skip to main content
10.1145/3590003.3590087acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescacmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Unmanned Lane Detection Algorithm Using Deep Learning and Ordered Test Sets Strategy

Published:29 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The traditional method of automatic lane detection is mostly based on Hough detection. However, this category of methods has low robustness and is vulnerable to interference. In order to improve the accuracy of lane detection, the presented paper compares and analyzes the end-to-end lane line detection network based on deep learning, including Unet-base and Deeplabv3+, in view of gradient explosion and slow running speed during model training, solutions are also given. Ordered test sets are used to speed up the training processing and validate the deep learning algorithm, in the case of different image resolutions, uses Unet-base and Deeplabv3+ to perform experiments respectively. Experiments show that under the same resolution, the Unet-base model with FCN network structure incorporating a better training strategy outperforms the Deeplabv3+ algorithm model that uses a classical ASSP module to solve the downsampling layer problem in terms of model generalization capability. And the MIOU of improved Unet-base is higher than Deeplabv3+. Therefore, compared to DeepLabv3+, the improved Unet-base model is more generalized.

References

  1. TANG Zhiwei. Survey on Vision-based Autonomous Vehicles [J]. Manufacturing Automation, 2016, 38(8): 134-136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wu Lingling, Lin Zhixian, Guo Tailiang. Hough Transform lane Detection Based on Superposition Constraint [J]. Cable TV Technology,2019,2019(3):44-49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. SHI L J, YU Su. Lane detection method based on Hough transform under multiple constraints [J]. Computer Measurement and Control,2018,26(9):9-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation[C]. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, USA, 2014: 580-587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Redmon J, Divvala S, Girshick R, You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-time Object Detection[C]. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, 2016: 779-788. SSSGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Qin Z, Wang H, Li X. Ultrafast structure-aware deep lane detection[C]//European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, Cham, 2020: 276-291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Neven D, De Brabandere B, Georgoulis S, Towards end-to-end lane detection: an instance segmentation approach[C]//2018 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV). IEEE, 2018: 286-291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Li Yadi, Huang Haibo, Li Xiangpeng . Night lane detection Based on Canny operator and Hough Transform [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2016,16 (31): 234-237,242Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang Xin, Liu Yuchao, Hai Dan. Lane detection based on Double ROI and variable interval scanning [J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2017, 3(2) :154-159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhao, D., Chen, J. (2019). Graph-FCN for Image Semantic Segmentation. In: Lu, H., Tang, H., Wang, Z. (eds) Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2019. ISNN 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11554. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22796-8_11Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Biswas Sanad,Chambers Destini,Hairston W David,Bhattacharya Sylvia. Head pose classification for passenger with CNN[J]. Transportation Engineering,2023,11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kamal Shoaib,Shende Vaishali Gajendra,Swaroopa Korla,Bindhu Madhavi P.,Akram Patan Saleem,Pant Kumud,Patil Shantala Devi,Sahile Kibebe. FCN Network-Based Weed and Crop Segmentation for IoT-Aided Agriculture Applications[J]. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing,2022,2022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu J, Wang Z, Cheng K. An improved algorithm for semantic segmentation of remote sensing images based on DeepLabv3+[C]//Proceedings of the 5th international conference on communication and information processing. 2019: 124-128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Li Meimei, Hu Chunhai, Long Ping, Liu Shaonan. Lane Detection Algorithm Based on MultiRes+UNet Network [J]. Journal of Electronic Measurement and Instrument,2020,34(9):1-6 [10] KIM J, LEE M.Robust lane detection based onconvolutional neural network and random sampleconsensus [C]. ICONIP, 2014:454-461.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Unmanned Lane Detection Algorithm Using Deep Learning and Ordered Test Sets Strategy
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            CACML '23: Proceedings of the 2023 2nd Asia Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Machine Learning
            March 2023
            598 pages
            ISBN:9781450399449
            DOI:10.1145/3590003

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 29 May 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            CACML '23 Paper Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate93of241submissions,39%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)22
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format