skip to main content
10.1145/3584816.3584821acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on the Dynamic Assessment of Comprehensive Risk Measurement and Investment Performance of Financial Assets

Published:26 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Financial assets have the basic characteristics of risk, profitability, liquidity and so on. How to effectively complete the dynamic monitoring of comprehensive risk and investment performance of financial assets is still an important content of asset investment and management business. This paper takes the characteristic engineering as the basic knowledge theory, takes five stocks in China's A-share market as the research object, uses mathematical statistics and other methods to calculate the economic characteristics and physical characteristics of the selected stocks, and constructs the Comprehensive risk index and Investment performance index through the CRITIC-FAHP subjective-objective weighting method, so as to complete the comprehensive calculation and dynamic evaluation of the risk value and investment performance of the selected financial assets. The calculation results show that the comprehensive index constructed in this paper has high accuracy and good stability, which can avoid the evaluation deviation of the single factor model to a certain extent, and scientifically, comprehensively and deeply reflect the complex characteristics and internal laws of financial assets; At the same time, it can also be combined with Markowitz's Mean-Variance model to optimize its parameter structure and configuration, so as to provide some reference for investors or salespeople to make investment decisions.

References

  1. Jianping Lan. On risk and development trend of international financial market[J]. Financial Forum,2018,6(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Li Jie. Forecasting of financial risks and analysis of financial risk assessment[J]. Modern Economic Information,2014,(09):350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhang Jin. Research on systemic financial risk assessment based on financial risk stress index[J]. Shanghai Finance,2012,(09):53-57+117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shen Hongwei, Li Lizhen. A quantitative approach to investment performance assessment[J]. Journal of Taiyuan Normal College (Natural Science Edition), 2004(03):34-37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Xie Hongli. A brief review of domestic and foreign economic and financial risk evaluation index systems[J]. Statistical Research,2000,(01):23-27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang Zhouwei, Wu Zhanxia. Research on dynamic assessment of comprehensive risk value of financial assets[J]. Financial Theory and Practice,2012,33(05):2-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Xu Daoxuan, Shi Zhangming. An improved KLR signal analysis method applied research[J]. Quantitative Economic and Technical Economics Research, 2007(11):124-132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhang Jin. Research on systemic financial risk assessment based on financial risk stress index[J]. Shanghai Finance,2012,(09):53-57+117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Da Tanfeng. Bank systemic risk and macroprudential management: a review of international research and commentary[J]. Financial Development Research,2014,(02):22-27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhou Junming, Li Yanli. Review and Enlightenment of systematic financial risk assessment methods [J]. Beijing Financial Review,2019,(04):25-32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang Kai, Shen Jia. Investment performance assessment indicators and applications[J]. Statistics and Decision Making,2008(11):182-183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lehmann B N , Modest D M . Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation: A Comparison of Benchmarks and Benchmark Comparisons[J]. Journal of Finance, 1987, 42(2):233-265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Fama E F , French K R . Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 33(1):3-56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Eugene F. Fama,Kenneth R. French. A five-factor asset pricing model[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2015,116(1):1-22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Henriksson R D. Market Timing and Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Investigation[J]. The Journal of Business, 1984, 57(1):73-96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Treynor J L , Mazuy K K . Can Mutual Funds Outguess the Market[J]. Harvard business review, 1966, 44(1):131-136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chang E C, Lewellen W C. Market timing and mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Business, 1984, 57: 57-72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Rockafellar R T , Uryasev S . Optimization of conditional valueat-risk[J]. Journal of Risk, 1999, 2(3).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Richman J S , Randall M J . Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy.[J]. American Journal of Physiology Heart & Circulatory Physiology, 2000, 278(6):H2039-H2049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Zhang Jijun. A comparative study of three ranking methods of fuzzy consistent judgment matrix[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics Technology,2003,(11):1370-1372.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Yanhai. Matlab implementation of fuzzy hierarchical analysis method[J]. Silicon Valley,2009(17):2+38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Research on the Dynamic Assessment of Comprehensive Risk Measurement and Investment Performance of Financial Assets
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICCMB '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business
            January 2023
            191 pages
            ISBN:9781450398046
            DOI:10.1145/3584816

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 26 June 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format