research-article

A Rubik's Cube Cryptosystem-based Authentication and Session Key Generation Model Driven in Blockchain Environment for IoT Security

Authors:
Ankit Attkan

Department of Computer Engineering, NIT Kurukshetra, Kurukshetra, India

Department of Computer Engineering, NIT Kurukshetra, Kurukshetra, India

0000-0001-7898-3922
View Profile

,
Virender Ranga

Department of Information Technology, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India

Department of Information Technology, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India

0000-0002-2046-8642
View Profile

,
Priyanka Ahlawat

Department of Computer Engineering, NIT Kurukshetra, Kurukshetra, India

Department of Computer Engineering, NIT Kurukshetra, Kurukshetra, India

0000-0003-4695-382X
View Profile

Authors Info & Claims

ACM Transactions on Internet of Things Volume 4 Issue 2Article No.: 14pp 1–39https://doi.org/10.1145/3586578

Published:12 May 2023Publication History

ACM Transactions on Internet of Things

Abstract

Over the past decade, IoT has gained huge momentum in terms of technological exploration, integration, and its various applications even after having a resource-bound architecture. It is challenging to run any high-end security protocol(s) on Edge devices. These devices are highly vulnerable toward numerous cyber-attacks. IoT network nodes need peer-to-peer security, which is possible if there exists proper mutual authentication among network devices. A secure session key needs to be established among source and destination nodes before sending the sensitive data. To generate these session keys, a strong cryptosystem is required to share parameters securely over a wireless network. In this article, we utilize a Rubik's cube puzzle-based cryptosystem to exchange parameters among peers and generate session key(s). Blockchain technology is incorporated in the proposed model to provide anonymity of token transactions, on the basis of which the network devices exchange services. A session key pool randomizer is used to avoid network probabilistic attacks. Our hybrid model is capable of generating secure session keys that can be used for mutual authentication and reliable data transferring tasks. Cyber-attacks resistance and performance results were verified using standard tools, which gave industry level promising results in terms of efficiency, light weightiness, and practical applications.

