skip to main content
10.1145/3590003.3590045acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescacmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Discrimination of seismic and non-seismic signal using SCOUTER

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Abstract— For areas with potential occurrence of blasting events, it is essential to distinguish them from natural earthquakes. An efficient processing method is needed to save manpower, especially under the current large amount of data records by seismic stations. We apply a SCOUTER algorithm to distinguish between the two types of events. The recognition precision of the trained model for natural earthquakes and blasts can reach 95% and 92.8%, respectively, and the recall can reach 93.4% and 94.6%, respectively. The testing results of data with different epicentral distances and SNR show that our method is stable, independent on regional waveform characteristics and insensitive to data of different SNR. The explanations for each classification at the final confidence also give us a profound enlightenment.

References

  1. Allmann, B. P., Shearer, P. M., & Hauksson, E. (2008). Spectral discrimination between quarry blasts and earthquakes in southern California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 98(4), 2073-2079.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Badawy, A., Gamal, M., Farid, W., & Soliman, M. S. (2019). Decontamination of earthquake catalog from quarry blast events in northern Egypt. Journal of Seismology, 23, 1357-1372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Beccar-Varela, Maria P., "Use of wavelets techniques to discriminate between explosions and natural earthquakes." Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 457 (2016): 42-51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, T. J., & Murphy, J. R. (1986). Analysis of seismic discrimination capabilities using regional data from western United States events. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 76(4), 1069-1086.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Gendron, Paul, John Ebel, and Dimitris Manolakis. "Rapid joint detection and classification with wavelet bases via Bayes theorem." Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90.3 (2000): 764-774.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gitterman, Y., & Shapira, A. (1993). Spectral discrimination of underwater explosions. Israel Journal of Earth-Sciences, 42(1), 37-44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hartse, H. E., Taylor, S. R., Phillips, W. S., & Randall, G. E. (1997). A preliminary study of regional seismic discrimination in central Asia with emphasis on western China. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 87(3), 551-568.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 770-778).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Horasan, G., Güney, A. B., Küsmezer, A., Bekler, F., Öğütçü, Z., & Musaoğlu, N. (2009). Contamination of seismicity catalogs by quarry blasts: an example from Istanbul and its vicinity, northwestern Turkey. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 34(1), 90-99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kim, Sangkyeum, Kyunghyun Lee, and Kwanho You. "Seismic discrimination between earthquakes and explosions using support vector machine." Sensors 20.7 (2020): 1879.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kong, Qingkai, "Combining Deep Learning With Physics Based Features in Explosion‐Earthquake Discrimination." Geophysical Research Letters 49.13 (2022): e2022GL098645.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, L., Wang, B., Verma, M., Nakashima, Y., Kawasaki, R., & Nagahara, H. (2021). SCOUTER: Slot attention-based classifier for explainable image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 1046-1055).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Linville, Lisa, Kristine Pankow, and Timothy Draelos. "Deep learning models augment analyst decisions for event discrimination." Geophysical Research Letters 46.7 (2019): 3643-3651.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Locatello, F., Weissenborn, D., Unterthiner, T., Mahendran, A., Heigold, G., Uszkoreit, J. & Kipf, T. (2020). Object-centric learning with slot attention. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 11525-11538.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2017). Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Miao, Fajun, "High‐accuracy discrimination of blasts and earthquakes using neural networks with multiwindow spectral data." Seismological Research Letters 91.3 (2020): 1646-1659.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Orlic, Niksa, and Sven Loncaric. "Earthquake—explosion discrimination using genetic algorithm-based boosting approach." Computers & geosciences 36.2 (2010): 179-185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Perol, Thibaut, Michaël Gharbi, and Marine Denolle. "Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location." Science Advances 4.2 (2018): e1700578.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Saad, Omar M., Ahmed Shalaby, and Mohammed S. Sayed. "Automatic discrimination of earthquakes and quarry blasts using wavelet filter bank and support vector machine." Journal of Seismology 23 (2019): 357-371.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. TIAN, X., WANG, M., ZHANG, X., WANG, X., SHENG, S., & LÜ, J. (2022). Discrimination of earthquake and quarry blast based on multi-input convolutional neural network. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 65(5), 1802-1812.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tibi, R., Koper, K. D., Pankow, K. L., & Young, C. J. (2018). Depth Discrimination Using Rg‐to‐Sg Spectral Amplitude Ratios for Seismic Events in Utah Recorded at Local DistancesDepth Discrimination Using Rg‐to‐Sg Spectral Amplitude Ratios for Seismic Events in Utah. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(3A), 1355-1368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, R., Schmandt, B., & Kiser, E. (2020). Seismic discrimination of controlled explosions and earthquakes near Mount St. Helens using P/S ratios. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(10), e2020JB020338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yılmaz, Ş., Bayrak, Y., & Çınar, H. (2013). Discrimination of earthquakes and quarry blasts in the eastern Black Sea region of Turkey. Journal of seismology, 17, 721-734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Discrimination of seismic and non-seismic signal using SCOUTER
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              CACML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
              March 2023
              598 pages
              ISBN:9781450399449
              DOI:10.1145/3590003

              Copyright © 2023 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 29 May 2023

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format