skip to main content
10.1145/3584202.3584302acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicfndsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From Simulation to Digital Twins, the Case of Internet of Things Research and Tools

Published:09 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The digitalisation of the environment surrounding human beings in their daily life is a major challenge facing today’s technological progress. Building digital replicas of humans and systems help us to understand our environment, to anticipate its variations and to better explain its behaviour. Research in digital twins is continuously developing due to the various benefits it offers. This paper describes how the simulation and modelling community is switching towards digital twins using smart cities as a use case scenario. It also reviews the common digital twin-enabling tools used in today’s research. Finally, the key research trends, challenges and future directions are given.

References

  1. Abdelrahman Abuarqoub, Mohammad Hammoudeh, Fayez Alfayez, Omar Aldabbas, and SY Yurish. 2016. A survey on wireless sensor networks simulation tools and testbeds. Sensors, transducers, signal condi-tioning and wireless sensors networks advances in sensors: reviews 3, 14 (2016), 283–302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Steve Agland. 2002. Crowd Simulation: A Distributed Cognitive Model. Crowd Simulation (2002), 37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bounceur Ahcène, Marc Olivier, Lounis Massinissa, Soler Julien, Clavier Laurent, Combeau Pierre, Vauzelle Rodolphe, Lagadec Loic, Euler Reinhardt, Madanin Bezoui, and Manzoni Pietro. 2018. Cupcarbon-lab: An iot emulator. In 15th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2018.8319313Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. R. Al-Ali, Ragini Gupta, Tasneem Zaman Batool, Taha Landolsi, Fadi Aloul, and Ahmad Al Nabulsi. 2020. Digital Twin Conceptual Model within the Context of Internet of Things. Future Internet 12, 10 (Sept. 2020), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12100163Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shadi Al-Sarawi, Mohammed Anbar, Kamal Alieyan, and Mahmood Alzubaidi. 2017. Internet of Things (IoT) Communication Protocols: Review. In 2017 8th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT). IEEE, Amman, Jordan, 685–690. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITECH.2017.8079928Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Mohammad Al-Zinati and Rym Z Wenkstern. [n. d.]. An Agent-Based Self-Organizing Traffic Environment for Urban Evacuations (Extended Abstract). ([n. d.]), 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. T Alsbouí, Mohammad Hammoudeh, Zuhair Bandar, and Andy Nisbet. 2011. An overview and classification of approaches to information extraction in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (SENSORCOMM’11), Vol. 255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Di An and YangQuan Chen. 2021. Digital Twin Enabled Methane Emission Abatement Using Networked Mobile Sensing and Mobile Actuation. In 2021 IEEE 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI). IEEE, Beijing, China, 354–357. https://doi.org/10.1109/DTPI52967.2021.9540133Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kakali Basak, Seth N. Hetu, ZheminLi, Carlos Lima Azevedo, Harish Loganathan, Tomer Toledo, RunminXu, YanXu, Li-ShiuanPeh, and Moshe Ben-Akiva. 2013. Modeling Reaction Time within a Traffic Simulation Model. In 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013). IEEE, The Hague, Netherlands, 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2013.6728249Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Michael Behrisch, Laura Bieker, Jakob Erdmann, and Daniel Krajzewicz. [n. d.]. SUMO – Simulation of Urban MObility. ([n. d.]), 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Moshe Ben-Akiva, Haris N. Koutsopoulos, Tomer Toledo, Qi Yang, Charisma F. Choudhury, Constantinos Antoniou, and Ramachandran Balakrishna. 2010. Traffic Simulation with MITSIMLab. In Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation, Jaume Barceló (Ed.). Vol. 145. Springer New York, New York, NY, 233–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6142-6_6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Benjamin Boisson, Guillaume Combette, Dimitri Lajou, Victor Lutfalla, Octave Mariotti, Raphaël Monat, Etienne Moutot, Johanna Seif, and Pijus Simonaitis. [n. d.]. Final Report, Blend’it pro Ject. ([n. d.]), 17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ahcene Bounceur, Laurent Clavier, Pierre Combeau, Olivier Marc, Rodolphe Vauzelle, Arnaud Masserann, Julien Soler, Reinhardt Euler, Taha Alwajeeh, Vyas Devendra, Umber Noreen, Emilie Soret, and Massinissa Lounis. 2018. CupCarbon: A New Platform for the Design, Simulation and 2D/3D Visualization of Radio Propagation and Interferences in IoT Networks. In 2018 15th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC). IEEE, Las Vegas, NV, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2018.8319179Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gordon D. B. Cameron and Gordon I. D. Duncan. 