skip to main content
10.1145/3590003.3590021acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescacmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Estimation of Distribution Algorithm with Discrete Hopfield Neural Network for GRAN3SAT Analysis

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Discrete Hopfield Neural Network introduces a G-Type Random 3 Satisfiability logic structure, which can improve the flexibility of the logic structure and meet the requirements of all combinatorial problems. Usually, Exhaustive Search (ES) is regarded as the basic learning algorithm to search the fitness of neurons. To improve the efficiency of the learning algorithm. In this paper, we introduce the Estimation of Distribution Algorithm (EDA) as a learning algorithm for the model. To study the learning mechanism of EDA to improve search efficiency, this study focuses on the impact of EDA on the model under different proportions of literals and evaluates the performance of the model at different phases through evaluation indicators. Analyze the effect of EDA on the synaptic weights and the global solution. From the discussion, it can be found that compared with ES, EDA has a larger search space at the same efficiency, which makes the probability of obtaining satisfactory weights higher, and the proportion of global solutions obtained is higher. Higher proportions of positive literals help to improve the model performance.

References

  1. Atul Adya,Hopfield, J. J. 1982. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 79(8), 2554-2558. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. McCulloch W S, Pitts W. 1990. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of mathematical biology, 52(1), 99-115.W. A. T. W. Abdullah, International journal of intelligent systems. 7, 513-519 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02459570Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Abdullah, W. A. T. W. 1992. Logic programming on a neural network. International journal of intelligent systems, 7(6), 513-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.4550070604Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mansor M A, Sathasivam S. 2016. Accelerating activation function for 3-satisfiability logic programming. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 8(10), 44. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2016.10.05Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Kasihmuddin M S M, Mansor M A, Sathasivam S. 2018. Discrete Hopfield neural network in restricted maximum k-satisfiability logic programming[J]. Sains Malaysiana, 47(6): 1327-1335. htpe://dx. doi. org/10.17576/jsm-2018-4706-30Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Karim, S. A., Zamri, N. E., Alway, A., Kasihmuddin, M. S. M., Ismail, A. I. M., Mansor, M. A., Hassan, N. F. A. 2021. Random satisfiability: A higher-order logical approach in discrete Hopfield Neural Network. IEEE Access, 9, 50831-50845. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3068998Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Guo, Y., Kasihmuddin, M. S. M., Gao, Y., Mansor, M. A., Wahab, H. A., Zamri, N. E., & Chen, J. 2022. YRAN2SAT: A novel flexible random satisfiability logical rule in discrete hopfield neural network. Advances in Engineering Software, 171, 103169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103169Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Zamri, N. E., Azhar, S. A., Mansor, M. A., Alway, A., & Kasihmuddin, M. S. M. (2022). Weighted Random k Satisfiability for k= 1, 2 (r2SAT) in Discrete Hopfield Neural Network. Applied Soft Computing, 109312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gao, Y., Guo, Y., Romli, N. A., Kasihmuddin, M. S. M., Chen, W., Mansor, M. A., Chen, J. 2022. GRAN3SAT: Creating Flexible Higher-Order Logic Satisfiability in the Discrete Hopfield Neural Network. Mathematics, 10(11), 1899. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10111899Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mühlenbein, H., Paass, G. 1996. From recombination of genes to the estimation of distributions I. Binary parameters. In International conference on parallel problem solving from nature. 178-187. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61723-X_982Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Peralta, J., Gutierrez, G., Sanchis, A. 2010. Time series forecasting by evolving artificial neural networks using genetic algorithms and estimation of distribution algorithms. In The 2010 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596892Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Donate, J. P., Li, X., Sánchez, G. G., de Miguel, A. S. 2013. Time series forecasting by evolving artificial neural networks with genetic algorithms, differential evolution and estimation of distribution algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 22(1), 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-011-0741-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Mühlenbein, H. 1997. The equation for response to selection and its use for prediction. Evolutionary computation, 5(3), 303-346. https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.1997.5.3.303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Estimation of Distribution Algorithm with Discrete Hopfield Neural Network for GRAN3SAT Analysis
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CACML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
          March 2023
          598 pages
          ISBN:9781450399449
          DOI:10.1145/3590003

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 May 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format