skip to main content
10.1145/3584376.3584572acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesricaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An improved artificial bee colony algorithm for multi-objective low-carbon ship block painting scheduling problem: An improved artificial bee colony algorithm for ship block painting scheduling problem

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Based on the analysis of the ship block painting scheduling problem (SBPSP), this paper proposes a multi-objective low-carbon ship block painting scheduling problem that considers the electrical energy consumed by VOCs equipment and the carbon emissions caused by LNG gas. The objective function of this study is to minimize the maximum makespan, uneven workload, and carbon emission. Considering the constraints of human resources, a multi-day planning and scheduling model including sand-washing and spraying tasks is established. Since the problem is a non-deterministic polynomial time hard problem (NP-hard), an improved artificial bee colony algorithm (IABC) is proposed to efficiently obtain a near-optimal solution in a reasonable time. Based on the model, a three-dimensional encoding solution method is designed, and a special solution combination method and crossover operators are designed according to the characteristics of the problem. The greedy randomized adaptive search procedures (GRASP) and the variable neighborhood search (VNS) algorithm are mixed in the IABC algorithm to increase search efficiency. Finally, this paper conducts numerical experiment analysis on the improved algorithm and the results of NSGA-II, SS, and ABC algorithms. Through three evaluation metrics, it is proved that the algorithm can be better applied to the scheduling problem of ship block scheduling problem.

References

  1. Zhou Jian, Li Xiaoyuan and Deng Yirong. China's carbon neutral development status and key strategy prospects. Environmental Science and Management, 47, 08, 2022, 5-9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lu, C., Li, X., Gao, L., Liao, W. and Yi, J. An effective multi-objective discrete virus optimization algorithm for flexible job-shop scheduling problem with controllable processing times. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 104, 2017, 156-174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mokhtari, H. and Hasani, A. An energy-efficient multi-objective optimization for flexible job-shop scheduling problem. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 104, 2017, 339-352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Pei, F., Zhang, J., Mei, S. and Song, H. Critical Review on the Objective Function of Flexible Job Shop Scheduling. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Zhang Zhiying, Lin Chen, Yang Liansheng, Xue Shimei and Liu Jianfeng, Hybrid flow shop scheduling for segmental coating operations. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 48, 03, 2014, 382-387+393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tao, N. R., Jiang, Z.H., Liu, J.F., Xia, B.X. and Li, B.H. A metaheuristic algorithm to transporter scheduling for assembly blocks in a shipyard considering precedence and cooperating constraints. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Escamilla, J., Salido, M. A., Giret, A. and Barber, F. A metaheuristic technique for energy-efficiency in job-shop scheduling. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 31, 5, 2016, 475-485Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Zhang, B., Pan, Q.-k., Meng, L.-l., Lu, C., Mou, J.-h. and Li, J.-q. An automatic multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for the hybrid flowshop scheduling problem with consistent sublots. Knowledge-Based Systems, 238, 2022, 107819Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Pavlenko, N., Comer, B., Zhou, Y., Clark, N. and Rutherford, D. The climate implications of using LNG as a marine fuel. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency: Stockholm, Sweden, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Li, Y., Huang, W., Wu, R. and Guo, K. J. A. S. C. An improved artificial bee colony algorithm for solving multi-objective low-carbon flexible job shop scheduling problem, 95, 2020, 106544.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ibrahim, A., Rahnamayan, S., Martin, M. V. and Deb, K. 3D-RadVis: Visualization of Pareto front in many-objective optimization. IEEE, City, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yuan, M., Li, Y., Zhang, L., Pei, F. J. R. and Manufacturing, C.-I. Research on intelligent workshop resource scheduling method based on improved NSGA-II algorithm, 71, 2021, 102141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Behnamian, J., Memar Dezfooli, S. and Asgari, H. J. T. J. o. S. A scatter search algorithm with a novel solution representation for flexible open shop scheduling: a multi-objective optimization, 77, 11, 2021, 13115-13138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    RICAI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 4th International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Control and Artificial Intelligence
    December 2022
    1396 pages
    ISBN:9781450398343
    DOI:10.1145/3584376

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 April 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate140of294submissions,48%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format