1996. PARAMICS?Parallel Microscopic Simulation of Road Traffic. The Journal of Supercomputing 10, 1 (1996), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128098Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. P. Centorrino, A. Corbetta, E. Cristiani, and E. Onofri. 2021. Managing Crowded Museums: Visitors Flow Measurement, Analysis, Modeling, and Optimization. Journal of Computational Science 53 (July 2021), 101357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2021.101357Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Chiara Colombaroni, Gaetano Fusco, and Andrea Gemma. [n. d.]. Optimization of Traffic Signals on Urban Arteries through a Platoon- Based Simulation Model. Modelling and Simulation ([n. d.]), 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Davide Conzon, Thomas Bolognesi, Paolo Brizzi, Antonio Lotito, Riccardo Tomasi, and Maurizio A. Spirito. 2012. The VIRTUS Middleware: An XMPP Based Architecture for Secure IoT Communications. In 2012 21st International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN). IEEE, Munich, Germany, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2012.6289309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Riddhi Dave, Siddhi Dave, and Hemal Thakkar. 2020. Digital Twins: Current Problems in Smart City and Recommendations for Future Technology. 07, 05 (2020), 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Denise de Oliveira, Ana L C Bazzan, Luis Nunes, Rosaldo Rossetti, and Eugenio de Oliveira. [n. d.]. Reinforcement Learning-based Control of Traffic Lights in Non-stationary Environments: A Case Study in a Microscopic Simulator. ([n. d.]), 13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Felipe de Souza, Omer Verbas, and Joshua Auld. 2019. Mesoscopic Traffic Flow Model for Agent-Based Simulation. Procedia Computer Science 151 (2019), 858–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.118Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. Dimitrov and D. Petrova-Antonova. 2021. 3D CITY MODEL AS A FIRST STEP TOWARDS DIGITAL TWIN OF SOFIA CITY. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLIII-B4-2021 (June 2021), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B4-2021-23-2021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Özgür Doğan, Oğuzhan Şahi̇n, and Enis Karaarslan. 2021. Digital Twin Based Disaster Management System Proposal: DT-DMS. Journal of Emerging Computer Technologies 1, 2 (Dec. 2021), 25–30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Taner Eşme. [n. d.]. Delivering Smart City Experience. ([n. d.]), 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Bo Fan, Yuan Wu, Zhengbing He, Yanyan Chen, Tony Q.S. Quek, and Cheng-Zhong Xu. 2021. Digital Twin Empowered Mobile Edge Computing for Intelligent Vehicular Lane-Changing. IEEE Network 35, 6 (Nov. 2021), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.201.2000768Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Laith Farhan, Laith Alzubaidi, Mohamed Abdulsalam, Ali J Abboud, Mohammad Hammoudeh, and Rupak Kharel. 2018. An efficient data packet scheduling scheme for Internet of Things networks. In 2018 1st International Scientific Conference of Engineering Sciences-3rd Scientific Conference of Engineering Science (ISCES). IEEE, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. David N. Ford and Charles M. Wolf. 2020. Smart Cities with Digital Twin Systems for Disaster Management. Journal of Management in Engineering 36, 4 (July 2020), 04020027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000779Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Aidan Fuller, Zhong Fan, Charles Day, and Chris Barlow. 2020. Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 108952–108971. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2998358Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Mark A. Gromski and Kai Matthes. 2011. Simulation in Advanced Endoscopy: State of the Art and the next Generation. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 13, 3 (July 2011), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tgie.2011.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Maxime Gueriau, Romain Billot, Salima Hassas, Frederic Armetta, and Nour-Eddin El Faouzi. 2014. An Extension of MovSim for Multi-Agent Cooperative Vehicles Modeling. In 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE). IEEE, Vienna, Austria, 859–860. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVE.2014.7297673Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. I. Alihan Hadimlioglu and Scott A. King. 2019. City Maker: Reconstruction of Cities from OpenStreetMap Data for Environmental Visualization and Simulations. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8, 7 (July 2019), 298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8070298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Mohammad Hammoudeh and Mounir Arioua. 2018. Sensors and actuators in Smart Cities., 8 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohammad Hammoudeh, Gregory Epiphaniou, Sana Belguith, Devrim Unal, Bamidele Adebisi, Thar Baker, ASM Kayes, and Paul Watters. 2020. A service-oriented approach for sensing in the Internet of Things: intelligent transportation systems and privacy use cases. IEEE Sensors Journal 21, 14 (2020), 15753–15761.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Manuel Herrera, Sukumar Natarajan, David A Coley, Tristan Kershaw, Alfonso P Ramallo-González, Matthew Eames, Daniel Fosas, and Michael Wood. 2017. A Review of Current and Future Weather Data for Building Simulation. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 38, 5 (Sept. 2017), 602–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624417705937Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Michal Jakob and Matthew P Johnson. [n. d.]. AgentPolis: Towards a Platform for Fully Agent-based Modeling of Multi-Modal Transportation. ([n. d.]), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Jan Kyselý and Martin Dubrovský. 2005. Simulation of Extreme Temperature Events by a Stochastic Weather Generator: Effects of Interdiurnal and Interannual Variability Reproduction: SIMULATION OF EXTREME TEMPERATURE EVENTS BY STOCHASTIC WEATHER GENERATORS. International Journal of Climatology 25, 2 (Feb. 2005), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Mads Lauridsen, Istvan Z. Kovacs, Preben Mogensen, Mads Sorensen, and Steffen Holst. 2016. Coverage and Capacity Analysis of LTE-M and NB-IoT in a Rural Area. In 2016 IEEE 84th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall). IEEE, Montreal, QC, Canada, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCFall.2016.7880946Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Cristina Lopez-Pavon, Sandra Sendra, and Juan F. Valenzuela-Valdes. 2018. Evaluation of CupCarbon Network Simulator for Wireless Sensor Networks. Network Protocols and Algorithms 10, 2 (June 2018), 1. https://doi.org/10.5296/npa.v10i2.13201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Mohamed Marzouk and Ismail Al Daour. 2018. Planning Labor Evacuation for Construction Sites Using BIM and Agent-Based Simulation. Safety Science 109 (Nov. 2018), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Balmer Michael, Meister Konrad, Rieser Marcel, Nagel Kai, and Axhausen W, Kay. 2008. Agent-Based Simulation of Travel Demand: Structure and Computational Performance of MATSim-T. (July 2008), 37 p.https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-A-005626451Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Roberto Minerva, Gyu Myoung Lee, and Noel Crespi. 2020. Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models. Proc. IEEE 108, 10 (Oct. 2020), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2020.2998530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Steve Moffat, Mohammad Hammoudeh, and Robert Hegarty. 2017. A survey on ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption (CP-ABE) approaches to data security on mobile devices and its application to IoT. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Neda Mohammadi, Ambuz Vimal, and John E Taylor. [n. d.]. Knowledge Discovery in Smart City Digital Twins. ([n. d.]), 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. H. Mroue, A. Nasser, S. Hamrioui, B. Parrein, E. Motta-Cruz, and G. Rouyer. 2018. MAC Layer-Based Evaluation of IoT Technologies: LoRa, SigFox and NB-IoT. In 2018 IEEE Middle East and North Africa Communications Conference (MENACOMM). IEEE, Jounieh, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MENACOMM.2018.8371016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Kai Nagel, Paula Stretz, Martin Pieck, Rick Donnelly, and Christopher L. Barrett. 1997. TRANSIMS Traffic Flow Characteristics. arxiv:adap-org/9710003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Johannes Nguyen, Simon T. Powers, Neil Urquhart, Thomas Farrenkopf, and Michael Guckert. 2021. An Overview of Agent-Based Traffic Simulators. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 12 (Dec. 2021), 100486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Jan Remund and Stefan Müller. 2011. Solar Radiation and Uncertainty Information of Meteonorm 7. In Proceedings of the ISES Solar World Congress 2011. International Solar Energy Society, Kassel, Germany, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.18086/swc.2011.24.25Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Vincent Rialle. [n. d.]. Villes intelligentes sources d’inspiration. ([n. d.]), 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Mohammad Safeeq and Ali Fares. 2011. Accuracy Evaluation of ClimGen Weather Generator and Daily to Hourly Disaggregation Methods in Tropical Conditions. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 106, 3-4 (Dec. 2011), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-011-0438-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Mustapha Saidallah, Abdeslam El Fergougui, and Abdelbaki Elbelrhiti Elalaoui. 2016. A Comparative Study of Urban Road Traffic Simulators. MATEC Web of Conferences 81 (2016), 05002. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20168105002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Khaled Shaaban and Inhi Kim. 2015. Comparison of SimTraffic and VISSIM Microscopic Traffic Simulation Tools in Modeling Roundabouts. Procedia Computer Science 52 (2015), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Souhila Silmi, Zouina Doukha, Rebiha Kemcha, and Samira Moussaoui. 