skip to main content
10.1145/3587102.3588812acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fostering the Innovative Mindset: Entrepreneurship Clinic Model for Computer Science Students

Published:30 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Graduates distinguish themselves by being creative, innovative, and showing leadership, but such instructional topics are usually formally emphasized in business curricula. Computer Science students could minor in entrepreneurship or other business-related fields in order to foster their innovative mindset and obtain a business acumen that complements the technical expertise they obtain in their majors, but such minors usually require at least five additional courses. We discuss the formal incorporation of entrepreneurship in the computer science curriculum as part of a clinic model that includes real-world experiences, at the expense of two 1-credit hands-on clinics that can be embedded into the number of credits required for the computer science degree.

After experimenting with various models and activities over a period of several years, we present our current iteration that was successfully deployed for the past four years as a course framework that combines both entrepreneurial and technical aspects into a two-semester software engineering course sequence with assigned clinic experience during the junior year. Students learn how to find and evaluate ideas, build rapid prototypes, test hypotheses, use different types of business models and financial analysis, market their software products, and understand how to start a business. Students are able to pitch and refine their ideas with various audiences and compete in entrepreneurship competitions. From dreaming ideas to creating and managing teams, computer science students are guided through the process by faculty, entrepreneurs, and potential investors. We present the steps and activities that complement our framework, with case studies and lesson learned.

References

  1. F. V. Cespedes, T. Aas, A. Hunt, H. Newton-Hill, 2022. Using Simulations to Upskill Employees. Harvard Business Review 2022 Nov.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Sweeney, E. Imaretska, 2015. The Innovative Mindset: 5 Behaviors for Accelerating Breakthroughs. Willey Oct. 2015, ISBN: 978--1--119--16128--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. A. Almulla , 2020. The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. SAGE Open, 10(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. J. McConnell, 1996. Active learning and its use in computer science. ACMSIGCSE Bulletin, vol. 28, no. SI, pp. 52--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. T. Owens, and K. D. Tanner, 2017. Teaching as brain changing: exploring connections between neuroscience and innovative teaching. CBE -- Life Sciences Education, vo. 16, no. 2, p. fe2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth, 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp 8410--8415.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. N. Liao, W. G. Griswold, and L. Porter, 2018. Classroom experience report on jigsaw learning. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2018, pp 302--307, ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Skirpan, J. Cameron, and T. Yeh, 2018. Quantified Self: An Interdisciplinary Immersive Theater Project Supporting a Collaborative Learning Environment for CS Ethics. Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. February 2018, Pages 946--951.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. N. E. Seymour, A. G. Gallagher, S. A Roman, M. K O'Brien, V. K Bansal, D. K Andersen, R. M Satava, 2016. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of Surgery 2002 Oct;236(4):458--63; discussion 463--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. C. Collberg, S. Debray, S. Kobourov, and S. Westbrook, 2005. Increasing Undergraduate Involvement in Computer Science Research. In Proceedings 8th IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Bright and J. R. Philips, 1999. The Harvey Mudd Engineering Clinic Past, Present, Future. Journal for Engineering Education, vol. 88, pp 189--194.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Bakrania and R. Jha, 2020. Upgrading the Capstone Projects: The Engineering Clinic Model. Procedia Computer Science, Special Issue on 9th World Engineering Education Forum, vol. 172, pp 344--349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Richard K. Coll, Karsten Zegwaard (Eds.). 2011. International handbook for cooperative and work-integrated education: International Perspectives of Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd. ed.). World Association for Cooperative Education, ISBN 0615518850, 9780615518855.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mary Moriarty, Susannah Howe, Elena R. Yasinski. 2013. Job Shadowing: Improving Interest and Persistence for Women in Engineering. In Proceedings of the 120th. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE '13). DOI:https://doi.org/10.18260/1--2--19850Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ad. Rusu, R. Elliott, D. Jones, K. McGarry, C. Santiago, H.S. Mohammed, 2005. Pioneering Entrepreneurial Software Engineers. In Proceedings 35th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE '05).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ad. Rusu, R. Webb, D. Shanline, C. Santiago, C. Luna, M. Kulak.. 2005. A Multiple-Projects-Multiple-Winners Approach for Teaching Software Engineering. In Proceedings 9th IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ad. Rusu, Am. Rusu, J. Kay, and H. Zhang, 2007. Pushing Beyond Traditional School and Course Boundaries: High School and University Students Collaborate on an Interdisciplinary Project. In Proceedings 37th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE '07).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ad. Rusu, Am. Rusu, M. Paglione, F. Snyder, and C. Santiago, 2007. Overcoming Limited Resources: An Academia-Government Partnership on Software Engineering and Capstone Projects. In Proceedings 37th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE '07).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Rusu, S. Gowda, 2011. A comparative study of academic partnerships from a student perspective. In Proceedings 41st Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE ?11), pp.S4F-1-S4F-6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ad. Rusu, Am. Rusu, R. Docimo, C. Santiago, and M. Paglione, 2009. Academia- Academia-Industry Collaborations on Software Engineering Projects Using Local- Remote Teams. In Proceedings 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '09), pages 301--305.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ad. Rusu, M. Bealor, H. Lopez, 2014. Interdisciplinary Faculty-Faculty Collaborations for the Development of Learning Technologies. In Proceedings 44th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE '14).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. A. Rusu and J. Lawlor, 2010. Connecting campus and community through web development service-learning projects. In Proceedings 40th Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE ?10), Arlington, VA, USA, pp. F4D-1-F4D-6, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673153.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Am. Rusu, Ad. Rusu, and M. Roer, 2015. Creating Software Engineering Entrepreneurial Awareness through Hands-on Interaction with Real Entrepreneurs. In Proceedings 18th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. F. Fagerholm, A. Hellas, M. Luukkainen, K. Kyllönen, S. Yaman, H. Mäenpää, 2018. Designing and Implementing an Environment for Software Start-up Education: Patterns and Anti-Patterns. Journal of Systems and Software 146. 1--13. 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.060.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. P. Salas, 2017. Teaching Entrepreneurship in Computer Science: Lessons Learned. In Proceedings 47th Annual IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE '17). 10.1109/FIE.2017.8190664.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. K. Buffardi, C. Robb, D. Rahn, 2017. Learning Agile with Tech Startup Software Engineering Projects. In Proceedings 22nd ACM Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '17). 28--33. 10.1145/3059009.3059063.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. Fernandes, P. Afonso, V. Fonte, V. Alves, A. Ribeiro, 2016. Promoting entrepreneurship among informatics engineering students: insights from a case study. European Journal of Engineering Education 1--18. 10.1080/03043797.2016.1197891.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. A. Maurya, 2012. Running Lean: Iterate from Plan A to a Plan That Works (2nd. ed.). The Lean series. Eric Ries, Series Ed. O'Reilly.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. M. Neumeier, 2012. Zag: The Number One Strategy of High-Performance Brands (1st. ed.). New Riders.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. M.E. Porter, 1979. How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review 57, 137--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, D. R. Krathwohl, 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Vol. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fostering the Innovative Mindset: Entrepreneurship Clinic Model for Computer Science Students

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ITiCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1
          June 2023
          694 pages
          ISBN:9798400701382
          DOI:10.1145/3587102

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 June 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

          Upcoming Conference

          ITiCSE 2024
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)48
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader