skip to main content
10.1145/3590003.3590048acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescacmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A hybrid Aquila Optimizer sine cosine Algorithm for Numerical Optimization

Published:29 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

To address the shortcomings of the Aquila optimizer algorithm (AO), this paper proposes a novel hybrid Aquila Optimizer sine cosine Algorithm(AO-SCA). Firstly, Singer chaotic mapping is used for initialization, so that the initial solution position distribution was more homogeneous, and increased the richness of the population. Secondly, in the exploration phase of AO, the concept of sine and cosine algorithm is integrated and the nonlinear sine learning factor is introduced to balance the local and global digging ability and accelerate the convergence speed. Finally, through the numerical experiment simulation of 8 benchmark functions, the results show that the optimization ability and convergence speed of the proposed algorithm is better.

References

  1. Ralf Salomon. 1996. Re-evaluating genetic algorithm performance under coordinate rotation of benchmark functions. A survey of some theoretical and practical aspects of genetic algorithms. BioSystems 39, 3 (1996), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0303-2647(96)01621-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kenneth V Price. 1996. Differential evolution: a fast and simple numerical optimizer. In Proceedings of North American fuzzy information processing. IEEE, 524–527. https://doi.org/10.1109/NAFIPS.1996.534790Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. James Kennedy and Russell Eberhart. 1995. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN’95-international conference on neural networks, Vol. 4. IEEE, 1942–1948. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ying Tan and Yuanchun Zhu. 2010. Fireworks algorithm for optimization. In International conference in swarm intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg, 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13495-1_44Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ali Asghar Heidari, Seyedali Mirjalili, Hossam Faris, Ibrahim Aljarah, Majdi Mafarja, and Huiling Chen. 2019. Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future generation computer systems 97 (2019), 849–872.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Seyedali Mirjalili and Andrew Lewis. 2016. The whale optimization algorithm. Advances in engineering software 95 (2016), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Seyedali Mirjalili, Seyed Mohammad Mirjalili, and Andrew Lewis. 2014. Grey wolf optimizer. Advances in engineering software 69 (2014), 46–61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ali Sadollah, Hadi Eskandar, Ho Min Lee, Joong Hoon Kim, 2016. Water cycle algorithm: a detailed standard code. SoftwareX 5 (2016), 37–43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Seyedali Mirjalili, Amir H Gandomi, Seyedeh Zahra Mirjalili, Shahrzad Saremi, Hossam Faris, and Seyed Mohammad Mirjalili. 2017. Salp Swarm Algorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Advances in engineering software 114 (2017), 163–191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhibin Nie, Xiaobing Yang, Shihong Gao, Yan Zheng, Jianhui Wang, and Zhanshan Wang. 2016. Research on autonomous moving robot path planning based on improved particle swarm optimization. In 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). IEEE, 2532–2536. https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2016.7744104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Md Anisul Islam, Yuvraj Gajpal, and Tarek Y ElMekkawy. 2021. Hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving the clustered vehicle routing problem. Applied Soft Computing 110 (2021), 107655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Laith Abualigah, Dalia Yousri, Mohamed Abd Elaziz, Ahmed A Ewees, Mohammed AA Al-Qaness, and Amir H Gandomi. 2021. Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering 157 (2021), 107250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Yu-Jun Zhang, Yu-Xin Yan, Juan Zhao, and Zheng-Ming Gao. 2022. AOAAO: The hybrid algorithm of arithmetic optimization algorithm with aquila optimizer. IEEE Access 10 (2022), 10907–10933. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3144431Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Yujun Zhang, Yuxin Yan, Juan Zhao, and Zhengming Gao. 2021. Chaotic map enabled algorithm hybridizing Hunger Games Search algorithm with Aquila Optimizer. In ICMLCA 2021; 2nd International Conference on Machine Learning and Computer Application. VDE, 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Seyedali Mirjalili. 2016. SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowledge-based systems 96 (2016), 120–133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wenbo Zhang, Xiaoteng Yang, Kaiguang Wang, 2022. An Improved Gray Wolf Optimization Algorithm Based on Levy Flight and Adaptive Strategies. In 2022 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA). IEEE, 448–453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A hybrid Aquila Optimizer sine cosine Algorithm for Numerical Optimization

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CACML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
        March 2023
        598 pages
        ISBN:9781450399449
        DOI:10.1145/3590003

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 May 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format