skip to main content
10.1145/3584931.3608436acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel

Divesting from Big Tech: Alternative Possibilities for Research and Futuring in Social Computing

Published: 14 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The CSCW community’s research has traditionally supported by large technology companies such as Google, Meta, or Microsoft. This is not only limited to financial support: our sites of research and our design initiatives have also traditionally included these large corporations, their platforms, and their services. This panel brings together people working on questions of social computing and distributed collaboration outside of Big Tech companies–whether by fostering community work and activism, crafting legistlation, seeking alternative funding streams, leading unionization or federated ventures, or promoting alternative ways of interacting digitally. Panelists will consider how CSCW research can and should consider alternative sources of support and sites of influence, how imbrication with specific technologies developed by Google, Meta or Twitter has shaped our findings about "social" technologies, issues in system design and maintenance outside of the Big Tech ecosystem, how to engage with regulatory stakeholders to enact change, and how to work productively outside of platform capitalism. With increasing public concern over the power of large technology companies and public gaffes with respect to once-trusted corporate infrastructures, the panelists show what we gain and lose analytically, practically, and in terms of sociotechnical futuring when CSCW practitioners look beyond the Big Tech ecosystem.

References

[1]
Veronica Abebe, Gagik Amaryan, Marina Beshai, Ilene, Ali Ekin Gurgen, Wendy Ho, Naaji R. Hylton, Daniel Kim, Christy Lee, Carina Lewandowski, Katherine T. Miller, Lindsey A. Moore, Rachel Sylwester, Ethan Thai, Frelicia N. Tucker, Toussaint Webb, Dorothy Zhao, Haicheng Charles Zhao, and Janet Vertesi. 2022. Anti-Racist HCI: notes on an emerging critical technical practice. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3516382
[2]
Susan Benesch. 2021. Nobody Can See Into Facebook. The Atlantic (Oct. 2021). https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/10/facebook-oversight-data-independent-research/620557/ Section: Ideas.
[3]
Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code (1 edition ed.). Polity, Medford, MA.
[4]
Elizabeth Popp Berman. 2012. Creating the market university: how academic science became an economic engine. Princeton University Press, Princeton [N.J.].
[5]
Charlie DeTar. 2016. On Selling Out. MIT Media Lab (2016).
[6]
Sucheta Ghoshal, Rishma Mendhekar, and Amy Bruckman. 2020. Toward a Grassroots Culture of Technology Practice. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1, Article 54 (may 2020), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392862
[7]
Amy A. Hasinoff and Nathan Schneider. 2022. From Scalability to Subsidiarity in Addressing Online Harm. Social Media+ Society 8, 3 (2022), 20563051221126041. Publisher: SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.
[8]
Charles Kiene, Jialun Aaron Jiang, and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2019. Technological Frames and User Innovation: Exploring Technological Change in Community Moderation Teams. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (Nov 2019), 44:1–44:23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359146
[9]
Kristen Lovejoy and Gregory D. Saxton. 2012. Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, 3 (Apr 2012), 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
[10]
J. Nathan Matias. 2020. Why We Need Industry-Independent Research on Tech & Society. https://citizensandtech.org/2020/01/industry-independent-research/
[11]
J. Nathan Matias. 2023. To Hold Tech Accountable, Look to Public Health. WIRED (March 2023). https://www.wired.com/story/tech-governance-public-health/
[12]
J. Nathan Matias and Merry Mou. 2018. CivilServant: Community-Led Experiments in Platform Governance. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 9.
[13]
J. Nathan Matias, Rebekah Tromble, David Lazer, Susan Benesch, Alex Abdo, Nathalie Maréchal, Ethan Zuckerman, David Karpf, James Mickens, and Brandi Geurkink. 2022. Manifesto: Coalition for Independent Tech Research. (March 2022). https://independenttechresearch.org/coalition-for-independent-technology-research-founding-document/ Publisher: OSF.
[14]
Safiya Umoja Noble. 2017. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press, New York.
[15]
Ihudiya Finda Ogbonnaya-Ogburu, Angela D.R. Smith, Alexandra To, and Kentaro Toyama. 2020. Critical Race Theory for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376392
[16]
Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Bloomsbury Press, London.
[17]
Janet A Vertesi. 2015. How Evasion Matters: Implications from Surfacing Data Tracking Online. Interface 1, 1 (2015), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.7710/2373-4914.1013
[18]
Amy Voida, Ellie Harmon, and Ban Al-Ani. 2011. Homebrew databases: complexities of everyday information management in nonprofit organizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 915–924. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979078
[19]
Meredith Whittaker. 2021. The steep cost of capture. Interactions 28, 6 (2021), 50–55. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3488666 Publisher: ACM New York, NY, USA.
[20]
Tom Wilson and Kate Starbird. 2021. Cross-platform Information Operations: Mobilizing Narratives and Building Resilience through both “Big” and “Alt” Tech. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (Oct 2021), 345:1–345:32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3476086
[21]
Richmond Y. Wong. 2021. Tactics of Soft Resistance in User Experience Professionals’ Values Work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (Oct 2021), 355:1–355:28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479499
[22]
Meg Young, Michael Katell, and P. M. Krafft. 2022. Confronting Power and Corporate Capture at the FAccT Conference. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 1375–1386.
[23]
Shoshana Zuboff. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (1st edition ed.). PublicAffairs, New York.

Index Terms

  1. Divesting from Big Tech: Alternative Possibilities for Research and Futuring in Social Computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    October 2023
    596 pages
    ISBN:9798400701290
    DOI:10.1145/3584931
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 October 2023

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Big Tech
    2. alternative technologies
    3. divestment

    Qualifiers

    • Panel
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CSCW '23
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 129
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)71
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 20 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media