexander Kachkaev, Aidan Slingsby, and Jo Wood. 2013. Creative User-Centered Visualization Design for Energy Analysts and Modelers. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2516–2525. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.145Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kyle Wm. Hall, Anthony Kouroupis, Anastasia Bezerianos, Danielle Albers Szafir, and Christopher Collins. 2022. Professional Differences: A Comparative Study of Visualization Task Performance and Spatial Ability Across Disciplines. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 1 (Jan. 2022), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114805Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alaul Islam, Anastasia Bezerianos, Bongshin Lee, Tanja Blascheck, and Petra Isenberg. 2020. Visualizing Information on Watch Faces: A Survey with Smartwatch Users. In 2020 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). 156–160. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00038Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pawandeep Kaur and Michael Owonibi. 2017. A review on visualization recommendation strategies. In International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications, Vol. 4. SCITEPRESS, 266–273.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alicia Key, Bill Howe, Daniel Perry, and Cecilia Aragon. 2012. Vizdeck: self-organizing dashboards for visual analytics. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 681–684.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ian Li, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2012. Using Context to Reveal Factors That Affect Physical Activity. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 1, Article 7 (may 2012), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2147783.2147790Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhengliang Liu, R. Crouser, and Alvitta Ottley. 2020. Survey on Individual Differences in Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 39 (06 2020), 693–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14033Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ivan Logre and Anne-Marie Déry-Pinna. 2018. MDE in Support of Visualization Systems Design: a Multi-Staged Approach Tailored for Multiple Roles. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, EICS (2018), 1–17.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jock Mackinlay. 1986. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. Acm Transactions On Graphics (Tog) 5, 2 (1986), 110–141.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eamonn James Maguire. 2014. Systematising glyph design for visualization. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
- Belgin Mutlu, Eduardo Veas, and Christoph Trattner. 2016. Vizrec: Recommending personalized visualizations. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 6, 4 (2016), 1–39.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. North. 2006. Toward measuring visualization insight. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26, 3 (May 2006), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2006.70Google ScholarDigital Library
- Catherine Plaisant, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Georges Grinstein. 2008. Promoting Insight-Based Evaluation of Visualizations: From Contest to Benchmark Repository. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14, 1 (Jan. 2008), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70412 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Severino Ribecca. 2013. DataVizCatalog visual function taxonomy. https://datavizcatalogue.com/search.html. Accessed: 2020-09-29.Google Scholar
- P. Saraiya, C. North, and K. Duca. 2005. An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 11, 4 (July 2005), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2005.53 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hans-Jörg Schulz, Thomas Nocke, Magnus Heitzler, and Heidrun Schumann. 2013. A design space of visualization tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2366–2375.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben Shneiderman. 1996. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings 1996 IEEE symposium on visual languages. IEEE, 336–343.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Melanie Tory and Torsten Moller. 2004. Rethinking visualization: A high-level taxonomy. In IEEE Symposium on information visualization. IEEE, 151–158.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrea Vázquez-Ingelmo, Francisco J García-Peñalvo, and Roberto Therón. 2019. Capturing high-level requirements of information dashboards’ components through meta-modeling. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. 815–821.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fernanda B Viegas, Martin Wattenberg, Frank Van Ham, Jesse Kriss, and Matt McKeon. 2007. Manyeyes: a site for visualization at internet scale. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 13, 6 (2007), 1121–1128.Google Scholar
- Kanit Wongsuphasawat, Dominik Moritz, Anushka Anand, Jock Mackinlay, Bill Howe, and Jeffrey Heer. 2015. Voyager: Exploratory analysis via faceted browsing of visualization recommendations. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 22, 1 (2015), 649–658.Google Scholar
- Angela Zoss. 2017. Data visualization: visualization types. Duke Uni (2017). https://guides.library.duke.edu/datavis/vis_typesGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Catalogue Visu: a Tool for Fast Visualization Prototyping
Recommendations
Designing a personal information visualization tool
NordiCHI '10: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending BoundariesInteracting with computers has become part of our daily lives. This interaction results in large amounts of personal information, spread throughout places and applications. As a consequence, it is quite difficult to get an overall view of all our ...
Fast cutaway visualization of sub-terrain tubular networks
Highlights- Cutaways can be applied to structures rendered with procedural billboards.
- ...
Graphical abstractDisplay Omitted
AbstractThis paper proposes a context-preserving 3D visualization technique for interactive view- and distance-dependent cutaway visualization that reveals the subsurface urban infrastructure network. The infrastructure itself is displayed ...
Comments