skip to main content
10.1145/3584931.3606994acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robotic Systems in Heritage Protection: An Anti-Fatigue Human-Robot Collaboration Exploration for Heritage Painting and Calligraphy Restoration

Published:14 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The heritage restoration of paintings and calligraphy is a labour-intensive process, characterised by repetitive, low-intensity, and high-precision. Two core steps, “lift up the previous” and “fix and maintain”, can lead to muscle fatigue in the upper limbs. In this paper, we develop a human-in-the-loop based human-robot collaboration system that provides real-time force feedback to restorers based on their muscle load and motion intention, with the support strength changing to relieve fatigue. Different robot-aided positions on human arm are explored and a two-point elbow-supporting mechanism is evaluated as the optimal solution. Moreover, a novel muscle load calculation model is developed to integrate human factors into the HRC system with electromyography. The results of a usability experiment show the effectiveness of the proposed method in addressing the current anti-fatigue challenge in heritage paintings and calligraphy restoration.

References

  1. Achmamad Abdelouahad, Abdelali Belkhou, Atman Jbari, and Larbi Bellarbi. 2018. Time and frequency parameters of sEMG signal — Force relationship. In 2018 4th International Conference on Optimization and Applications (ICOA). IEEE, Mohammedia, Morocco, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOA.2018.8370547Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. O. Andrade and C. I. Andrade. 2012. On the relationship between features extracted from EMG and force for constant and dynamic protocols. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, San Diego, CA, USA, 3392–3395. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346693Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Barani, S. Poornapushpakala, M. Subramoniam, T. Vijayashree, and K. Sudheera. 2022. Analysis on Image Restoration of Ancient Paintings. In 2022 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI). IEEE, Chennai, India, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCAI53970.2022.9752613Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Bartuzi and D. Roman-Liu. 2014. Assessment of muscle load and fatigue with the usage of frequency and time-frequency analysis of the EMG signal. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics Vol. 16, nr 2 (2014), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.5277/abb140204Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Luzheng Bi, Aberham >Genetu Feleke, and Cuntai Guan. 2019. A review on EMG-based motor intention prediction of continuous human upper limb motion for human-robot collaboration. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 51 (2019), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2019.02.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Marco Ceccarelli, Francisco Blanco-Moreno, Giuseppe Carbone, Pilar Roig, Michela Cigola, and Jose Luis Regidor. 2015. A Robotic Solution for the Restoration of Fresco Paintings. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 12, 11 (2015), 160. https://doi.org/10.5772/61757 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.5772/61757Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. EunJeong Cheon, Cristina Zaga, Hee Rin Lee, Maria Luce Lupetti, Lynn Dombrowski, and Malte F. Jung. 2021. Human-Machine Partnerships in the Future of Work: Exploring the Role of Emerging Technologies in Future Workplaces. In Companion Publication of the 2021 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Virtual Event, USA) (CSCW ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 323–326. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462204.3481726Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ho Seon Choi and Hyunki In. 2022. The effects of operating height and the passage of time on the end-point performance of fine manipulative tasks that require high accuracy. Frontiers in Physiology 13 (2022), 944866. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.944866Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Neo Christopher Chung. 2021. Human in the Loop for Machine Creativity. CoRR abs/2110.03569 (2021). arXiv:2110.03569https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.03569Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mario Cifrek, Vladimir Medved, Stanko Tonković, and Saša Ostojić. 2009. Surface EMG based muscle fatigue evaluation in biomechanics. Clinical Biomechanics 24, 4 (2009), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.01.010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mark A. Fehlberg, Brian T. Gleeson, Levi C. Leishman, and William R. Provancher. 2010. Active Handrest for precision manipulation and ergonomic support. In 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium. IEEE, Waltham, MA, USA, 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1109/HAPTIC.2010.5444613Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Garrick N. Forman, Michael W. Sonne, Aaron M. Kociolek, David A. Gabriel, and Michael W.R. Holmes. 