skip to main content
10.1145/3584931.3606978acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Animal Narratives and Emotional Resonance in #ClimateChange Discourse on Social Media: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Published:14 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Teens, who are online almost constantly, engage with climate change posts on social media. We present the findings of a qualitative content analysis of the most popular climate change posts (tagged with #ClimateChange) on Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. Over four weeks in Spring 2022, we collected the top five weekly posts (n = 60) to understand how they address animals and emotions and relate to teens’ perceptions of climate change online based on prior survey work with 100 American teens. Our research reveals that more than a quarter (26.7%) of all analyzed posts relate to animals, and many (87.5%) employ negative language when discussing animals. We offer recommendations to enhance online climate change communication for teens, foster pro-environmental behaviors, attitudes, and activism, and study social media discourse across platforms. We highlight the need for further research on youth, climate change, and social media.

References

  1. Denise E. Agosto, June Abbas, and Robin Naughton. 2012. Relationships and social rules: Teens’ social network and other ICT selection practices. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 6 (June 2012), 1108–1124. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22612Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ashley A. Anderson. 2017. Effects of Social Media Use on Climate Change Opinion, Knowledge, and Behavior. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.369Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Monica Anderson and Jingjing Jiang. 2018. Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved January 15, 2022 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zahra Ashktorab and Jessica Vitak. 2016. Designing Cyberbullying Mitigation and Prevention Solutions through Participatory Design With Teenagers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, San Jose California USA, 3895–3905. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858548Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tina Askanius and Julie Uldam. 2011. Online Social Media for Radical Politics: Climate Activism on YouTube. Int. J. Electron. Gov. 4, 1–2 (2011), 69–84. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2011.041708Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Corey H. Basch, Bhavya Yalamanchili, and Joseph Fera. 2022. #Climate Change on TikTok: A Content Analysis of Videos. J. Community Health 47, 1 (February 2022), 163–167. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-021-01031-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Shelley Boulianne, Mireille Lalancette, and David Ilkiw. 2020. “School Strike 4 Climate”: Social Media and the International Youth Protest on Climate Change. Media Commun. 8, 2 (May 2020), 208–218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2768Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological., Harris Cooper, Paul M. Camic, Debra L. Long, A. T. Panter, David Rindskopf and Kenneth J. Sher (eds.). American Psychological Association, Washington, 57–71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tobias Brosch. 2021. Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: a review. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 42, (December 2021), 15–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tobias Brosch and Linda Steg. 2021. Leveraging emotion for sustainable action. One Earth 4, 12 (December 2021), 1693–1703. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.11.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Despoina Chatzakou, Ilias Leontiadis, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gianluca Stringhini, Athena Vakali, and Nicolas Kourtellis. 2019. Detecting Cyberbullying and Cyberaggression in Social Media. ACM Trans. Web 13, 3 (August 2019), 1–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3343484Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shuquan Chen, Rohini Bagrodia, Charlotte C. Pfeffer, Laura Meli, and George A. Bonanno. 2020. Anxiety and resilience in the face of natural disasters associated with climate change: A review and methodological critique. J. Anxiety Disord. 76, (December 2020), 102297. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Xuetong Chen, Martin D. Sykora, Thomas W. Jackson, and Suzanne Elayan. 2018. What about Mood Swings: Identifying Depression on Twitter with Temporal Measures of Emotions. In Companion of the The Web Conference 2018 on The Web Conference 2018 - WWW ’18, ACM Press, Lyon, France, 1653–1660. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191624Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Silvia Collado and Miguel A. Sorrel. 2019. Children's environmental moral judgments: Variations according to type of victim and exposure to nature. J. Environ. Psychol. 62, (April 2019), 42–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Anthony Costello, Mustafa Abbas, Adriana Allen, Sarah Ball, Sarah Bell, Richard Bellamy, Sharon Friel, Nora Groce, Anne Johnson, Maria Kett, Maria Lee, Caren Levy, Mark Maslin, David McCoy, Bill McGuire, Hugh Montgomery, David Napier, Christina Pagel, Jinesh Patel, Jose Antonio Puppim De Oliveira, Nanneke Redclift, Hannah Rees, Daniel Rogger, Joanne Scott, Judith Stephenson, John Twigg, Jonathan Wolff, and Craig Patterson. 