skip to main content
10.1145/3587259.3627560acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesk-capConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

NLFOA: Natural Language Focused Ontology Alignment

Published:05 December 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

For Ontology Alignment (OA), the task is to align semantically equivalent concepts and relations from different ontologies. This task plays a crucial role in many downstream tasks and applications in academia and industry. Since manually aligning ontologies is inefficient and costly, numerous approaches exist to do this automatically. However, most approaches are tailored to specific domains, are rule-based systems or based on feature engineering, and require external knowledge. The most recent advances in the field of OA rely on the widely proven effectiveness of pre-trained language models to represent the human-generated language that describes the entities in an ontology. However, these approaches additionally require sophisticated algorithms or Graph Neural Networks to exploit an ontology’s graphical structure to achieve state-of-the-art performance. In this work, we present NLFOA, or Natural Language Focused Ontology Alignment, which purely focuses on the natural language contained in ontologies to process the ontology’s semantics as well as graphical structure. An evaluation of our approach on common OA datasets shows superior results when finetuning with only a small number of training samples. Additionally, it demonstrates strong results in a zero-shot setting which could be employed in an active learning setup to reduce human labor when manually aligning ontologies significantly.

References

  1. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Minneapolis, MN, USA, 4171–4186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sefika Efeoglu. 2023. GraphMatcher: A Graph Representation Learning Approach for Ontology Matching: Results for OAEI 2022. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3324. Hangzhou, China (virtual), 174–180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Vadim Ermolayev and Maxim Davidovsky. 2012. Agent-based Ontology Alignment: Basics, Applications, Theoretical foundations, and Demonstration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics. Craiova, Romania, 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Daniel Faria, Catia Pesquita, Emanuel Santos, Matteo Palmonari, Isabel F Cruz, and Francisco M Couto. 2013. The AgreementMakerLight Ontology Matching system. In OTM Confederated International Conferences ’On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems’. 527–541.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Daniel Faria, Marta Contreiras Silva, Pedro Cotovio, Patrícia Eugénio, and Catia Pesquita. 2022. Matcha and Matcha-DL Results for OAEI 2022. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J Gargantilla and A Gomez-Perez. 2004. OntoWeb: A Survey on Ontology-based Applications. OntoWeb Consortium IST Project IST-2000-29243, Deliverable 1 (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Francis Gosselin and Amal Zouaq. 2023. SEBMatcher Results for OAEI 2022. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3324. Hangzhou, China (virtual), 202–209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Junheng Hao, Chuan Lei, Vasilis Efthymiou, Abdul Quamar, Fatma Özcan, Yizhou Sun, and Wei Wang. 2021. Medto: Medical Data to Ontology Matching using Hybrid Graph Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Washington DC, USA, 2946–2954.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Terry F Hayamizu, Sherri de Coronado, Gilberto Fragoso, Nicholas Sioutos, James A Kadin, and Martin Ringwald. 2012. The Mouse-Human Anatomy Ontology Mapping Project. Database: The Journal of Biological Databases and Curation 2012 (2012), bar066.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Yuan He, Jiaoyan Chen, Denvar Antonyrajah, and Ian Horrocks. 2022. BERTMap: A BERT-based Ontology Alignment System. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36. 5684–5691.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Yuan He, Jiaoyan Chen, Hang Dong, Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz, Ali Hadian, and Ian Horrocks. 2022. Machine Learning-Friendly Biomedical Datasets for Equivalence and Subsumption Ontology Matching. In The Semantic Web – ISWC 2022. Hangzhou, China (virtual), 575–591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sven Hertling and Heiko Paulheim. 2021. ATBox Results for OAEI 2021. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3063. 137–143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sven Hertling, Jan Portisch, and Heiko Paulheim. 2022. KERMIT - A Transformer-Based Approach for Knowledge Graph Matching. CoRR abs/2204.13931 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Vivek Iyer, Arvind Agarwal, and Harshit Kumar. 2021. VeeAlign: Multifaceted Context Representation Using Dual Attention for Ontology Alignment. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, 10780–10792.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz and Bernardo Cuenca Grau. 2011. LogMap: Logic-based and Scalable Ontology Matching. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on The Semantic Web (ISWC) – Volume Part I. Bonn, Germany, 273–288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jeff Johnson, Matthijs Douze, and Hervé Jégou. 2019. Billion-scale similarity search with GPUs. IEEE Transactions on Big Data (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Peter Kardos, Zsolt Szántó, and Richárd Farkas. 2023. WomboCombo Results for OAEI 2022. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3324. Hangzhou, China (virtual), 216–219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Leon Knorr and Jan Portisch. 2022. Fine-TOM Matcher Results for OAEI 2021. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3063. online, 144–151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Prodromos Kolyvakis, Alexandros Kalousis, and Dimitris Kiritsis. 2018. DeepAlignment: Unsupervised Ontology Matching with Refined Word Vectors. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT), Volume 1 (Long Papers). New Orleans, LA, USA, 787–798.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Daniel Kossack, Niklas Borg, Leon Knorr, and Jan Portisch. 2022. TOM Matcher Results for OAEI 2021. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3063. online, 193–198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Weiwei Lin and Reiko Haga. 2021. Matching Cyber Security Ontologies through Genetic Algorithm-Based Ontology Alignment Technique. Security and Communication Networks 2021 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Ikechukwu Nkisi-Orji, Nirmalie Wiratunga, Stewart Massie, Kit-Ying Hui, and Rachel Heaven. 2019. Ontology Alignment based on Word Embedding and Random Forest Classification. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (ECML-PKDD). Dublin, Ireland, 557–572.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mina Abd Nikooie Pour, Alsayed Algergawy, Patrice Buche, Leyla J Castro, Jiaoyan Chen, Hang Dong, Omaima Fallatah, Daniel Faria, Irini Fundulaki, Sven Hertling, Yuan He, Ian Horrocks, Martin Huschka, Liliana Ibanescu, Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz, Naouel Karam, Amir Laadhar, Patrick Lambrix, Huanyu Li, Ying Li, Franck Michel, Engy Nasr, Heiko Paulheim, Catia Pesquita, Tzanina Saveta, Pavel Shvaiko, Cassia Trojahn, Chantelle Verhey, Mingfang Wu, Beyza Yaman, Ondrej Zamazal, and Lu Zhou. 2023. Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2022. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3324. Hangzhou, China (virtual), 84–128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Hong Kong, China, 3973–3983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Pavel Shvaiko and Jérôme Euzenat. 2011. Ontology Matching: state of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 25, 1 (2011), 158–176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Tao Qin, Jianfeng Lu, and Tie-Yan Liu. 2020. MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-Training for Language Understanding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), Vol. 33. online, 16857–16867.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Xiaobin Tang, Jing Zhang, Bo Chen, Yang Yang, Hong Chen, and Cuiping Li. 2020. BERT-INT:A BERT-based Interaction Model For Knowledge Graph Alignment. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Yokohama, Japan, 3174–3180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention Is All You Need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vol. 30. Long Beach, CA, USA, 5998–6008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Javier Vela and Jorge Gracia. 2023. Cross-Lingual Ontology Matching with CIDER-LM: Results for OAEI 2022. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3324. Hangzhou, China (virtual), 158–165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lucy Lu Wang, Chandra Bhagavatula, Mark Neumann, Kyle Lo, Chris Wilhelm, and Waleed Ammar. 2018. Ontology Alignment in the Biomedical Domain Using Entity Definitions and Context. In Proceedings of the BioNLP 2018 Workshop. Melbourne, Australia, 47–55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Zhu Wang. 2023. AMD Results for OAEI 2022. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 3324. Hangzhou, China (virtual), 145–152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jifang Wu, Jianghua Lv, Haoming Guo, and Shilong Ma. 2020. DAEOM: A Deep Attentional Embedding Approach for Biomedical Ontology Matching. Applied Sciences 10, 21 (2020), 7909.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ondej Zamazal and Vojtch Svtek. 2017. The Ten-Year OntoFarm and its Fertilization within the Onto-Sphere. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 43, C (2017), 46–53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. NLFOA: Natural Language Focused Ontology Alignment
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            K-CAP '23: Proceedings of the 12th Knowledge Capture Conference 2023
            December 2023
            270 pages
            ISBN:9798400701412
            DOI:10.1145/3587259
            • Editors:
            • Brent Venable,
            • Daniel Garijo,
            • Brian Jalaian

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 5 December 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate55of198submissions,28%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)71
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format