skip to main content
10.1145/3588155.3588160acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Weighted Matrix Factorization with Wilson Lower Bound Score

Published:12 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This report aims to propose an improvement to the recommendation system based on collaborative filtering with implicit feedback. Because existing weighted matrix factorization weights all unknown ratings equally, this does not make much sense in reality. To enhance the precision and dependability of weighted matrix factorization, this report suggests combining weighted matrix factorization and Wilson lower bound scores to dynamically alter the weights of unknown ratings, which is more accurate than setting equal weights for all unknown ratings. Thus, exposure bias can be minimized more effectively.

References

  1. Jannach, D., Lerche, L., Zanker, M. 2018. Recommending based on implicit feedback.In: Brusilovsky, P., He, D. (eds) Social Information Access. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10100. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-90092-6_14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. He, X.; Zhang, H.; Kan, M.-Y.; and Chua, T.-S. 2016. Fast matrix factorization for online recommendation with implicit feedback. In SIGIR, 549–558.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayer, I.; He, X.; Kanagal, B.; and Rendle, S. 2017. A generic coordinate descent framework for learning from implicit feedback. In International Conference on World Wide Web, 1341–1350.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Johnson, C. C. 2014. Logistic matrix factorization for implicit feedback data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rendle, S.; Freudenthaler, C.; Gantner, Z.; and Schmidt-Thieme, L. 2009. Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, 452– 461.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wu, Y.; DuBois, C.; Zheng, A. X.; and Ester, M. 2016. Collaborative denoising  auto-encoders for top-n recommender systems. In International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 153– 162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. He, X.; Liao, L.; Zhang, H.; Nie, L.; Hu, X.; and Chua, T.-S. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, 173–182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu, Y.; Koren, Y.; and Volinsky, C. 2008. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback  datasets. In International Conference on Data Mining, 263–272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim, Y. -D. and Choi, S. 2009. "Weighted nonnegative matrix factorization," 2009  IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 1541-1544, doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2009.4959890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Shao, W., He, L., Yu, P.S. (2015). Multiple Incomplete Views Clustering via Weighted Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with L2,1L2,1 Regularization. In: Appice, A., Rodrigues, P., Santos Costa, V., Soares, C., Gama, J., Jorge, A. (eds) Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. ECML PKDD 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9284. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23528-8_20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Li, H., Diao, X., Cao, J., and Zheng,Q. 2018. "Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Based on All-Weighted Matrix Factorization and Fast Optimization," in IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 25248-25260, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2828401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chen, J., Wang, C., Zhou, S., Shi, Q., Chen, J., Feng, Y., & Chen, C. (2020). Fast Adaptively Weighted Matrix Factorization for Recommendation with Implicit Feedback. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(04), 3470-3477. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i04.5751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kumar, A. (2022). Wilson Lower bound Score and Bayesian Approximation for K star scale rating to Rate products. Retrieved 10 October 2022, from https://medium.com/tech-that-works/wilson-lower-bound-score-and-bayesian-approximation-for-k-star-scale-rating-to-rate-products-c67ec6e30060#:∼:text=Lower% 20bound%20of%20Wilson%20score,and%20the%20use%20this%20score.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. F. Maxwell Harper and Joseph A. Konstan. 2015. The MovieLens Datasets: History and Context. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 5, 4, Article 19 (December 2015), 19 pages. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2827872Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Weighted Matrix Factorization with Wilson Lower Bound Score

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      APIT '23: Proceedings of the 2023 5th Asia Pacific Information Technology Conference
      February 2023
      192 pages
      ISBN:9781450399500
      DOI:10.1145/3588155

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 June 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format