2009. Managing the health effects of climate change. The Lancet 373, 9676 (May 2009), 1693–1733. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60935-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Munmun De Choudhury, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Predicting postpartum changes in emotion and behavior via social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Paris France, 3267–3276. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466447Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Greg Guest, Kathleen M. MacQueen, and Emily E. Namey. 2011. Applied Thematic Analysis. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hsiu-Fang Hsieh and Sarah E. Shannon. 2005. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 9 (November 2005), 1277–1288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S. Mo Jang. 2013. Framing responsibility in climate change discourse: Ethnocentric attribution bias, perceived causes, and policy attitudes. J. Environ. Psychol. 36, (December 2013), 27–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Dian Anggraini Kusumajati, Rina Patriana Chairiyani, and Nikodemus Thomas Martoredjo. 2020. The Influence of Social Media on Human Behavior in Adolescents (Case Study of Bina Nusantara University Students). In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Big Data Engineering and Technology (BDET 2020), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 102–105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3378904.3378917Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Amanda Lenhart, Mary Madden, Aaron Smith, and Alexandra Macgill. 2007. Teens and Social Media. (December 2007). Retrieved January 19, 2023 from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/627542/teens-and-social-media/1608847/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Annette Markham. 2012. FABRICATION AS ETHICAL PRACTICE: Qualitative inquiry in ambiguous Internet contexts. Inf. Commun. Soc. 15, 3 (April 2012), 334–353. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.641993Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Aleksandrina V. Mavrodieva, Okky K. Rachman, Vito B. Harahap, and Rajib Shaw. 2019. Role of Social Media as a Soft Power Tool in Raising Public Awareness and Engagement in Addressing Climate Change. Climate 7, 10 (October 2019), 122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7100122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Adam Mayer and E. Keith Smith. 2019. Unstoppable climate change? The influence of fatalistic beliefs about climate change on behavioural change and willingness to pay cross-nationally. Clim. Policy 19, 4 (April 2019), 511–523. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1532872Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Angelina Mooseder, Cornelia Brantner, Rodrigo Zamith, and Jürgen Pfeffer. 2023. (Social) Media Logics and Visualizing Climate Change: 10 Years of #climatechange Images on Twitter. Soc. Media Soc. 9, 1 (January 2023), 205630512311643. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231164310Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Susanne C. Moser. 2007. More bad news: the risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information. In Creating a Climate for Change (1st ed.), Susanne C. Moser and Lisa Dilling (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 64–80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535871.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sidharth Muralidharan and Kim Sheehan. 2018. The Role of Guilt in Influencing Sustainable Pro-Environmental Behaviors among Shoppers: Differences in Response by Gender To Messaging about England's Plastic-Bag Levy. J. Advert. Res. 58, 3 (September 2018), 349–362. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2017-029Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Robin L. Nabi, Abel Gustafson, and Risa Jensen. 2018. Framing Climate Change: Exploring the Role of Emotion in Generating Advocacy Behavior. Sci. Commun. 40, 4 (August 2018), 442–468. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018776019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Rebecca C. Nee. 2019. Youthquakes in a Post-Truth Era: Exploring Social Media News Use and Information Verification Actions Among Global Teens and Young Adults. Journal. Mass Commun. Educ. 74, 2 (June 2019), 171–184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695818825215Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Maria Ojala. 2012. How do children cope with global climate change? Coping strategies, engagement, and well-being. J. Environ. Psychol. 32, 3 (September 2012), 225–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Alexandra Olteanu, Carlos Castillo, Nicholas Diakopoulos, and Karl Aberer. 2015. Comparing events coverage in online news and social media: 9th International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM 2015. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Web Soc. Media ICWSM 2015 (2015), 288–297.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hayley Pearce, Liselot Hudders, Dieneke Van De Sompel, and Veroline Cauberghe. 2021. Motivating Children to Become Green Kids: The Role of Victim Framing, Moral Emotions, and Responsibility on Children's Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intent. Environ. Commun. 15, 7 (October 2021), 969–985. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1934056Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Vicente Pina, Lourdes Torres, and Sonia Royo. 2017. Comparing online with offline citizen engagement for climate change: Findings from Austria, Germany and Spain. