skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Effectiveness Perspectives and a Deep Relevance Model for Spatial Keyword Queries

Published:30 May 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Geo-textual objects with both geographical location and textual description are gaining in prevalence. Over the past decades, substantial research has been conducted on spatial keyword queries, which integrate location into keyword-based querying of geo-textual content. However, existing proposals mostly focus on efficiency for processing spatial keyword queries, and little effort was made to address the effectiveness perspectives.

In this work, using two datasets with ground truth query results, we evaluate the effectiveness of standard spatial keyword queries. Our evaluation results show that the TkQ query that ranks objects by a weighted combination of spatial proximity and text relevance is the most effective. Motivated by the finding, we propose a Deep relevance with Weight learning (DrW) model to further improve the effectiveness of the retrieval ranking. DrW is featured with two novel ideas: First, we propose a neural network architecture to learn the text relevance matching over the local interaction between the query and geo-textual objects. Second, we find that a query-dependent weight to balance text relevance and spatial proximity in ranking can improve effectiveness, and we develop a learning-based method to learn the query-dependent weight. Experimental results reveal that our model outperforms state-of-the-art methods on effectiveness, with improvements up to 32.15%, 32.34%, and 33.00% in terms of NDCG@3, NDCG@5, and MRR.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

Presentation_video_DrW_final_version.mp4

Presentation video

mp4

24.3 MB

References

  1. Ritesh Ahuja, Nikos Armenatzoglou, Dimitris Papadias, and George J Fakas. 2015. Geo-social keyword search. In SSTD. Springer, 431--450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Xin Cao, Gao Cong, and Christian S. Jensen. 2010. Retrieving Top-k Prestige-Based Relevant Spatial Web Objects. In VLDB. 373--384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Xin Cao, Gao Cong, Christian S Jensen, and Beng Chin Ooi. 2011. Collective spatial keyword querying. In SIGMOD. 373--384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhe Cao, Tao Qin, Tie-Yan Liu, Ming-Feng Tsai, and Hang Li. 2007. Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach. In ICML. 129--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariel Cary, Ouri Wolfson, and Naphtali Rishe. 2010. Efficient and Scalable Method for Processing Top-k Spatial Boolean Queries. In SSDBM. 87--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gang Chen, Jingwen Zhao, Yunjun Gao, Lei Chen, and Rui Chen. 2017. Time-Aware Boolean Spatial Keyword Queries. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., Vol. 29, 11 (2017), 2601--2614.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lisi Chen, Gao Cong, Christian S. Jensen, and Dingming Wu. 2013. Spatial Keyword Query Processing: An Experimental Evaluation. In VLDB. 217--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yile Chen, Xiucheng Li, Gao Cong, Cheng Long, Zhifeng Bao, Shang Liu, Wanli Gu, and Fuzheng Zhang. 2021b. Points-of-interest relationship inference with spatial-enriched graph neural networks. In VLDB. 504--512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yen-Yu Chen, Torsten Suel, and Alexander Markowetz. 2006. Efficient query processing in geographic web search engines. In SIGMOD. 277--288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhida Chen, Lisi Chen, Gao Cong, and Christian S. Jensen. 2021a. Location- and keyword-based querying of geo-textual data: a survey. In VLDB. 603--640.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Maria Christoforaki, Jinru He, Constantinos Dimopoulos, Alexander Markowetz, and Torsten Suel. 2011. Text vs. space: efficient geo-search query processing. In CIKM. 423--432.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao Cong, Christian S. Jensen, and Dingming Wu. 2009. Efficient Retrieval of the Top-k Most Relevant Spatial Web Objects. In VLDB. 337--348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ian De Felipe, Vagelis Hristidis, and Naphtali Rishe. 2008. Keyword Search on Spatial Databases. In ICDE. 656--665.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jianfeng Gao, Patrick Pantel, Michael Gamon, Xiaodong He, and Li Deng. 2014. Modeling Interestingness with Deep Neural Networks. In EMNLP. 2--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Richard Gö bel, Andreas Henrich, Raik Niemann, and Daniel Blank. 2009. A hybrid index structure for geo-textual searches. In CIKM. 1625--1628.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiafeng Guo, Yixing Fan, Qingyao Ai, and W. Bruce Croft. 2016. A Deep Relevance Matching Model for Ad-hoc Retrieval. In CIKM. 55--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramaswamy Hariharan, Bijit Hore, Chen Li, and Sharad Mehrotra. 2007. Processing Spatial-Keyword (SK) Queries in Geographic Information Retrieval (GIR) Systems. In SSDBM. 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Baotian Hu, Zhengdong Lu, Hang Li, and Qingcai Chen. 2014. Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Matching Natural Language Sentences. In NeurIPS. 2042--2050.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jizhou Huang, Haifeng Wang, Yibo Sun, Miao Fan, Zhengjie Huang, Chunyuan Yuan, and Yawen Li. 2021. HGAMN: Heterogeneous Graph Attention Matching Network for Multilingual POI Retrieval at Baidu Maps. In SIGKDD. 3032--3040.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Po-Sen Huang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, Alex Acero, and Larry P. Heck. 2013. Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using click through data. In CIKM. 2333--2338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Weihuang Huang, Guoliang Li, Kian-Lee Tan, and Jianhua Feng. 2012. Efficient safe-region construction for moving top-K spatial keyword queries. In CIKM. 932--941.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jinling Jiang, Hua Lu, Bin Yang, and Bin Cui. 2015. Finding top-k local users in geo-tagged social media data. In ICDE. 267--278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Ali Khodaei, Cyrus Shahabi, and Chen Li. 2012. SKIF-P: a point-based indexing and ranking of web documents for spatial-keyword search. Geoinformatica, Vol. 16, 3 (2012), 563--596.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Zhisheng Li, Ken CK Lee, Baihua Zheng, Wang-Chien Lee, Dik Lee, and Xufa Wang. 2010. Ir-tree: An efficient index for geographic document search. TKDE, Vol. 23, 4 (2010), 585--599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Cheng Long, Raymond Chi-Wing Wong, Ke Wang, and Ada Wai-Chee Fu. 2013. Collective spatial keyword queries: a distance owner-driven approach. In SIGMOD. 689--700.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jiaheng Lu, Ying Lu, and Gao Cong. 2011. Reverse spatial and textual k nearest neighbor search. In SIGMOD. 349--360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Ahmed R. Mahmood and Walid G. Aref. 2019. Scalable Processing of Spatial-Keyword Queries.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Paras Mehta, Dimitrios Skoutas, and Agnès Voisard. 2015. Spatio-temporal keyword queries for moving objects. In SIGSPATIAL. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Liang Pang, Yanyan Lan, Jiafeng Guo, Jun Xu, Shengxian Wan, and Xueqi Cheng. 2016. Text Matching as Image Recognition. In AAAI. 2793--2799.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Jay M. Ponte and W. Bruce Croft. 2017. A Language Modeling Approach to Information Retrieval. In SIGIR. 202--208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhihu Qian, Jiajie Xu, Kai Zheng, Pengpeng Zhao, and Xiaofang Zhou. 2018. Semantic-aware top-k spatial keyword queries. World Wide Web, Vol. 21, 3 (2018), 573--594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Stephen E. Robertson and Steve Walker. 1994. Some Simple Effective Approximations to the 2-Poisson Model for Probabilistic Weighted Retrieval. In SIGIR. 232--241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Jo a o B. Rocha-Junior, Orestis Gkorgkas, Simon Jonassen, and Kjetil Nørvåg. 2011. Efficient Processing of Top-k Spatial Keyword Queries. In SSTD. 205--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Yelong Shen, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, and Gré goire Mesnil. 2014. Learning semantic representations using convolutional neural networks for web search. In WWW. 373--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yufei Tao and Cheng Sheng. 2013. Fast nearest neighbor search with keywords. TKDE, Vol. 26, 4 (2013), 878--888.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Subodh Vaid, Christopher B Jones, Hideo Joho, and Mark Sanderson. 2005. Spatio-textual indexing for geographical search on the web. In SSTD. 218--235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is All you Need. In NeurIPS. 5998--6008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Dingming Wu, Man Lung Yiu, Christian S. Jensen, and Gao Cong. 2011. Efficient continuously moving top-k spatial keyword query processing. In ICDE. 541--552.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Xike Xie, Xin Lin, Jianliang Xu, and Christian S. Jensen. 2017. Reverse Keyword-Based Location Search. In ICDE. 375--386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Zixuan Yuan, Hao Liu, Yanchi Liu, Denghui Zhang, Fei Yi, Nengjun Zhu, and Hui Xiong. 2020. Spatio-Temporal Dual Graph Attention Network for Query-POI Matching. In SIGIR. 629--638.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthew D. Zeiler. 2012. ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method. CoRR, Vol. abs/1212.5701 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Chengyuan Zhang, Ying Zhang, Wenjie Zhang, and Xuemin Lin. 2013b. Inverted linear quadtree: Efficient top k spatial keyword search. In ICDE. 901--912.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Dongxiang Zhang, Yeow Meng Chee, Anirban Mondal, Anthony K. H. Tung, and Masaru Kitsuregawa. 2009. Keyword Search in Spatial Databases: Towards Searching by Document. In ICDE. 688--699.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Dongxiang Zhang, Beng Chin Ooi, and Anthony K. H. Tung. 2010. Locating mapped resources in Web 2.0. In ICDE. 521--532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Dongxiang Zhang, Kian-Lee Tan, and Anthony KH Tung. 2013a. Scalable top-k spatial keyword search. In EDBT. 359--370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Ji Zhao, Dan Peng, Chuhan Wu, Huan Chen, Meiyu Yu, Wanji Zheng, Li Ma, Hua Chai, Jieping Ye, and Xiaohu Qie. 2019. Incorporating Semantic Similarity with Geographic Correlation for Query-POI Relevance Learning. In AAAI. 1270--1277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Yinghua Zhou, Xing Xie, Chuang Wang, Yuchang Gong, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2005. Hybrid index structures for location-based web search. In CIKM. 155--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Effectiveness Perspectives and a Deep Relevance Model for Spatial Keyword Queries

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data
          Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data  Volume 1, Issue 1
          PACMMOD
          May 2023
          2807 pages
          EISSN:2836-6573
          DOI:10.1145/3603164
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 May 2023
          Published in pacmmod Volume 1, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader