skip to main content
10.1145/3590003.3590050acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescacmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Performance Evaluation of an Extradosed Cable-Stayed Bridge with Corrugated Web based on Machine Learning Algorithms

Published:29 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Corrugated steel web is suitable for large-span extradosed cable-stayed bridge's design scheme. Live Load Structural Index (LLSI) is applied to evaluate the performance of the bridge with corrugated steel web. Parametric numeric models were built and investigated to explore the web height and weight's effect on the structural performance of an extradosed cable-stayed bridge. Machine learning model involving Particle Swarm Optimization BP neural network has been constructed to predict the correlation and validate the relationship between the structural variable and live load structural index.

References

  1. FUJINO, Y. and KAWAI, Y., 2016. Technical developments in structural engineering with emphasis on steel bridges in Japan. Journal of JSCE, 4(1), pp.211-226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang, L., Qiu, G. and Chen, Z., 2021. Structural health monitoring methods of cables in cable-stayed bridge: A review. Measurement, 168, p.108343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Xiong Z., Hou X., Zhu H., Liu Y., Meng Y., Structural Performance and Cost Analysis of Multi-span Extradosed Cable-Stayed Bridge. IABSE Congress Nanjing 2022. 2022, 387-395, https://doi.org/10.2749/nanjing.2022.0387Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Wang, S., Liu, Y., He, J., Xin, H. and Yao, H., 2019. Experimental study on cyclic behavior of composite beam with corrugated steel web considering different shear-span ratio. Engineering Structures, 180, pp.669-684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Orcesi, A., Cremona, C. and Ta, B., 2018. Optimization of design and life-cycle management for steel–concrete composite bridges. Structural Engineering International, 28(2), pp.185-195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Soliman, M. and Frangopol, D.M., 2015. Life-cycle cost evaluation of conventional and corrosion-resistant steel for bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 20(1), p.06014005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Xiong, Z., Li, J., Wang, S., Liu, Y. and Xin, H., 2018, February. Concrete filled tubular arch modified-VFT bridge and its LLSI analysis. In 2017 3rd International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials (IFEESM 2017) (pp. 1379-1382). Atlantis Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J. Wang, X. Xie, X. Cheng and Y. Wang, 2022. Improved density peaking algorithm for community detection based on graph representation learning, Computer Systems Science and Engineering, vol. 43, no.3, pp. 997–1008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ullah, F., Ullah S., Naeem M.R., Mostarda L., Rho S., and Cheng X., 2022. Cyber-Threat Detection System Using a Hybrid Approach of Transfer Learning and Multi-Model Image Representation. Sensors 22, no. 15, p.5883.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. L. Yin, J. Feng, H. Xun, Z. Sun and X. Cheng, ,1 July-Sept. 2021. A Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for Multiparty Data Sharing in Social IoTs, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2706-2718.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Raheja, S., Kasturia, S., Cheng, X., & Kumar, M. 2021. Machine learning-based diffusion model for prediction of coronavirus-19 outbreak. Neural computing & applications, pp. 1–20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yue, Z.X., Ding, Y.L. and Zhao, H.W., 2021. Deep learning-based minute-scale digital prediction model of temperature-induced deflection of a cable-stayed bridge: case study. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 26(6), p.05021004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Martins, A.M., Simões, L.M. and Negrão, J.H., 2020. Optimization of cable-stayed bridges: A literature survey. Advances in Engineering Software, 149, p.102829.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hou, R. and Xia, Y., 2021. Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 491, p.115741.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Najafzadeh, M., Barani, G.A. and Hessami-Kermani, M.R., 2015. Evaluation of GMDH networks for prediction of local scour depth at bridge abutments in coarse sediments with thinly armored beds. Ocean Engineering, 104, pp.387-396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Xiong, Z., Li, J., Zhu, H., Liu, X. and Liang, Z., 2022. Ultimate Bending Strength Evaluation of MVFT Composite Girder by using Finite Element Method and Machine Learning Regressors. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Cai, B., Lin, X., Fu, F. and Wang, L., 2022, October. Postfire residual capacity of steel fiber reinforced volcanic scoria concrete using PSO-BPNN machine learning. In Structures (Vol. 44, pp. 236-247). Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang, Y. and Zhao, Y., 2022. Predicting bedrock depth under asphalt pavement through a data-driven method based on particle swarm optimization-back propagation neural network. Construction and Building Materials, 354, p.129165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Performance Evaluation of an Extradosed Cable-Stayed Bridge with Corrugated Web based on Machine Learning Algorithms
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              CACML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
              March 2023
              598 pages
              ISBN:9781450399449
              DOI:10.1145/3590003

              Copyright © 2023 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 29 May 2023

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format