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 1 (January 2017), 26–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Stacey A. Rutledge, Vanessa P. Dennen, and Lauren M. Bagdy. 2019. Exploring Adolescent Social Media Use in a High School: Tweeting Teens in a Bell Schedule World. Teach. Coll. Rec. Voice Scholarsh. Educ. 121, 14 (November 2019), 1–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101407Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Irene G. Sarmiento, Chelsea Olson, GeckHong Yeo, Yuchi Anthony Chen, Catalina L. Toma, B. Bradford Brown, Amy Bellmore, and Marie-Louise Mares. 2018. Does social media use improve or worsen adolescents’ internalizing behaviors? Conclusions from a systematic narrative review. In Proceedings of the Technology, Mind, and Society (TechMindSociety ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3183654.3183699Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Margrit Schreier. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Alexandra Segerberg and W. Lance Bennett. 2011. Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action: Using Twitter to Explore the Ecologies of Two Climate Change Protests. Commun. Rev. 14, 3 (July 2011), 197–215. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597250Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Dovilė Šorytė and Vilmantė Pakalniškienė. 2019. Why it is important to protect the environment: reasons given by children. Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ. 28, 3 (July 2019), 228–241. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2019.1582771Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Janet K. Swim and Brittany Bloodhart. 2015. Portraying the Perils to Polar Bears: The Role of Empathic and Objective Perspective-taking Toward Animals in Climate Change Communication. Environ. Commun. 9, 4 (October 2015), 446–468. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.987304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Edson C Tandoc, Chen Lou, and Velyn Lee Hui Min. 2019. Platform-swinging in a poly-social-media context: How and why users navigate multiple social media platforms. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 24, 1 (January 2019), 21–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy022Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Warren D. TenHouten. 2016. The emotions of powerlessness. J. Polit. Power 9, 1 (January 2016), 83–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2016.1149308Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Joshua A. Tucker, Andrew Guess, Pablo Barbera, Cristian Vaccari, Alexandra Siegel, Sergey Sanovich, Denis Stukal, and Brendan Nyhan. 2018. Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Alec Tyson, Brian Kennedy, and Cary Funk. 2021. Gen Z, Millennials Stand Out for Climate Change Activism, Social Media Engagement With Issue. Pew Research Center Science & Society. Retrieved January 16, 2022 from https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/05/26/gen-z-millennials-stand-out-for-climate-change-activism-social-media-engagement-with-issue/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Nikhita Vedula and Srinivasan Parthasarathy. 2017. Emotional and Linguistic Cues of Depression from Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Digital Health, ACM, London United Kingdom, 127–136. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3079452.3079465Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Emily A. Vogels, Risa Gelles-Watnick, and Navid Massarat. 2022. Teens, Social Media and Technology 2022. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved January 17, 2023 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Susie Wang, Zoe Leviston, Mark Hurlstone, Carmen Lawrence, and Iain Walker. 2018. Emotions predict policy support: Why it matters how people feel about climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 50, (May 2018), 25–40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Emily Wielk and Alecea Standlee. 2021. Fighting for Their Future: An Exploratory Study of Online Community Building in the Youth Climate Change Movement. Qual. Sociol. Rev. 17, 2 (2021), 22–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Gabrielle Wong-Parodi and Irina Feygina. 2021. Engaging People on Climate Change: The Role of Emotional Responses. Environ. Commun. 15, 5 (July 2021), 571–593. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1871051Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Saijun Zhang, Meirong Liu, Yeefay Li, and Jae Eun Chung. 2021. Teens’ Social Media Engagement during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Time Series Examination of Posting and Emotion on Reddit. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 18, 19 (September 2021), 10079. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910079Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Animal Narratives and Emotional Resonance in #ClimateChange Discourse on Social Media: A Qualitative Content Analysis

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
          October 2023
          596 pages
          ISBN:9798400701290
          DOI:10.1145/3584931

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 October 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CSCW '24
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)154
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format