skip to main content
10.1145/3590003.3590046acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescacmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

ENOSE Performance in Transient Time and Steady State Area of Gas Sensor Response for Ammonia Gas: Comparison and Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposed an electronic nose system that utilized a SnO2 semiconductor sensor array to detect volatile ammonia gas in farmland. All sensors were controlled by the Arduino development board. The system could collect data during both the steady-state and transient phases of sensor operation. The collected data was analyzed using PCA (principal component analysis) and MLP (Multi-layer perceptron) neural networks. The experiment was divided into two parts: The first part analyzed four concentrations of ammonia (100ppm, 200ppm, 400ppm, and Air) using PCA and MLP, which successfully distinguished the concentrations with an identification rate of over 95%. In the second part, four gases (air mixed with ammonia, pure ammonia gas, air mixed with ethanol, and pure ethanol) were analyzed using PCA and MLP, with the electronic nose system successfully distinguishing between the four types of gases. The system could read and process data during the transient phase of the sensor, and the constructed sensor array electronic nose system and acquisition method has significant potential for ammonia detection in agricultural environments.

References

  1. R. B. Swotinsky and K. H. Chase, "Health effects of exposure to ammonia: scant information," Am J Ind Med, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 515-21, 1990, doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700170409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. R. E. de la Hoz, D. P. Schlueter, and W. N. Rom, "Chronic lung disease secondary to ammonia inhalation injury: a report on three cases," Am J Ind Med, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 209-14, Feb 1996, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199602)29:2<209::AID-AJIM12>3.0.CO;2-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. X. Wang , "Ammonia exposure causes lung injuries and disturbs pulmonary circadian clock gene network in a pig study," Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, vol. 205, p. 111050, Dec 1 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111050.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. Cheng, Z. Ye, S. Cheng, and X. Guo, "Agricultural ammonia emissions and its impact on PM(2.5) concentrations in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from 2000 to 2018," Environ Pollut, vol. 291, p. 118162, Dec 15 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. A. Sutton, J. W. Erisman, F. Dentener, and D. Moller, "Ammonia in the environment: from ancient times to the present," Environ Pollut, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 583-604, Dec 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.03.013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. M. McGinn and H. H. Janzen, "Ammonia sources in agriculture and their measurement," Canadian Journal of Soil Science, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 139-148, 1998, doi: 10.4141/s96-059.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Insausti, R. Timmis, R. Kinnersley, and M. C. Rufino, "Advances in sensing ammonia from agricultural sources," Sci Total Environ, vol. 706, p. 135124, Mar 1 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D. Li, X. Xu, Z. Li, T. Wang, and C. Wang, "Detection methods of ammonia nitrogen in water: A review," TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 127, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Hu, L. Zhang, and Y. Lv, "Recent advances in cataluminescence gas sensor: Materials and methodologies," Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 306-324, 2018, doi: 10.1080/05704928.2018.1464932.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. M. B. Pushkarsky, M. E. Webber, and C. K. N. Patel, "Ultra-sensitive ambient ammonia detection using CO2-laser-based photoacoustic spectroscopy," Applied Physics B, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 381-385, 2003, doi: 10.1007/s00340-003-1266-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Y. Zhang and L.-T. Lim, "Colorimetric array indicator for NH3 and CO2 detection," Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 255, pp. 3216-3226, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.09.148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. J. Moshayedi, M. Kukade, and D. C. Gharpure, "Electronic-nose (E-nose) for recognition of Cardamom, Nutmeg and Clove oil odor," 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Solórzano , "Early fire detection based on gas sensor arrays: Multivariate calibration and validation," Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 352, p. 130961, 2022/02/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130961.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. Miquel-Ibarz, J. Burgués, and S. Marco, "Global calibration models for temperature-modulated metal oxide gas sensors: A strategy to reduce calibration costs," Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 350, p. 130769, 2022/01/01/ 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2021.130769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. J. Moshayedi, E. Kazemi, M. Tabatabaei, and L. Liao, "Brief modeling equation for metal-oxide; TGS type gas sensors," Filomat, vol. 34, pp. 4997-5008, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Q. Zheng, D. Zhao, J. Deng, X. Xu, and Z. Ou, "Front-end Electronics Design for Micro-Pattern Gas Detectors Based on VA140," in 2021 5th International Conference on Vision, Image and Signal Processing (ICVISP), 18-20 Dec. 2021 2021, pp. 167-170, doi: 10.1109/ICVISP54630.2021.00038.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. W. Wang , "SnO2 nanoparticles-modified 3D-multilayer MoS2 nanosheets for ammonia gas sensing at room temperature," Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 321, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. Gutierrez-Osuna, A. Gutierrez-Galvez, and N. Powar, "Transient response analysis for temperature-modulated chemoresistors," Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 93, no. 1-3, pp. 57-66, 2003/08/01/ 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0925-4005(03)00248-x.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. J. Moshayedi, A. Toudeshki, and D. C. Gharpure, "Mathematical modeling for SnO2 gas sensor based on second-order response," 2013 IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications, pp. 33-38, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. P. Gherman, Y. Cheng, A. Gomez, and O. Saukh, "Compensating Altered Sensitivity of Duty-Cycled MOX Gas Sensors with Machine Learning," in 2021 18th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON), 6-9 July 2021 2021, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1109/SECON52354.2021.9491586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. J. Moshayedi and D. Gharpure, "Implementing Breath to Improve Response of Gas Sensors for Leak Detection in Plume Tracker Robots," in Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, New Delhi, M. Pant, K. Deep, A. Nagar, and J. C. Bansal, Eds., 2014// 2014: Springer India, pp. 337-348.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. F. Kherif and A. Latypova, "Chapter 12 - Principal component analysis," in Machine Learning, A. Mechelli and S. Vieira Eds.: Academic Press, 2020, pp. 209-225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. ENOSE Performance in Transient Time and Steady State Area of Gas Sensor Response for Ammonia Gas: Comparison and Study
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            CACML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
            March 2023
            598 pages
            ISBN:9781450399449
            DOI:10.1145/3590003

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 29 May 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format