skip to main content
10.1145/3584816.3584827acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive in Predicting E-Business Intention to Adopt Eco-design

Published:26 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has hit the economy. Countries have taken off to emerge from these conditions. In Indonesia, the economic revival was driven by the development of the e-business sector. However, can these new emerging e-business survive to compete with existing big companies? E-business must have a competitive advantage, and one of them is through innovation based on eco-design. Our study examines the factors which influence e-business intention to adopt eco-design. These factors are based on the theoretical approach of planned behavior and social cognitive theory. Our research is a quantitative study using structural equation modeling partial least squares. We use a questionnaire to gather primary data. We choose e-business entrepreneurs as respondents and processing data using SMART PLS 3 software. We share questionnaires to 200 small medium e-business practitioner. Our results found that attitude and self-efficacy had a significant effect on e-business intention to adopt eco-design, while subjective norm and perceived behavior control each has no significant effect.

References

  1. H. Hartono and R. Ardini, “The Effect of Opportunity Recognition and Organization Capability on SME Performance in Indonesia Moderated by Business Model Innovation,” The Winners, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2022, doi: 10.21512/tw.v23i1.6932.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. B. Alexandri and W. K. Anjani, “Income Smoothing: Impact Factors, Evidence in Indonesia,” Int. J. Small Bus. Entrep. Res., 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. Vihma and H. Moora, “Potential of Circular Design in Estonian SMEs and their Capacity to Push it,” Environ. Clim. Technol., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 94–103, 2020, doi: 10.2478/rtuect-2020-0088.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Monteiro, F. J. G. Silva, S. F. Ramos, R. D. S. G. Campilho, and A. M. Fonseca, “Eco-design and sustainability in packaging: A survey,” Procedia Manuf., vol. 38, no. 2019, pp. 1741–1749, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.097.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. T. Zeng, J. Deschenes, and F. Durif, “Eco-design packaging: An epistemological analysis and transformative research agenda,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 276, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. I. Ajzen, “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior,” Action Control, pp. 11–39, 1985, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Bandura, “Social cognitive theory of self-regulation,” Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 248–287, 1991, doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. H. Micheaux and F. Aggeri, “Eco-modulation as a driver for eco-design: A dynamic view of the French collective EPR scheme,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 289, p. 125714, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Y. M. K. Syabana and G. B. Park, “A study on the applicability of batik for public transportation design in Indonesia,” J. Mechatronics, Electr. Power, Veh. Technol., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 75–85, 2020, doi: 10.14203/j.mev.2020.v11.75-85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Burch and J. Di Bella, “Business models for the Anthropocene: accelerating sustainability transformations in the private sector,” Sustain. Sci., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1963–1976, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11625-021-01037-3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. O. Stepchenkova and H. Park, “Authenticity orientation as an attitude: Scale construction and validation,” Tour. Manag., vol. 83, p. 104249, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A.-H. G. Abulrub, Y. Yin, and M. A. Williams, “Acceptance and Management of Innovation in SMEs: Immersive 3D visualisation,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 41, pp. 304–314, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.035.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. V. Vamvaka, C. Stoforos, T. Palaskas, and C. Botsaris, “Attitude toward entrepreneurship, perceived behavioral control, and entrepreneurial intention: dimensionality, structural relationships, and gender differences,” J. Innov. Entrep., vol. 9, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s13731-020-0112-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. M. Cumberland, J. M. Petrosko, and G. D. Jones, “Motivations for Pursuing Professional Certification,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 57–82, 2018, doi: 10.1002/piq.21256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. F. Liñán and Y. Chen, “Development and Cross-Cultural Application of a Specific Instrument to Measure Entrepreneurial Intentions,” Entrep. Theory Pract., pp. 593–617, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. C. Wan, G. Qiping, and S. Choi, “Experiential and instrumental attitudes: Interaction effect of attitude and subjective norm on recycling intention,” J. Environ. Psychol., vol. 50, pp. 69–79, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.02.006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. K. M. White and M. K. Hyde, “The Role of in the Prediction of Household Recycling Behavior in Australia,” Environ. Behav., vol. 44, pp. 785–799, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0013916511408069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. P. Sparks, I. Ajzen, and T. Hall-box, “Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior,” J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 665–683, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. N. van Nes and J. Cramer, “Influencing product lifetime through product design,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 286–299, 2005, doi: 10.1002/bse.491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. R. A. Simons , “The Quadruple Bottom Line: Tenant Views of Corporate Responsibility in Green Office Buildings,” J. Sustain. Real Estate, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 153–171, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10835547.2017.12091896.