REFERENCES

[1] Lan L., Shi R., Wang B., and Zhang L.. 2019. An iot unified access platform for heterogeneity sensing devices based on edge computing. IEEE access 7 (2019), 44199–44211.Google ScholarCross Ref
[2] Vogt H.. 2002. Efficient object identification with passive RFID tags. In The International Conference on Pervasive Computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 98–113.Google Scholar
[3] Dwivedi A. D., Srivastava G., Dhar S., and Singh R.. 2019. A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for IoT. Sensors 19, 2 (2019), 326.Google ScholarCross Ref
[4] Dorri A., Kanhere S. S., Jurdak R., and Gauravaram P.. 2017. Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom workshops). IEEE, 618–623.Google ScholarCross Ref
[5] Celik Z. B., Babun L., Sikder A. K., Aksu H., Tan G., McDaniel P., and Uluagac A. S.. 2018. Sensitive information tracking in commodity IoT. In Proceedings of the 27th {USENIX} Security Symposium ({USENIX} Security 18). 1687–1704.Google Scholar
[6] Alam M. E., Kader M. A., Parvin R., Sultana S., Sultana Z., and Muhammad S. D.. 2021. IoT based biometric seat reservation and transport management system for university bus. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST). IEEE, 649–653.Google Scholar
[7] El-Haii M., Chamoun M., Fadlallah A., and Serhrouchni A.. 2018. Analysis of cryptographic algorithms on iot hardware platforms. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd Cyber Security in Networking Conference (CSNet). IEEE, 1–5.Google Scholar
[8] Soe Y. N., Feng Y., Santosa P. I., Hartanto R., and Sakurai K.. 2020. Towards a lightweight detection system for cyber attacks in the IoT environment using corresponding features. Electronics 9, 1 (2020), 144.Google ScholarCross Ref
[9] Melki R., Noura H. N., and Chehab A.. 2020. Lightweight multi-factor mutual authentication protocol for IoT devices. International Journal of Information Security 19, 6 (2020), 679–694.Google ScholarDigital Library
[10] Yan Z., Zhang P., and Vasilakos A. V.. 2014. A survey on trust management for the Internet of Things. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 42 (2014), 120–134. Google ScholarCross Ref
[11] Collina M., Corazza G. E., and Vanelli-Coralli A.. 2012. Introducing the QEST broker: Scaling the IoT by bridging MQTT and REST. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications-(PIMRC). IEEE, 36–41.Google Scholar
[12] Mahendran R. K., Prabhu V., Parthasarathy V., Thirunavukkarasu U., and Jagadeesan S.. 2021. An energy-efficient centralized dynamic time scheduling for internet of healthcare things. Measurement 186 (2021), 110230. Google ScholarCross Ref
[13] Tournier J., Lesueur F., Le Mouël F., Guyon L., and Ben-Hassine H.. 2021. A survey of IoT protocols and their security issues through the lens of a generic IoT stack. Internet of Things 16 (2021), 100264. Google ScholarCross Ref
[14] Ferrag M. A., Shu L., Djallel H., and Choo K. K. R.. 2021. Deep Learning-Based intrusion detection for distributed denial of service attack in agriculture 4.0. Electronics 10, 11 (2021), 1257.Google ScholarCross Ref
[15] Agiollo A., Conti M., Kaliyar P., Lin T.-N., and Pajola L.. 2021. DETONAR: Detection of routing attacks in RPL-based IoT. In IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management 18, 2 (2021), 1178--1190. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[16] Liu X., Zeng Q., Du X., Valluru S. L., Fu C., Fu X., and Luo B.. 2021. SniffMislead: Non-Intrusive privacy protection against wireless packet sniffers in smart homes. In Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Research in Attacks, Intrusions and Defenses. 33–47.Google ScholarDigital Library
[17] Kim W. B., and Lee I. Y.. 2021. Survey on data deduplication in cloud storage environments. Journal of Information Processing Systems 173 (2021), 658–673.Google Scholar
[18] Da Xu L., Lu Y., and Li L.. 2021. Embedding blockchain technology into IoT for security: A survey. In IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8, 13 (2021), 10452--10473. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[19] Xu C., Qu Y., Luan T. H., Eklund P. W., Xiang Y., and Gao L.. 2022. A Light-weight and attack-proof bidirectional blockchain paradigm for internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9, 6 (2022), 4371--4384. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[20] Alhejazi M. M., and Mohammad R. M. A.. 2021. Enhancing the blockchain voting process in IoT using a novel blockchain Weighted Majority Consensus Algorithm (WMCA). Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective (2021), 1–19.Google Scholar
[21] Mu R., Gong B., Ning Z., Zhang J., Cao Y., Li Z., … and Wang X.. 2022. An identity privacy scheme for blockchain-based on edge computing. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 34, 1 (2022), e6545.Google Scholar
[22] Iftikhar Z., Javed Y., Zaidi S. Y. A., Shah M. A., Iqbal Khan Z., Mussadiq S., and Abbasi K.. 2021. Privacy preservation in resource-constrained IoT devices using blockchain—A survey. Electronics 10, 14 (2021), 1732.Google ScholarCross Ref
[23] Mai T., Yao H., Zhang N., Xu L., Guizani M., and Guo S.. 2023. Cloud mining pool aided blockchain-enabled internet of things: An evolutionary game approach. In IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing 11, 1 (2023), 692--703. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[24] Siddiqui F., Beley J., Zeadally S., and Braught G.. 2021. Secure and lightweight communication in heterogeneous IoT environments. Internet of Things 14 (2021), 100093. Google ScholarCross Ref
[25] Korf R. E.. 1997. Finding optimal solutions to Rubik's Cube using pattern databases. In Proceedings of the AAAI/IAAI. 700–705.Google Scholar
[26] Singh S., Hosen A. S., and Yoon B.. 2021. Blockchain security attacks, challenges, and solutions for the future distributed IoT network. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 13938–13959. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[27] Henderson T. R., Lacage M., Riley G. F., Dowell C., and Kopena J.. 2008. Network simulations with the ns-3 simulator. SIGCOMM Demonstration 14, 14 (2008), 527.Google Scholar
[28] Österlind F., Eriksson J., and Dunkels A.. 2010. Cooja TimeLine: A power visualizer for sensor network simulation. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 385–386.Google Scholar
[29] Zamani E., He Y., and Phillips M.. 2020. On the security risks of the blockchain. Journal of Computer Information Systems 60, 6 (2020), 495–506.Google ScholarCross Ref
[30] Stergiou C. L., Psannis K. E., and Gupta B. B.. 2020. IoT-based big data secure management in the fog over a 6G wireless network. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8, 7 (2020), 5164–5171.Google Scholar
[31] Stergiou Christos L. and Psannis Kostas E.. 2022. Digital twin intelligent system for industrial ioT-based big data management and analysis in cloud. Virtual Reality & Intelligent Hardware 4, 4 (2022), 279--291. Google ScholarCross Ref
[32] Zhu X. and Jiang C.. 2021. Integrated satellite-terrestrial networks toward 6G: Architectures, applications, and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9, 1 (2021), 437–461.Google Scholar
[33] Al-Joboury I. M. and Al-Hemiary E. H.. 2020. Virtualized fog network with load balancing for IoT based Fog-to-Cloud. JOIV: International Journal on Informatics Visualization 4, 3 (2020), 123–126.Google Scholar
[34] Das D., Banerjee S., and Biswas U.. 2021. A secure vehicle theft detection framework using Blockchain and smart contract. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 14, 2 (2021), 672–686.Google Scholar
[35] Qu Q., Xu R., Chen Y., Blasch E., and Aved A.. 2021. Enable Fair Proof-of-Work (PoW) Consensus for Blockchains in IoT by Miner Twins (MinT). Future Internet 13, 11 (2021), 291.Google Scholar
[36] Sun Y., Yan B., Yao Y., and Yu J.. 2021. DT-DPoS: A delegated proof of stake consensus algorithm with dynamic trust. Procedia Computer Science 187 (2021), 371–376. Google ScholarCross Ref
[37] Maqbool A., Sattar S., Naheed A., Khalid S., Rana T., Afzal F., and Cancan M.. 2021. A comparative analysis of consensus protocols for dealing power theft issues in Pakistan. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences 42, 7 (2021), 1523–1540.Google Scholar
[38] George J. T.. 2022. Consensus algorithms for blockchains. In Introducing Blockchain Applications. A Press, Berkeley, CA, 149–161.Google Scholar
[39] Iorga M., Feldman L., Barton R., Martin M., Goren N. and Mahmoudi C.. 2018. Fog computing conceptual model, special publication (NIST SP). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, [online], Special Publication Issue (NIST SP) - 500-325, Report Number 500-325, Published March 14, 2018. . (Accessed March 31, 2023).Google ScholarCross Ref
[40] Unal D., Al-Ali A., Catak F. O., and Hammoudeh M.. 2021. A secure and efficient Internet of Things cloud encryption scheme with forensics investigation compatibility based on identity-based encryption. Future Generation Computer Systems 125 (2021), 433--445. Google ScholarDigital Library
[41] Wazid M., Das A. K., and Park Y.. 2021. Blockchain-enabled secure communication mechanism for IoT-driven personal health records. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies (2021), e4421.Google Scholar
[42] Fan Q., Chen J., Shojafar M., Kumari S., and He D.. 2022. SAKE*: A symmetric authenticated key exchange protocol with perfect forward secrecy for industrial internet of things. In IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 18, 9 (2022), 6424--6434. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[43] Kasyoka P., Kimwele M., and Mbandu Angolo S.. 2020. Certificateless pairing-free authentication scheme for wireless body area network in healthcare management system. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology 44, 1 (2020), 12–19.Google ScholarCross Ref
[44] Tan X., Zhang J., Zhang Y., Qin Z., Ding Y., and Wang X.. 2020. A PUF-based and cloud-assisted lightweight authentication for multi-hop body area networks. Tsinghua Science and Technology 26, 1 (2020), 36–47.Google Scholar
[45] Li C., Zhang J., Yang X., and Youlong L.. 2021. Lightweight blockchain consensus mechanism and storage optimization for resource-constrained IoT devices. Information Processing & Management 58, 4 (2021), 102602.Google ScholarDigital Library
[46] Bouras M. A., Lu Q., Dhelim S., and Ning H.. 2021. A lightweight blockchain-based IoT identity management approach. Future Internet 13, 2 (2021), 24.Google ScholarCross Ref
[47] Abed S. E., Jaffal R., Mohd B. J., and Al-Shayeji M.. 2021. An analysis and evaluation of lightweight hash functions for blockchain-based IoT devices. Cluster Computing 24, 4 (2021), 3065–3084.Google ScholarDigital Library
[48] Patrick S., Jannatul F., Mahbuba B., Uddin, and Shorif M.. 2021. Chaotic lightweight cryptosystem for image encryption. Advances in Multimedia, Hindawi, 1687--5680. DOI:Google ScholarDigital Library
[49] Rao V. and Prema K. V.. 2021. A review on lightweight cryptography for Internet-of-Things based applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 12, 9 (2021), 8835–8857.Google ScholarCross Ref
[50] Feng Q., He D., Wang H., Zhou L., and Choo K. K. R.. 2019. Lightweight collaborative authentication with key protection for smart electronic health record systems. IEEE Sensors Journal 20, 4 (2019), 2181–2196.Google Scholar
[51] Afianti F., Wirawan, and T. Suryani. 2019. Lightweight and DoS resistant multiuser authentication in wireless sensor networks for smart grid environments. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 67107--67122. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[52] Dar M. A., Khan U. I., and Bukhari S. N.. 2019. Lightweight session key establishment for android platform using ECC. In Advances in Computer, Communication and Control. Springer, Singapore. 347–359.Google Scholar
[53] Tamilarasi K. and Jawahar A.. 2020. Medical data security for healthcare applications using hybrid lightweight encryption and swarm optimization algorithm. Wireless Personal Communications 114, 3 (2020).Google Scholar
[54] Shen C., Zhang K., and Tang J.. 2021. A COVID-19 detection algorithm using deep features and discrete social learning particle swarm optimization for edge computing devices. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 22, 3 (2021), 1–17.Google Scholar
[55] Yang Z., Jin Y., and Hao K.. 2018. A bio-inspired self-learning coevolutionary dynamic multiobjective optimization algorithm for internet of things services. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 23, 4 (2018), 675–688.Google Scholar
[56] Bouteghrine B., Tanougast C., and Sadoudi S.. 2021. Novel image encryption algorithm based on new 3-d chaos map. Multimedia Tools and Applications (2021), 1–23.Google Scholar
[57] Shrivastava M., Roy S., Kumar K., Pandey C. V., and Grover J.. 2021. LICCA: A lightweight image cipher using 3-D cellular automata. Nonlinear Dynamics 106, 3 (2021), 2679–2702.Google ScholarCross Ref
[58] Khaitan S., Sagar S., and Agarwal R. 2021. Chaos based image encryption using 3-Dimension logistic map. Materials Today: Proceedings (2021).Google Scholar
[59] Fataf N. A. A., Rahim M. A., He S., and Banerjee S. 2021. A communication scheme based on fractional order chaotic laser for the internet of things. Internet of Things (2021), 100425.Google Scholar
[60] Zhang J., Guo M., Li B., and Lu R. 2021. A transport monitoring system for cultural relics protection based on blockchain and internet of things. Journal of Cultural Heritage 50 (2021), 106–114. Google ScholarCross Ref
[61] Ge C., Susilo W., Liu Z., Xia J., Szalachowski P., and Fang L. 2020. Secure keyword search and data sharing mechanism for cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 18, 6 (2020), 2787–2800.Google Scholar
[62] Ge C., Liu Z., Xia J., and Fang L. 2019. Revocable identity-based broadcast proxy re-encryption for data sharing in clouds. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 18, 3 (2019), 1214–1226.Google ScholarCross Ref
[63] Ge C., Susilo W., Baek J., Liu Z., Xia J., and Fang L.. 2022. Revocable attribute-based encryption with data integrity in clouds. In IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 19, 5 (2022), 2864--2872. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[64] Ge C., Susilo W., Baek J., Liu Z., Xia J., and Fang L. 2021. A verifiable and fair attribute-based proxy re-encryption scheme for data sharing in clouds. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 19, 5 (2021), 2907–2919.Google ScholarCross Ref
[65] Wells D., Beck N., Kleusberg A., Krakiwsky E. J., Lachapelle G., Langley R. B., … and Delikaraoglou D.. 1987. Guide to GPS positioning. In Canadian GPS Assoc.Google Scholar
[66] Pekonen O.. 2021. Cubed: The Puzzle of Us All by Ernő Rubik.Google Scholar
[67] OpenAI I. A., Andrychowicz M., Chociej M., Litwin M., McGrew B., Petron A., … and Zhang L.. 2019. Solving rubik's cube with a robot hand.Google Scholar
[68] Agostinelli F., McAleer S., Shmakov A., and Baldi P.. 2019. Solving the Rubik's cube with deep reinforcement learning and search. Nature Machine Intelligence 1, 8 (2019), 356–363.Google ScholarCross Ref
[69] Knudsen L. R. and Robshaw M. J.. 2011. Brute force attacks. In The Block Cipher Companion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 95–108.Google Scholar
[70] Tournier Jonathan, Lesueur François, Mouël Frédéric Le, Guyon Laurent, and Ben-Hassine Hicham. 2021. A survey of IoT protocols and their security issues through the lens of a generic IoT stack. Internet of Things 16 (2021), 100264. Google ScholarCross Ref
[71] Abrishamchi Nassiri, Ali Mohammad, Zainal Anazida, Ghaleb Fuad A., Qasem Sultan Noman, and Albarrak Abdullah M.. 2022. Smart home privacy protection methods against a passive wireless snooping side-channel attack. Sensors 22, 21 (2022), 8564. Google ScholarCross Ref
[72] Sheikh Z. A. and Singh Y.. 2021. Lightweight De-authentication DoS attack detection methodology for 802.11 networks using sniffer. In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Computing, Communications, and Cyber-Security. Springer, Singapore, 67–80.Google Scholar
[73] Sain M., Normurodov O., Hong C., and Hui K. L.. 2021. A survey on the security in cyber physical systems with multi-factor authentication. In Proceedings of the 2021 23rd International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT). IEEE, 1–8.Google Scholar
[74] Doshi N.. 2022. Cryptanalysis of authentication protocol for WSN in IoT based electric vehicle environment. Materials Today: Proceedings (2022).Google Scholar
[75] Dai C. and Xu Z.. 2022. A secure three-factor authentication scheme for multi-gateway wireless sensor networks based on elliptic curve cryptography. Ad Hoc Networks (2022), 102768.Google Scholar
[76] Devis Y., Irawan Y., Zoromi F., and Amartha M. R.. 2021. Monitoring system of heart rate, temperature and infusion in patients based on microcontroller (Arduino Uno). In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing 1845, 1 (2021), 012069.Google Scholar
[77] Zhang X., Song M., Xu Y., Dai Z., and Zhang W.. 2021. Intelligent door lock system based on raspberry Pi. In Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. 1–7.Google ScholarDigital Library
[78] Kortli Y., Gabsi S., Voon L. F. L. Y., Jridi M., Merzougui M., and Atri M.. 2022. Deep embedded hybrid CNN-LSTM network for lane detection on NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX. Knowledge-Based Systems (2022), 107941.Google Scholar
[79] Almalki F. A. and Soufiene B. O.. 2021. EPPDA: An efficient and privacy-preserving data aggregation scheme with authentication and authorization for IoT-based healthcare applications. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (2021).Google Scholar
[80] Zuech R., Hancock J., and Khoshgoftaar T. M.. 2021. Detecting SQL injection Web attacks using ensemble learners and data sampling. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR). IEEE, 27–34.Google Scholar
[81] Gowtham M. and Pramod H. B.. 2022. Semantic query-featured ensemble learning model for SQL-injection attack detection in IoT-Ecosystems. In IEEE Transactions on Reliability 71, 2 (2022), 1057--1074. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[82] Shi H., Chen Y., and Hu J. Y.. 2021. Deep learning on information retrieval using agent flow email reply system for IoT enterprise customer service. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (2021), 1–14.Google Scholar
[83] Mothukuri V., Khare P., Parizi R. M., Pouriyeh S., Dehghantanha A., and Srivastava G.. 2022. Federated learning-based anomaly detection for IoT security attacks. In IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9, 4 (2022), 2545--2554. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[84] Medjek F., Tandjaoui D., Djedjig N., and Romdhani I.. 2021. Multicast DIS attack mitigation in RPL-based IoT-LLNs. Journal of Information Security and Applications 61 (2021), 102939.Google ScholarDigital Library
[85] Yang N., Chen K., and Wang M.. 2021. SmartDetour: Defending blackhole and content poisoning attacks in IoT NDN networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 8, 15 (2021), 12119--12136. DOI:Google ScholarCross Ref
[86] Kumar P., Kumar R., Gupta G. P., and Tripathi R.. 2021. A Distributed framework for detecting DDoS attacks in smart contract-based Blockchain-IoT Systems by leveraging Fog computing. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies 32, 6 (2021), e4112.Google Scholar
[87] Alhijawi Bushra, Almajali Sufyan, Elgala Hany, Salameh Haythem Bany, and Ayyash Moussa. 2022. A survey on DoS/DDoS mitigation techniques in SDNs: Classification, comparison, solutions, testing tools and datasets. Computers and Electrical Engineering 99 (2022). Google ScholarDigital Library

Index Terms

A Rubik's Cube Cryptosystem-based Authentication and Session Key Generation Model Driven in Blockchain Environment for IoT Security

Recommendations

Blockchain-Driven Hybrid Model for IoT Authentication
Internet of Things, Smart Spaces, and Next Generation Networks and Systems
Abstract
The Internet of Things has the potential to play a significant part in the ongoing Industrial Revolution. Machines, devices, and sensors are able to connect and communicate with each other via networks. These Internet of Things devices generate an ...
Read More
IoT security: challenges and solutions for mining
ICC '17: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things, Data and Cloud Computing

The Internet of Things (IoT) paradigm with its vast range of heterogeneous connecting technologies heralds a new era for internet research, especially given that this explosion in connectivity for devices or `things' is not without risk. Scholars ...
Read More
Efficient hybrid centralized and blockchain-based authentication architecture for heterogeneous IoT systems
Abstract
With the rapid increase in the number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices in recent years, massive amounts of sensitive IoT data are being generated and transmitted over the Internet. Despite its growing adoption in various fields, IoT ...
Read More

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Published in
ACM Transactions on Internet of Things Volume 4, Issue 2
May 2023
199 pages
EISSN:2577-6207
DOI:10.1145/3586022
Editor:
Gian Pietro Picco
University of Trento, Italy
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
In-Cooperation
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States

Journal Family
ACM Journals for the Design of Smart and Connected Systems
Publication History
- Published: 12 May 2023
- Online AM: 6 March 2023
- Accepted: 17 February 2023
- Revised: 15 December 2022
- Received: 7 February 2022
Published in tiot Volume 4, Issue 2

Permissions
Request permissions about this article.
Request Permissions

Check for updates
Author Tags
Rubik's Cube Cryptosystem
mutual authentication
Internet of Things
secret session keys
session key randomizer
Blockchain
token (zvma)
Cyber-security
IoT security
data privacy
chaotic maps
image encryption-decryption
number theory
RCC-Block-MASSK model
light-weight
Qualifiers
- research-article
Conference
Funding Sources
Other Metrics
View Article Metrics

Article Metrics
- 1
  Total Citations
  View Citations
- 466
  Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)322
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
Other Metrics
View Author Metrics
Cited By
View all

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

View Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format

A Rubik's Cube Cryptosystem-based Authentication and Session Key Generation Model Driven in Blockchain Environment for IoT Security

ACM Transactions on Internet of Things

Abstract

REFERENCES

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Blockchain-Driven Hybrid Model for IoT Authentication

IoT security: challenges and solutions for mining

Efficient hybrid centralized and blockchain-based authentication architecture for heterogeneous IoT systems