2022. Influence of muscle fatigue on motor task performance of the hand and wrist: A systematic review. Human Movement Science 81 (2022), 102912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2021.102912Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kyungsik Han, Patrick C. Shih, Mary Beth Rosson, and John M. Carroll. 2014. Enhancing Community Awareness of and Participation in Local Heritage with a Mobile Application. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (CSCW ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1144–1155. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Varun Kanal, Maher Abujelala, James Brady, Glenn Wylie, and Fillia Makedon. 2020. Adaptive Robotic Rehabilitation Using Muscle Fatigue as a Trigger. In Proceedings of the 16th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (Houston, Texas, USA) (MobiQuitous ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/3360774.3360789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cliff Lampe, Bob Bauer, Henry Evans, Dave Robson, Tessa Lau, and Leila Takayama. 2016. Robots As Cooperative Partners... We Hope.... In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 188–192. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2893360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Regan Lee Mandryk. 2004. Using Physiological Indicators as Metrics of Collaboration. In CSCW Workshop on Methodologies for Evaluating Collaboration in Co-Located Environments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Alison C. McDonald, Daanish M. Mulla, and Peter J. Keir. 2019. Muscular and kinematic adaptations to fatiguing repetitive upper extremity work. Applied Ergonomics 75 (2019), 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. K Mohanavelu, R Lamshe, S Poonguzhali, K Adalarasu, and M Jagannath. 2017. Assessment of human fatigue during physical performance using physiological signals: a review. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal 10, 4 (2017), 1887–1896. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. F. Sherwani, Muhammad Mujtaba Asad, and B.S.K.K. Ibrahim. 2020. Collaborative Robots and Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR 4.0). In 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Smart Technologies (ICETST). IEEE, Karachi, Pakistan, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETST49965.2020.9080724Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Göran Sigholm, Peter Herberts, Christian Almström, and Roland Kadefors. 1983. Electromyographic analysis of shoulder muscle load. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 1, 4 (1983), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100010406 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jor.1100010406Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Janette L. Smith, Peter G. Martin, Simon C. Gandevia, and Janet L. Taylor. 2007. Sustained contraction at very low forces produces prominent supraspinal fatigue in human elbow flexor muscles. Journal of Applied Physiology 103, 2 (2007), 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00220.2007 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00220.2007PMID: 17463302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Keisuke Sugiyama, Jinxian Qiu, and Hisashi Hakamata. 2014. Paper lining: Techniques based on Knowledge and Experience. Studies in Conservation 59, sup1 (2014), S145–S148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Weerasak Tapanya, Rungthip Puntumetakul, Manida Swangnetr Neubert, Torkamol Hunsawong, and Rose Boucaut. 2021. Ergonomic arm support prototype device for smartphone users reduces neck and shoulder musculoskeletal loading and fatigue. Applied Ergonomics 95 (2021), 103458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103458Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Wenjie Wang, Xiansheng Qin, Chen Zheng, Hongbo Wang, Jin Li, and Niu Junlong. 2018. Comfort Evaluation Model for Gesture Motion based on Mechanical Energy Expenditure and Efficiency. Procedia CIRP 78 (2018), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.323 6th CIRP Global Web Conference – Envisaging the future manufacturing, design, technologies and systems in innovation era (CIRPe 2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Song Wei. 2014. Research on hierarchical image restoration of Chinese painting. In 2014 9th International Conference on Computer Science & Education. IEEE, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 663–666. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2014.6926544Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhenzhen Zhang, Kangning Xiong, and Denghong Huang. 2023. Natural world heritage conservation and tourism: a review. Heritage Science 11, 1 (2023), 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-00896-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Robotic Systems in Heritage Protection: An Anti-Fatigue Human-Robot Collaboration Exploration for Heritage Painting and Calligraphy Restoration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
      October 2023
      596 pages
      ISBN:9798400701290
      DOI:10.1145/3584931

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate2,235of8,521submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CSCW '24
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)99
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format