skip to main content
10.1145/3587103.3594139acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiticseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Design and Implementation of Co-design Pedagogical Scenarios for Learning Computational Thinking

Published:29 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recognizing effective approaches to communicate computational thinking (CT) ideas to K-12 learners is necessary. Co-design approach has been identified as an effective pedagogy for communicating CT ideas. However, there is a dearth of studies on co-design pedagogical scenarios. Hence, this study aimed at developing a CT learning co-design scenario, translate into artifact, and implement with Nigerian secondary school students.

References

  1. Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Adewumi, S. (2019). A systematic review of computational thinking approach for programming education in higher education institutions. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (pp.1--10).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agbo, F. J., Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., & Laine, T. H. (2021). Co-design of mini games for learning computational thinking in an online environment. Education and information technologies, 26(5), 5815--5849.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Agbo, F. J. (2022). Co-designing a smart learning environment to facilitate computational thinking education in the Nigerian context (Doctoral dissertation, Itä-Suomen yliopisto). https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/27287Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). CT in K--12: A review of the state of the field. Educational researcher, 42(1), 38--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hadad, S., Shamir-Inbal, T., Blau, I., & Leykin, E. (2021). Professional development of code and robotics teachers through small private online course (SPOC): Teacher centrality and pedagogical strategies for developing computational thinking of students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4), 763--791.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Maphosa, V., Dube, B., & Jita, T. (2021). Sustainable information and learning access at a rural university in Zimbabwe through a mobile application. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(2), 82--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Naidoo, R. G. (2012). An exploratory survey of design science research amongst South African computing scholars. Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference (pp. 335- 342). South Africa: ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Oyelere, S. (2017). Design and development of a mobile learning system for computer science education in Nigerian higher education context. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Eastern Finland). https://erepo.uef.fi/handle/123456789/18930.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W., & Shechtman, N. (2006). Co-design of innovations with teachers: Definition and dynamics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tang, X., Yin, Y., Lin, Q., Hadad, R., & Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing computational thinking: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 148, 103798.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wang, C., Shen, J., & Chao, J. (2021). Integrating computational thinking in stem education: A literature review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Wing, J. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking-what and why. The Link Magazine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wu, S., Peel, A., Bain, C., Anton, G., Horn, M., & Wilensky, U. (2020, April). Workshops and co-design can help teachers integrate computational thinking into their k-12 stem classes. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design and Implementation of Co-design Pedagogical Scenarios for Learning Computational Thinking

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ITiCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2
        June 2023
        694 pages
        ISBN:9798400701399
        DOI:10.1145/3587103

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 June 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate552of1,613submissions,34%

        Upcoming Conference

        ITiCSE 2024
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)87
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader