skip to main content
10.1145/3584931.3611280acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Epistemic Injustice in Online Communities: Unpacking the Values of Knowledge Creation and Curation within CSCW Applications

Published: 14 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Information flows are pervasive on the internet and often have a low entry barrier. From an epistemological perspective, information evolves into knowledge. For example, information about mental health on TikTok can act as actionable knowledge for someone seeking to improve their mental health. However, social computing has long known that people do not interact with knowledge cleanly, especially in digital environments. While knowledge curation is essential for targeting irrelevant, biased, or even harmful information, it is value-laden; in choosing how to present information, we undermine non-traditional information such as personal experiences. In this workshop, we will bring together researchers from academia, industry, and marginalized communities to discuss how current CSCW applications contribute to the systemic silencing, exclusion, or delegitimization of certain knowledge contributions (i.e., epistemic injustice). We will diagram our own mental models of how knowledge is created and curated and reflect on critical questions to orient the design of inclusive knowledge spaces online, particularly with topics that blend personal experience with factual information, such as mental health.

References

[1]
Judd Antin, Raymond Yee, Coye Cheshire, and Oded Nov. 2011. Gender differences in Wikipedia editing. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (Mountain View, California) (WikiSym ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–14.
[2]
Jon Barwise. 2016. Three Views of Common Knowledge. In Readings in Formal Epistemology: Sourcebook, Horacio Arló-Costa, Vincent F Hendricks, and Johan van Benthem (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 759–772.
[3]
Torie Bosch. 2012. How Kate Middleton’s Wedding Gown Demonstrates Wikipedia’s Woman Problem. https://slate.com/technology/2012/07/kate-middleton-s-wedding-gown-and-wikipedia-s-gender-gap.html. Accessed: 2023-5-4.
[4]
Stevie Chancellor, Andrea Hu, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2018. Norms Matter: Contrasting Social Support Around Behavior Change in Online Weight Loss Communities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18, Paper 666). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14.
[5]
Benjamin Collier and Julia Bear. 2012. Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CSCW ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 383–392.
[6]
Andrea J Copeland and Denise E Agosto. 2012. Diagrams and Relational Maps: The Use of Graphic Elicitation Techniques with Interviewing for Data Collection, Analysis, and Display. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11, 5 (Dec. 2012), 513–533.
[7]
Michael Ann DeVito. 2022. How Transfeminine TikTok Creators Navigate the Algorithmic Trap of Visibility Via Folk Theorization. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1–31.
[8]
M A DeVito, A M Walker, and J Birnholtz. 2018. ’Too Gay for Facebook’ Presenting LGBTQ+ Identity Throughout the Personal Social Media Ecosystem. Proceedings of the ACM on Human (2018).
[9]
M A DeVito, A M Walker, and J R Fernandez. 2021. Values (mis) alignment: Exploring tensions between platform and LGBTQ+ community design values. of the ACM on Human-Computer … (2021).
[10]
Michael Doan. 2018. Resisting Structural Epistemic Injustice. FPQ 4, 4 (Dec. 2018).
[11]
Miranda Fricker. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. (June 2007).
[12]
Oliver L Haimson, Avery Dame-Griff, Elias Capello, and Zahari Richter. 2021. Tumblr was a trans technology: the meaning, importance, history, and future of trans technologies. Feminist Media Studies 21, 3 (April 2021), 345–361.
[13]
Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Fem. Stud. 14, 3 (1988), 575–599.
[14]
Amelia Hassoun, Ian Beacock, Sunny Consolvo, Beth Goldberg, Patrick Gage Kelley, and Daniel M Russell. 2023. Practicing Information Sensibility: How Gen Z Engages with Online Information. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23, Article 662). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17.
[15]
Mo Houtti, Isaac Johnson, Joel Cepeda, Soumya Khandelwal, Aviral Bhatnagar, and Loren Terveen. 2022. “we need a woman in music”: Exploring Wikipedia’s values on article priority. Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1–28.
[16]
Andrew Lih. 2009. The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World’s Greatest Encyclopedia. Hachette Books.
[17]
B McInnis, L Ajmani, L Sun, Y Hou, Z Zeng, and others. 2021. Reporting the Community Beat: Practices for Moderating Online Discussion at a News Website. Proceedings of the ACM (2021).
[18]
Amanda Menking and Jon Rosenberg. 2021. WP:NOT, WP:NPOV, and other stories Wikipedia tells us: A feminist critique of Wikipedia’s epistemology. Sci. Technol. Human Values 46, 3 (May 2021), 455–479.
[19]
Ashlee Milton, Leah Ajmani, Michael Ann DeVito, and Stevie Chancellor. 2023. “I See Me Here”: Mental Health Content, Community, and Algorithmic Curation on TikTok. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23, Article 480). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17.
[20]
Julian E Orr. 1990. Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service culture. Collective remembering. 230 (1990), 169–189.
[21]
V Pandey, T Koul, C Yang, D McDonald, and others. 2021. Galileo: Citizen-led experimentation using a social computing system. Proceedings of the (2021).
[22]
Jennifer Pierre, Roderic Crooks, Morgan Currie, Britt Paris, and Irene Pasquetto. 2021. Getting Ourselves Together: Data-centered participatory design research & epistemic burden. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21, Article 406). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11.
[23]
Adi Robertson. 2015. Wikipedia denies ’purging’ feminist editors over Gamergate debate. https://www.theverge.com/2015/1/28/7927425/wikipedia-bans-gamergate-editors-violating-policies. Accessed: 2022-12-6.
[24]
Jeremy Roschelle and Stephanie D Teasley. 1995. The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving. In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 69–97.
[25]
A M Walker and M A DeVito. 2020. “’More gay’fits in better”: Intracommunity Power Dynamics and Harms in Online LGBTQ+ Spaces. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on (2020).
[26]
Zhijun Yan, Tianmei Wang, Yi Chen, and Han Zhang. 2016. Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective. Information & Management 53, 5 (July 2016), 643–653.

Index Terms

  1. Epistemic Injustice in Online Communities: Unpacking the Values of Knowledge Creation and Curation within CSCW Applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '23 Companion: Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
    October 2023
    596 pages
    ISBN:9798400701290
    DOI:10.1145/3584931
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 October 2023

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. epistemic justice
    2. online communities
    3. peer production

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CSCW '23
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 150
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)87
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media