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. F. E. Mbebeb, “Building Ecological Entrepreneurship: Creating Environmental Solutions Based on the Cultural Realities and Needs of Local People,” J. Environ. Invest., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 43–62, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. R. Efendi, “Self Efficacy: Study Indigenous on Java Tribe Teacher,” J. Soc. Ind. Psychol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 61–67, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Kreitler, D. Peleg, and M. Ehrenfeld, “Stress , self-efficacy and quality of life in cancer patients,” vol. 341, no. August 2006, pp. 329–341, 2007, doi: 10.1002/pon.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. A. Tarhini, K. Hone, and X. Liu, “A cross-cultural examination of the impact of social, organisational and individual factors on educational technology acceptance between British and Lebanese university students,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 739–755, 2015, doi: 10.1111/bjet.12169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. W. Creswell, Research Design. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. J. T. Roscoe, “Fundamental research statistics for the behavioural sciences (2nd Edition),” Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York. 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sugiyono, Metode Education Research. Approach Quantitative, Qualitative, and R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. S. A. Melynk, R. P. Sroufe, and R. Calantone, “Assessing the Impact of Environmental Management Systems on Corporate and Environmental Performance,” J. Oper. Manag., vol. 21, pp. 329–351, 2003, [Online]. Available: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/12067812/RSPCA-warns-rise-of-fad-pets-inspired-by-popular-films-is-leading-to-widespread-neglect-of-exotic-animals.html.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. T.-C. Kuo, M.-L. Tseng, C.-H. Lin, R. Wang, and C. Lee, “Identifying Sustainable Behavior of Energy Consumers as a Driver of Design Solutions: The Missing Link in Eco-design,” J. Clean. Prod., 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. F. Bacanli, “Personality Characteristics as Predictors of Personal Indecisiveness,” J. Career Dev., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 320–332, 2006, doi: 10.1177/0894845305282941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. I. Ghozali and L. Hengky, Concept, Technique and Application to Use Program of Smart PLS 3.0. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. U. Sekaran and R. Bougie, Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach, 7th, abrigat ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2016, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Y. Xue, J. Bradley, and H. Liang, “Journal of Knowledge Management Team climate, empowering leadership, and knowledge sharing,” J. Knowl. Manag. Andreas Riege J. Knowl. Manag. Iss J. Knowl. Manag. Iss J. Knowl. Manag., 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. A. Lewandowska and A. Matuszak-flejszman, “Eco-design as a normative element of Environmental Management Systems — the context of the revised ISO 14001: 2015,” Int J Life Cycle Assess, vol. 19, no. 2014, pp. 1794–1798, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11367-014-0787-1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. J. S. Chiou, “The Effects of Attitude , Subjective Norm , and Perceived Behavioral Control on Consumers ’ Purchase Intentions: The Moderating Effects of Product Knowledge and Attention to Social Comparison Information,” vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 298–308, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. S. Neuville, M. Frenay, and E. Bourgeois, “Task value , self-efficacy and goal orientations: performance among university students,” Psychol. Belg., vol. 47, no. 1/2, pp. 95–117, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. E. C. Hastings and R. L. West, “Goal orientation and self-efficacy in relation to memory in adulthood,” Aging, Neuropsychol. Cogn., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 471–493, 2011, doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.575926.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. L. Ritchie, D. Cervone, and B. T. Sharpe, “Goals and Self-Efficacy Beliefs During the Initial COVID-19 Lockdown: A Mixed Methods Analysis,” Front. Psychol., vol. 11, no. January, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Planned Behavior and Social Cognitive in Predicting E-Business Intention to Adopt Eco-design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCMB '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business
      January 2023
      191 pages
      ISBN:9781450398046
      DOI:10.1145/3584816

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 June 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format