skip to main content
10.1145/3586183.3606734acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

RadarVR: Exploring Spatiotemporal Visual Guidance in Cinematic VR

Published:29 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In cinematic VR, viewers can only see a limited portion of the scene at any time. As a result, they may miss important events outside their field of view. While there are many techniques which offer spatial guidance (where to look), there has been little work on temporal guidance (when to look). Temporal guidance offers viewers a look-ahead time and allows viewers to plan their head motion for important events. This paper introduces spatiotemporal visual guidance and presents a new widget, RadarVR, which shows both spatial and temporal information of regions of interest (ROIs) in a video. Using RadarVR, we conducted a study to investigate the impact of temporal guidance and explore trade-offs between spatiotemporal and spatial-only visual guidance. Results show spatiotemporal feedback allows users to see a greater percentage of ROIs, with 81% more seen from their initial onset. We discuss design implications for future work in this space.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

UIST23_RadarVR_Video_Preview.mp4

mp4

26.3 MB

UIST23_RadarVR_Video_Presentation.mp4

mp4

159.5 MB

References

  1. Activision. 2007. Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. [Playstation 3].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcove VR. 2022. 360 3D MARSEILLE, FRANCE - Guided Tour - Virtual Travel 4K (Full series on Alcove for Quest). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gURIhqukTSQ. Copyright 2022 by Alcove VR. Reprinted with permission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Patrick Baudisch and Ruth Rosenholtz. 2003. Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 481–488.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carlo Bonferroni. 1936. Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilita. Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commericiali di Firenze 8 (1936), 3–62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Felix Bork, Christian Schnelzer, Ulrich Eck, and Nassir Navab. 2018. Towards Efficient Visual Guidance in Limited Field-of-View Head-Mounted Displays. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 11 (2018), 2983–2992. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2868584Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jessica Brillhart. 2016. In the Blink of a Mind — Attention. https://medium.com/the-language-of-vr/in-the-blink-of-a-mind-attention-1fdff60fa045 [Online; posted 05-Feb-2016].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gerd Bruder, Frank Steinicke, Phil Wieland, and Markus Lappe. 2012. Tuning Self-Motion Perception in Virtual Reality with Visual Illusions. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 18, 7 (July 2012), 1068–1078. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.274Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Stefano Burigat, Luca Chittaro, and Silvia Gabrielli. 2006. Visualizing Locations of Off-Screen Objects on Mobile Devices: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Approaches. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (Helsinki, Finland) (MobileHCI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1145/1152215.1152266Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Chong Cao, Zhaowei Shi, and Miao Yu. 2020. Automatic Generation of Diegetic Guidance in Cinematic Virtual Reality. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 600–607. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR50242.2020.00087Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Nina Doerr, Katrin Angerbauer, Melissa Reinelt, and Michael Sedlmair. 2023. Bees, Birds and Butterflies: Investigating the Influence of Distractors on Visual Attention Guidance Techniques. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 51, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585816Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Beat Games. 2018. Beat Saber. [Meta Quest].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Beat Games. 2019. Beat Saber. [Meta Quest].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rockstar Games. 2008. Grand Theft Auto IV. [Playstation 3].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Google. 2008. Google Maps. https://www.google.com/mapsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Google Spotlight Stories. 2016. 360 Google Spotlight Stories: HELP. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-XZhKqQAHU.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Steve Grogorick, Georgia Albuquerque, and Marcus A. Magnor. 2018. Comparing Unobtrusive Gaze Guiding Stimuli in Head-Mounted Displays. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2018, Athens, Greece, October 7-10, 2018. IEEE, Athens, Greece, 2805–2809. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2018.8451784Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Steve Grogorick, Jan-Philipp Tauscher, Nikkel Heesen, Susana Castillo, and Marcus Magnor. 2020. Stereo Inverse Brightness Modulation for Guidance in Dynamic Panorama Videos in Virtual Reality. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 39. Wiley Online Library, 542–553.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Uwe Gruenefeld, Abdallah El Ali, Susanne Boll, and Wilko Heuten. 2018. Beyond Halo and Wedge: Visualizing out-of-View Objects on Head-Mounted Virtual and Augmented Reality Devices(MobileHCI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 40, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229438Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Uwe Gruenefeld, Dag Ennenga, Abdallah El Ali, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2017. EyeSee360: Designing a Visualization Technique for out-of-View Objects in Head-Mounted Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Brighton, United Kingdom) (SUI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131277.3132175Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Uwe Gruenefeld, Ilja Koethe, Daniel Lange, Sebastian Weiß, and Wilko Heuten. 