skip to main content
10.1145/3587421.3595404acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessiggraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
invited-talk

The Efficacy of Discrepancy in Computer Graphics

Published:07 August 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this presentation, we survey modern discrepancy metrics and use them to estimate the quality of point sets produced from a variety of sample generators in two dimensions. Then, we calculate the actual performance of these point sets for integrating a number of signals in the unit square. Finally, we correlate the estimated performance to the observed result to determine which metrics have the greatest utility as predictors of success for computer graphics applications.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

gensub_107_VOD.mp4

mp4

497 MB

References

  1. Abdalla G. M. Ahmed, Till Niese, Hui Huang, and Oliver Deussen. 2017. An Adaptive Point Sampler on a Regular Lattice. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 4, Article 138 (July 2017), 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073588Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Brent Burley. 2020. Practical Hash-based Owen Scrambling. Journal of Computer Graphics Techniques (JCGT) 10, 4 (29 December 2020), 1–20. http://jcgt.org/published/0009/04/01/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Per Christensen, Andrew Kensler, and Charlie Kilpatrick. 2018. Progressive Multi-Jittered Sample Sequences. Computer Graphics Forum 37, 4 (2018), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13472 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.13472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. David Paul Dobkin and Don P. Mitchell. 1993. Random-edge discrepancy of supersampling patterns, In Proceedings of Graphics Interface ’93. Proceedings of Graphics Interface ’93, 62–69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carola Doerr, Michael Gnewuch, and Magnus Wahlström. 2014. Calculation of Discrepancy Measures and Applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 621–678. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04696-9_10Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Peter Hellekalek and Harald Niederreiter. 1998. The Weighted Spectral Test: Diaphony. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 8, 1 (Jan. 1998), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/272991.273008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Fred J. Hickernell. 1998a. A Generalized Discrepancy and Quadrature Error Bound. Math. Comp. 67, 221 (1998), 299–322. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2584985Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fred J. Hickernell. 1998b. Lattice Rules: How Well Do They Measure Up?Springer New York, New York, NY, 109–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1702-2_3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. William J. Morokoff and Russel E. Caflisch. 1994. Quasi-Random Sequences and Their Discrepancies. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 15, 6 (1994), 1251–1279. https://doi.org/10.1137/0915077 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1137/0915077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mayur Patel. 2022. Optimizing Kronecker Sequences for Multidimensional Sampling. Journal of Computer Graphics Techniques (JCGT) 11, 1 (2 March 2022), 55–81. http://jcgt.org/published/0011/01/04/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Peter Shirley. 1991. Discrepancy as a Quality Measure for Sample Distributions. In EG 1991-Technical Papers. Eurographics Association, Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/egtp.19911013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Yong-Dao Zhou, Kai-Tai Fang, and Jian-Hui Ning. 2013. Mixture discrepancy for quasi-random point sets. Journal of Complexity 29, 3 (2013), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2012.11.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The Efficacy of Discrepancy in Computer Graphics

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGGRAPH '23: ACM SIGGRAPH 2023 Talks
            August 2023
            147 pages
            ISBN:9798400701436
            DOI:10.1145/3587421

            Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 August 2023

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • invited-talk
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,822of8,601submissions,21%

            Upcoming Conference

            SIGGRAPH '24
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format