skip to main content
10.1145/3590003.3590083acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescacmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparison of regional monitoring methods for grassland degradation based on remote sensing images

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

As an integral part of the ecosystem, grassland plays an important role in protecting water and soil, preventing wind and fixing sand and protecting biodiversity. However, some grasslands are degraded at this stage, so a grassland monitoring method is urgently needed to prevent desertification from spreading. With the rapid rise of deep learning, it is more and more popular to apply artificial intelligence methods to grassland degradation monitoring. This paper systematically and comprehensively analyzes that almost all semantic segmentation methods have been applied to relevant research on grassland degradation areas since semantic segmentation methods were applied to grassland monitoring. Then, according to the different algorithm structures of grassland extraction methods, the principles of representative algorithms are introduced in turn. Then we made a statistical analysis of the publication status, research space distribution and the number of citations of papers in this field. Finally, the analysis results are discussed, and the possible research hotspots in the future are discussed.

References

  1. SU J, ZHU X, LI S, AI meets UAVs: a survey on AI empowered UAV perception systems for precision agriculture [J]. 2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. VASWANI A, SHAZEER N, PARMAR N, Attention is all you need [J]. 2017, 30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. WANG Q, MA Y, ZHAO K, A comprehensive survey of loss functions in machine learning [J]. 2020: 1-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. WOLF T, DEBUT L, SANH V, Transformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing; proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, F, 2019 [C].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. WOO S, PARK J, LEE J-Y, Cbam: Convolutional block attention module; proceedings of the Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), F, 2018 [C].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. XU C, YANG J, LAI H, UP-CNN: Un-pooling augmented convolutional neural network [J]. 2019, 119: 34-40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. XU K, LI C, TIAN Y, Representation learning on graphs with jumping knowledge networks; proceedings of the International conference on machine learning, F, 2018 [C]. PMLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. YAN X, JIANG Y, CHEN S, Automatic Grassland Degradation Estimation Using Deep Learning; proceedings of the IJCAI, F, 2019 [C].Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. YANG B, WANG S, LI S, Research and application of UAV-based hyperspectral remote sensing for smart city construction [J]. 2022, 2: 255-66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. YE M, JI L, TIANYE L, A Lightweight Model of VGG-U-Net for Remote Sensing Image Classification [J]. 2022, 73(3): 6195-205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. YU X, GAODI X, LIN Z J J O R, Framework Design of Eco-Technology Evaluation Platform and Integration System [J]. 2017, 8: 325 - 31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. YUAN L, CHEN Y, WANG T, Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNet [J]. 2021: 538-47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. ZEILER M D, FERGUS R. Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks; proceedings of the Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part I 13, F, 2014 [C]. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. ZHANG C, YUE P, TAPETE D, A multi-level context-guided classification method with object-based convolutional neural network for land cover classification using very high resolution remote sensing images [J]. 2020, 88: 102086.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. ZOU R, SONG C, ZHANG Z. The devil is in the details: Window-based attention for image compression; proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, F, 2022 [C].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 石纯一, 黄昌宁. 人工智能原理 [M]. 清华大学出版社有限公司, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of regional monitoring methods for grassland degradation based on remote sensing images
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              CACML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
              March 2023
              598 pages
              ISBN:9781450399449
              DOI:10.1145/3590003

              Copyright © 2023 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 29 May 2023

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format .

            View HTML Format