skip to main content
10.1145/3584748.3584804acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on Operating Efficiency of Civil Airports in China

Published:05 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, the DEA-Malmquist model is used to evaluate static and dynamic efficiency of 30 civil airports in China from 2016 to 2021. The developments of airports in different regions are discussed from these aspects: the impact of local government policies and COVID-19 on changes of airports’ total factor productivity, and differences in operating efficiency of airports in different regions. The results show that: there are great differences in the operating efficiency of airports in China, and the low pure technical efficiency is the main reason leading to the low technological efficiency. The stagnation of total factor productivity of Chinese airports is mainly influenced by technological progress, and its negative effect drags down the stable technical efficiency and scale efficiency. There are obvious differences in operating efficiency among different regions. Airports in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta have the highest efficiency, the Chengdu-Chongqing region has the fastest development, and the northeast region has the slowest development and the lowest operating efficiency.

References

  1. David G, Ashish L. Developing measures of airport productivity and performance: an application of data envelopment analysis [J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 1997,33(4):261-273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [B Juan, Carlos, Martı́n, An application of DEA to measure the efficiency of Spanish airports prior to privatization[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2001,7(3):149-157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Matulaitis K , Huettinger M . Determinants of airport efficiency: east-west comparison[J]. Ism University of Management & Economics, 2014,10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Postorino M N, Praticò F G. An application of the Multi-Criteria Decision-Making analysis to a regional multi-airport system[J]. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2012, 4:44-52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Alonso,A. Benito,L. Boto. The efficiency of noise mitigation measures at Buropean airports[J]. Transportation Research Procedia. 2017,04.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ozlem Sahin, Oznur Usarmaz, Enis T Turgut. An assessment of flight efficiencybased on the point merge system at metroplex airports[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Zietsman D, Vanderschuren M. Analytic Hierarchy Process assessment for potentialmulti-airport systems: The case of Cape Town[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2014,36:41-49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Keskin в. Köksal C.D. A hybrid AHPDEA-AR model for measuring and comparing theeficiency of aiports[J]. Inematioal Joumal of Poductivity and Perfomance Management,2019. 68(3): 524-541.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan Huanli, Liu Dan, Research on Efficiency and Influencing Factors of Chinese Airports[J]. Logistics Technology, 2018(10):48-53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shen Zuiyi, Ma Jinfan, Research on Operation Efficiency of Civil Aviation Airport based on Three-phase DEA Model[J]. Special Zone Economy, 2018(11):121-123Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Han Dong, Wu Weiwei, Evaluation of Airport Operation Efficiency Considering Non-Expected Output[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2019,36(06):47-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yu Zhiqian. Study on the Efficiency Evaluation of the Interactive Development between Ten Million Level Airports and Cities in China[J]. Civil Aviation Management, 2020,(04):39-42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao Li, Jing Chongyi, A Comparative Research on Operation Efficiency of Airport Groups in China[J]. China Transportation Review, 2020,42(08):8-11+27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang Yu, Deng Zhi, An Empirical Study on Route Operational Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2021,51(05):1-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Yu Xincai. The Application of DEA in Efficiency Analysis of Listed Airport Companies in China[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation, 2021,5(06)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Caves D, Christensen L, Diewert W.1982. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica.50(6),1393-1494.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fare R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, 1994. Productivity growth, technical progress and efficiency changes in industrialized countries. American Economic Review. 84(1),66-83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhao, S.-L., Zhang, G., Li, M.-X., Yue, X.-G., Wang, D.-D. Rock microcrack's dominant direction and the anisotropy (2015) Wuhan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 37 (5), pp. 57-63. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-4431.2015.05.010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang, G., Yue, X.-G., Li, F., Zhao, S.-L. Partially stabilised zirconia stability prediction based on opposite degree algorithm for safety engineering (2015) Materials Research Innovations, 19, pp. S5671-S5673. DOI: 10.1179/1432891714Z.0000000001173Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yue, X.-G., Zhang, G., Wu, Q., Li, F., Chen, X.-F., Ren, G.-F., Li, M. Wearing prediction of stellite alloys based on opposite degree algorithm (2015) Rare Metals, 34 (2), pp. 125-132. DOI: 10.1007/s12598-014-0430-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Sun, Y., Cao, Y., Xiong, F., Yue, X., Qiu, J., He, X., Zhao, F.The wood slice cell image identification algorithm based on singular value decomposition (2015) Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 12 (12), pp. 5372-5378. DOI: 10.1166/jctn.2015.4529Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Cao, Y., Xiong, F., Yue, X., Zhao, Y. Computer simulations find the optimum combination of solexa sequencing libraries (2015) Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 12 (12), pp. 5059-5065. DOI: 10.1166/jctn.2015.4474Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EBIMCS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
    December 2022
    396 pages
    ISBN:9781450397827
    DOI:10.1145/3584748

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 May 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format