skip to main content
10.1145/3584931.3606980acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

“I Don't Need a Megaphone to Be Helpful”: Probing the Role of Technology in Pro-Choice Abortion Activism

Published:14 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The legality of abortion in the United States of America is rapidly shifting, creating a nebulous, challenging context for pro-choice abortion activists. In this in-progress work, we align ourselves with pro-choice activism as "academic accomplices" and investigate the technological habits and needs of pro-choice activists in the conservative US state of Indiana. To date, we have conducted 14 design interviews with potential / current pro-choice activists in Bloomington, Indiana, and have designed a cultural probe to examine the role of technology in pro-choice activism. We aim to understand the challenges of pro-choice activism and opportunities for supportive technology.

References

  1. Teresa Almeida, Rob Comber, and Madeline Balaam. 2016. HCI and intimate care as an agenda for change in women’s health. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (5 2016), 2599–2611. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858187Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mariam Asad, Lynn Dombrowski, Sasha Costanza-Chock, Sheena Erete, and Christina Harrington. 2019. Academic Accomplices: Practical Strategies for Research Justice. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 353–356. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3320001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mariam Asad and Christopher A. Le Dantec. 2015. Illegitimate civic participation: Supporting community activists on the ground. CSCW 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2 2015), 1694–1703. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Gro Bjerknes, Ehn Pelle, Morten Kyng, and Kristen Nygaard. 1987. Computers and democracy: a Scandinavian challenge. (1987), 434. http://www.worldcat.org/title/computers-and-democracy-a-scandinavian-challenge/oclc/614994092?referer=di&ht=editionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Susanne. Bødker. 1991. Through the interface: a human activity approach to user interface design. L. Erlbaum. 17 pages. https://www.routledge.com/Through-the-Interface-A-Human-Activity-Approach-To-User-Interface-Design/Bodker/p/book/9780805805703Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Susanne Bødker. 2009. Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Resources in Systems Development. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1103_2 11, 3 (2009), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1103_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jill P. Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: The role of collective storytelling online in a social movement organization. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (2013), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441831Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Carl DiSalvo, Thomas Lodato, Tom Jenkins, Jonathan Lukens, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making public things: How HCI design can express matters of concern. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2014), 2397–2406. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557359Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. DIS 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Fuse (6 2016), 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sarah Fox, Catherine Lim, Tad Hirsch, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2020. Accounting for Design Activism: On the Positionality and Politics of Designerly Intervention. Design Issues 36, 1 (1 2020), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00571Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sarah E. Fox, Samantha Shorey, Franchesca Spektor, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2020. Crafting everyday resistance through lightweight design. DIS 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (7 2020), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395571Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sarah E. Fox, Rafael M.L. Silva, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2018. Beyond the Prototype: Maintenance, Collective Responsibility, and Public IoT. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196710Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Indiana General Assembly. 2022. Senate Bill 1. https://iga.in.gov/legislative/2022ss1/bills/senate/1#digest-headingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Amanda Lazar and Emma Dixon. 2019. Safe Enough to Share: Setting the Dementia Agenda Online. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (11 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359187Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Amanda Lazar, Norman Makoto Su, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2019. Parting the Red Sea: Sociotechnical Systems and and Lived Experiences of Menopause. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300710Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lydia Michie, Madeline Balaam, John McCarthy, Timur Osadchiy, and Kellie Morrissey. 2018. From her story, to our story: Digital storytelling as public engagement around abortion rights advocacy in Ireland. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2018-April (4 2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173931Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Patrick Olivier and Peter Wright. 2015. Digital civics: taking a local turn. Interactions 22, 4 (6 2015), 61–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2776885Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Andrea G. Parker, Vasudhara Kantroo, Hee Rin Lee, Miguel Osornio, Mansi Sharma, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2012. Health promotion as activism: Building community capacity to effect social change. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2012), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Patricia D. Siplon. 2014. Once you know, you are responsible: the road from scholar to activist. Journal of health politics, policy and law 39, 2 (4 2014), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2416361Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Supreme Court of the United States. 2021. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Clara Crivellaro, Christopher A. Le Dantec, Eric Gordon, Pete Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2016. Digital Civics: Citizen Empowerment With and Through Technology. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 07-12-May-2016. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1096–1099. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2886436Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. “I Don't Need a Megaphone to Be Helpful”: Probing the Role of Technology in Pro-Choice Abortion Activism

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      October 2023
      596 pages
      ISBN:9798400701290
      DOI:10.1145/3584931

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)95
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format