2019. Comparing Techniques for Visualizing Moving Out-of-View Objects in Head-mounted Virtual Reality. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 742–746. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797725Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jan Gugenheimer, Dennis Wolf, Gabriel Haas, Sebastian Krebs, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016. SwiVRChair: A Motorized Swivel Chair to Nudge Users’ Orientation for 360 Degree Storytelling in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1996–2000. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858040Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sean Gustafson, Patrick Baudisch, Carl Gutwin, and Pourang Irani. 2008. Wedge: clutter-free visualization of off-screen locations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 787–796.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Harmonix. 2005. Guitar Hero. [Playstation 2].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (Eds.). Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52. North-Holland, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Indie Film School. 2016. Pokèmon 360 - CATCH ’EM ALL in VR!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pHUVS_GrIeM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Benjamin Jakobs. 2019. Die Entwickler des VR-Hits Beat Saber gehören jetzt zu Facebook. https://www.eurogamer.de/die-entwickler-des-vr-hits-beat-saber-gehoeren-jetzt-zu-facebookGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Oliver Beren Kaul and Michael Rohs. 2017. HapticHead: A Spherical Vibrotactile Grid around the Head for 3D Guidance in Virtual and Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3729–3740. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Joona Kinnunen. 2018. Spatial guiding through haptic cues in omnidirectional video. Master’s thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Konami. 1998. Dance Dance Revolution. [Arcade].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Daniel Lange, Tim Claudius Stratmann, Uwe Gruenefeld, and Susanne Boll. 2020. HiveFive: Immersion Preserving Attention Guidance in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376803Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jiannan Li, Jiahe Lyu, Mauricio Sousa, Ravin Balakrishnan, Anthony Tang, and Tovi Grossman. 2021. Route tapestries: Navigating 360 virtual tour videos using slit-scan visualizations. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 223–238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Klemen Lilija, Henning Pohl, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2020. Who put that there? temporal navigation of spatial recordings by direct manipulation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Yen-Chen Lin, Yung-Ju Chang, Hou-Ning Hu, Hsien-Tzu Cheng, Chi-Wen Huang, and Min Sun. 2017. Tell Me Where to Look: Investigating Ways for Assisting Focus in 360° Video. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2535–2545. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025757Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Yung-Ta Lin, Yi-Chi Liao, Shan-Yuan Teng, Yi-Ju Chung, Liwei Chan, and Bing-Yu Chen. 2017. Outside-In: Visualizing Out-of-Sight Regions-of-Interest in a 360° Video Using Spatial Picture-in-Picture Previews. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Québec City, QC, Canada) (UIST ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126656Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Sean J. Liu, Maneesh Agrawala, Stephen DiVerdi, and Aaron Hertzmann. 2019. View-dependent video textures for 360° video. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 249–262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sandy Louchart and Ruth Aylett. 2003. Solving the Narrative Paradox in VEs – Lessons from RPGs. In Intelligent Virtual Agents, Thomas Rist, Ruth S. Aylett, Daniel Ballin, and Jeff Rickel (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 244–248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Andrew MacQuarrie and Anthony Steed. 2017. Cinematic virtual reality: Evaluating the effect of display type on the viewing experience for panoramic video. In 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2017.7892230Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Carlos Marañes, Diego Gutierrez, and Ana Serrano. 2020. Exploring the impact of 360 movie cuts in users’ attention. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 73–82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Carlos Marañes, Diego Gutierrez, and Ana Serrano. 2022. Towards assisting the decision-making process for content creators in cinematic virtual reality through the analysis of movie cuts and their influence on viewers’ behavior. International Transactions in Operational Research (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Belen Masia, Javier Camon, Diego Gutierrez, and Ana Serrano. 2021. Influence of Directional Sound Cues on Users’ Exploration Across 360° Movie Cuts. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 41, 4 (2021), 64–75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. James McCrae, Michael Glueck, Tovi Grossman, Azam Khan, and Karan Singh. 