skip to main content
10.1145/3584748.3584806acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesebimcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on Managerial Ability and Firm Performance of Listed Tourism Companies Based on Moderating Effect of Equity Incentives

Published:05 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Management, as the leader of a company, has been a scarce resource for company management. Against this background, equity incentive, which has been introduced into China out of its great success and increasing maturity in western corporate governance, plays a key role in company competition. It can influence not only the management's decisions but also firm performance so that the managerial ability and the firm performance may be moderated. Focusing on management, the strategy maker, this paper adopts multiple regression analysis to explore the relationship between managerial ability and firm performance of listed tourism companies, as well as the moderating effect of equity incentive on this relationship. Sample data are collected from 22 A-share listed tourism companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2013 to 2021. The conclusion is that equity incentive has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between managerial ability and firm performance of listed tourism companies.

References

  1. Yang Yong. 2021. Research on Optimization of Development Strategy of KST Tourism Corporation. MA Thesis, Chongqing Technology and Business University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Diao Yunting. 2021. Research on the Impact of Executive Incentives on the Performance of China's Listed Tourism Companies. MA Thesis, Southwest University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Xu Chao. 2018. Interlocking Directorates Network in Firm Performance by Tourism-related Listed Companies. MA Thesis, Huaqiao University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Li Yin. 2021. Managerial Ability, Executive Incentive and Firm Performance. MA Thesis, Yunnan University of Finance and Economics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Tang Fan. 2021. Managerial Ability, R&D Investment and Firm Performance: Dual Perspectives Based on Internal and External Supervision. MA Thesis, Jiangnan University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Peter Demerjian, Baruch Lev, and Sarah McVay. 2013. Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Operations Research: Management science, 53(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Afzalur Rahim and Thomas V. Bonoma. 1979. Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44(3_suppl).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jinhoo Hwang, Kyung-il Lee, Raeik Jang, and Seongwoo Jeon. 2018. A study on the introduction of total natural resources management system using the environmental conservation value assessment map. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Technical Commission III Midterm Symposium on “Developments, Technologies and Applications in Remote Sensing”, 841-846.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. He Huiqin. 2018. Corporate governance, managers’ ability and enterprise performance. Communication of Finance and Accounting, (15): 52-55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng Guizhi. 2012. An empirical study of managers’ impression management behavior. In Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Social Science and Education (ICSSE 2012) Volume 10., 423-428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pan Hongjing. 2016. Financial characteristics, agency cost and equity incentive level of growth enterprise market. In Proceedings of Decision Forum - Academic Conference on Regional Development and Public Policy Research Volume 2., 41-43+45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Nan Jinwei. 2018. Research on equity incentive and corporate performance of GEM listed companies. Tax Paying, (16): 198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stéphane Andrieux and Thouraya Nouri Baranger. 2012. Emerging crack front identification from tangential surface displacements. Comptes rendus - Mécanique, 340(8).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zou Jing. 2016. Does equity incentive policy improve company performance? Empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned listed companies. Communication of Finance and Accounting, (06): 33-36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang Jing and Ding Yizhen. 2021. Research on the impact of executive incentives on enterprise performance – Based on empirical data of listed companies on small and medium-sized boards. Jiangsu Commercial Forum, (02): 117-119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang Jing and Li Pei. 2021. Research on the influence of stock incentives on enterprise financial performance. Trade Fair Economy, (10): 108-111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yin Meiqun, Sheng Lei, and Li Wenbo. 2018. Executive incentive, innovation input and corporate performance: an empirical study based on endogeneity and industry categories. Nankai Business Review, 21(01): 109-117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hao Yin, Yu Bing, and Li Xueyi. 2022. Combination of industry and finance, governance embedding, and enterprise performance: empirical evidence from entity enterprises holding financial institutions. Friends of Accounting, (04): 45-54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma, X., Zhang, Z., Han, Y., Yue, X.-G. Sustainable policy dynamics-A study on the recent "bust" of foreign residential real estate investment in Sydney (2019) Sustainability (Switzerland), 11 (20), art. no. 5856. DOI: 10.3390/su11205856Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Han, Y., Shao, X.-F., Cui, X., Yue, X.-G., Bwalya, K.J., Manta, O. Assessing investor belief: An analysis of trading for sustainable growth of stock markets (2019) Sustainability (Switzerland), 11 (20), art. no. 5600. DOI: 10.3390/su11205600Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang, J., Lu, C., Wang, J., Wang, L., Yue, X.-G. Concrete cracks detection based on FCN with dilated convolution (2019) Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9 (13), art. no. 2686. DOI: 10.3390/app9132686Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. He, H., Li, S., Hu, L., Duarte, N., Manta, O., Yue, X.-G. Risk factor identification of sustainable guarantee network based on logistic regression algorithm (2019) Sustainability (Switzerland), 11 (13), art. no. 3525. DOI: 10.3390/su11133525Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Luan, Y., Li, Y., Yue, X., Cao, Y., Xiang, F., Mao, D., Xiong, Z. Metabonomics of mice intestine in Codonopsis foetens induced apoptosis of intestine cancer cells (2019) Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 26 (5), pp. 1003-1010. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.11.010Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Zheng, S.-Y., Jiang, S.-P., Yue, X.-G., Pu, R., Li, B.-Q. Application research of an innovative online education model in big data environment (2019) International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14 (8), pp. 125-138. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v14i08.10404Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EBIMCS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on E-Business, Information Management and Computer Science
    December 2022
    396 pages
    ISBN:9781450397827
    DOI:10.1145/3584748

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 5 May 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate143of708submissions,20%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format