2020. Wireless Sensor Networks Simulators and Testbeds. In Computer Science & Information Technology. AIRCC Publishing Corporation, 141–159. https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2020.100912Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Amir Sinaeepourfard, Jordi Garcia, Xavier Masip-Bruin, and Eva Marin-Tordera. [n. d.]. Fog-to-Cloud (F2C) Data Management for Smart Cities. ([n. d.]), 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Seungyoub Ssin, Hochul Cho, and Woontack Woo. [n. d.]. GeoVCM: Virtual Urban Digital Twin System Augmenting Virtual and Real Geo-spacial Data. ([n. d.]), 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. M A Stoddard, L Etienne, M Fournier, R Pelot, and L Beveridge. 2016. Making Sense of Arctic Maritime Traffic Using the Polar Operational Limits Assessment Risk Indexing System (POLARIS). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 34 (April 2016), 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/34/1/012034Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Daniel(Jian) Sun, Lihui Zhang, and Fangxi Chen. 2013. Comparative Study on Simulation Performances of CORSIM and VISSIM for Urban Street Network. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 37 (Sept. 2013), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2013.05.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Dinesh Thangavel, Xiaoping Ma, Alvin Valera, Hwee-Xian Tan, and Colin Keng-Yan Tan. 2014. Performance Evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a Common Middleware. In 2014 IEEE Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP). IEEE, Singapore, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSNIP.2014.6827678Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Nguyen Quoc Uy and Vu Hoai Nam. 2019. A Comparison of AMQP and MQTT Protocols for Internet of Things. In 2019 6th NAFOSTED Conference on Information and Computer Science (NICS). IEEE, Hanoi, Vietnam, 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1109/NICS48868.2019.9023812Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Chenyu Wang, Zhipeng Cai, and Yingshu Li. 2022. Sustainable Blockchain-based Digital Twin Management Architecture for IoT Devices. IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2022), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3153653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Xiaoyong Wang, Haifeng Song, Wei Zha, Jing Li, and Hairong Dong. 2021. Digital Twin Based Validation Platform for Smart Metro Scenarios. In 2021 IEEE 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI). IEEE, Beijing, China, 386–389. https://doi.org/10.1109/DTPI52967.2021.9540161Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Yutong Wang, Yansong Cao, and Fei-Yue Wang. 2021. Anomaly Detection in Digital Twin Model. In 2021 IEEE 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI). IEEE, Beijing, China, 208–211. https://doi.org/10.1109/DTPI52967.2021.9540116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Michael Weigelt. [n. d.]. Crowd Simulation. ([n. d.]), 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Xiaodong Xian, Weiren Shi, and He Huang. 2008. Comparison of OMNET++ and Other Simulator for WSN Simulation. In 2008 3rd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. IEEE, Singapore, 1439–1443. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2008.4582757Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Andrea Zanella, Nicola Bui, Angelo Castellani, Lorenzo Vangelista, and Michele Zorzi. 2014. Internet of Things for Smart Cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 1, 1 (Feb. 2014), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Guobin Zhang and Xinying Wang. 2021. Digital Twin Modeling for Photovoltaic Panels Based on Hybrid Neural Network. In 2021 IEEE 1st International Conference on Digital Twins and Parallel Intelligence (DTPI). IEEE, Beijing, China, 90–93. https://doi.org/10.1109/DTPI52967.2021.9540210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Jun Zhang, Lin Li, Guanjun Lin, Da Fang, Yonghang Tai, and Jiechun Huang. 2020. Cyber Resilience in Healthcare Digital Twin on Lung Cancer. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 201900–201913. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Tan Yan Zhi, Cheu Ruey Long, and Lee Der Horng. 2005. COMPARISON OF PARAMICS AND GETRAM/AIMSUN FOR ITS SIMULATIONS. 45, 2 (2005), 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Peng Zhou, Siwei Jiang, Athirai Irissappane, Jie Zhang, Jianying Zhou, and Joseph Chee Ming Teo. 2015. Toward Energy-Efficient Trust System Through Watchdog Optimization for WSNs. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 10, 3 (March 2015), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2015.2389145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. From Simulation to Digital Twins, the Case of Internet of Things Research and Tools

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICFNDS '22: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Future Networks & Distributed Systems
            December 2022
            734 pages
            ISBN:9781450399050
            DOI:10.1145/3584202

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 9 May 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)81
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format