2010. Exploring the Design Space of Multiscale 3D Orientation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Roma, Italy) (AVI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/1842993.1843008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. James McCrae, Igor Mordatch, Michael Glueck, and Azam Khan. 2009. Multiscale 3D Navigation. In Proceedings of the 2009 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games (Boston, Massachusetts) (I3D ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/1507149.1507151Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. National Geographic. 2018. Elephant Encounter in 360 - Ep. 2 | The Okavango Experience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI7mTIxNotQ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Cuong Nguyen, Stephen DiVerdi, Aaron Hertzmann, and Feng Liu. 2017. Vremiere: In-headset virtual reality video editing. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5428–5438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Lasse T. Nielsen, Matias B. Møller, Sune D. Hartmeyer, Troels C. M. Ljung, Niels C. Nilsson, Rolf Nordahl, and Stefania Serafin. 2016. Missing the Point: An Exploration of How to Guide Users’ Attention during Cinematic Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Conference on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Munich, Germany) (VRST ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993369.2993405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Orbitian Media. 2022. One Day in London - VR/360° guided city tour (8K resolution). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_4_gdbltyM. Copyright 2022 by Orbitian Media: https://orbitian.media. Reprinted with permission.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Amy Pavel, Björn Hartmann, and Maneesh Agrawala. 2017. Shot orientation controls for interactive cinematography with 360 video. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 289–297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. RenderHeads. 2022. AVPro Video. https://www.renderheads.com/content/docs/AVProVideo/articles/intro.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Sylvia Rothe, Felix Althammer, and Mohamed Khamis. 2018. GazeRecall: Using Gaze Direction to Increase Recall of Details in Cinematic Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Cairo, Egypt) (MUM 2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1145/3282894.3282903Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Sylvia Rothe, Daniel Buschek, and Heinrich Hußmann. 2019. Guidance in Cinematic Virtual Reality-Taxonomy, Research Status and Challenges. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3010019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Sylvia Rothe and Heinrich Hußmann. 2018. Guiding the viewer in cinematic virtual reality by diegetic cues. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics. Springer, 101–117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. School of Rock the Musical. 2015. SCHOOL OF ROCK: The Musical – “You’re in the Band” (360 Video). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFRPXRhBYOI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Ana Serrano, Vincent Sitzmann, Jaime Ruiz-Borau, Gordon Wetzstein, Diego Gutierrez, and Belen Masia. 2017. Movie Editing and Cognitive Event Segmentation in Virtual Reality Video. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4, Article 47 (jul 2017), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Alia Sheikh, Andy Brown, Zillah Watson, and Michael Evans. 2016. Directing attention in 360-degree video. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Shakeeb Shirazi. 2018. Timeline visualization of omnidirectional videos. Master’s thesis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Vincent Sitzmann, Ana Serrano, Amy Pavel, Maneesh Agrawala, Diego Gutierrez, Belen Masia, and Gordon Wetzstein. 2017. How do people explore virtual environments?IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Marco Speicher, Christoph Rosenberg, Donald Degraen, Florian Daiber, and Antonio Krúger. 2019. Exploring Visual Guidance in 360-Degree Videos. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (Salford (Manchester), United Kingdom) (TVX ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3317697.3323350Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. TL;DR Media. 2023. Simple Radar for Counter-Strike. https://readtldr.gg/simpleradarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Jan Oliver Wallgrün, Mahda M. Bagher, Pejman Sajjadi, and Alexander Klippel. 2020. A Comparison of Visual Attention Guiding Approaches for 360° Image-Based VR Tours. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR46266.2020.00026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Robert F Woolson. 2007. Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Wiley encyclopedia of clinical trials (2007), 1–3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Stefanie Zollmann, Tobias Langlotz, Raphael Grasset, Wei Hong Lo, Shohei Mori, and Holger Regenbrecht. 2021. Visualization Techniques in Augmented Reality: A Taxonomy, Methods and Patterns. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 9 (2021), 3808–3825. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.2986247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. RadarVR: Exploring Spatiotemporal Visual Guidance in Cinematic VR

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              UIST '23: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
              October 2023
              1825 pages
              ISBN:9798400701320
              DOI:10.1145/3586183

              Copyright © 2023 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 29 October 2023

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

              Upcoming Conference

              UIST '24
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)294
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)50

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format