research-article

Open access

The Prompt Artists

Authors:

Stefania Druga,

Alexander J. Fiannaca,

Chinmay Kulkarni,

Michael TerryAuthors Info & Claims

C&C '23: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition

Pages 75 - 87

https://doi.org/10.1145/3591196.3593515

Published: 19 June 2023 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

This paper examines the art practices, artwork, and motivations of prolific users of the latest generation of text-to-image models. Through interviews, observations, and a user survey, we present a sampling of the artistic styles and describe the developed community of practice around generative AI. We find that: 1) artists hold the text prompt and the resulting image can be considered collectively as a form of artistic expression (prompts as art), and 2) prompt templates (prompts with “slots” for others to fill in with their own words) are developed to create generative art styles. We discover that the value placed by this community on unique outputs leads to artists seeking specialized vocabulary to produce distinctive art pieces (e.g., by reading architectural blogs to find phrases to describe images). We also find that some artists use “glitches” in the model that can be turned into artistic styles of their own right. From these findings, we outline specific implications for design regarding future prompting and image editing options.

References

[1]

[n. d.]. AICAN. https://www.aican.io/. (Accessed on 08/31/2022).

[2]

[n. d.]. Imagen: Text-to-Image Diffusion Models. https://imagen.research.google/. (Accessed on 08/31/2022).

[3]

[n. d.]. Midjourney. https://www.midjourney.com/home/. (Accessed on 09/01/2022).

[4]

[n. d.]. Parti: Pathways Autoregressive Text-to-Image Model. https://parti.research.google/. (Accessed on 08/31/2022).

[5]

[n. d.]. Stable Diffusion launch announcement — Stability.Ai. https://stability.ai/blog/stable-diffusion-announcement. (Accessed on 08/31/2022).

[6]

Blaise Agüera y Arcas. 2017. Art in the Age of Machine Intelligence. Arts 6, 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/arts6040018

[7]

David L Altheide and Christopher J Schneider. 2012. Qualitative media analysis. Vol. 38. Sage publications.

[8]

Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.

[9]

Andrew Brock, Jeff Donahue, and Karen Simonyan. 2018. Large Scale GAN Training for High Fidelity Natural Image Synthesis. CoRR abs/1809.11096 (2018). arXiv:1809.11096http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.11096

[10]

Kieran Browne. 2022. Who (or What) Is an AI Artist?Leonardo 55, 2 (04 2022), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02092 arXiv:https://direct.mit.edu/leon/article-pdf/55/2/130/2004755/leon_a_02092.pdf

[11]

Daniel Buschek, Lukas Mecke, Florian Lehmann, and Hai Dang. 2021. Nine Potential Pitfalls when Designing Human-AI Co-Creative Systems. Workshops at the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) (2021).

[12]

Eva Cetinic and James She. 2022. Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlook. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 18, 2, Article 66 (Feb 2022), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799

Digital Library

[13]

Eugene Ch’ng. 2019. Art by Computing Machinery: Is Machine Art Acceptable in the Artworld?ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 15, 2s, Article 59 (Jul 2019), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326338

Digital Library

[14]

Christie’s. 2018. The first piece of AI-generated art to come to auction | Christie’s. https://www.christies.com/features/a-collaboration-between-two-artists-one-human-one-a-machine-9332-1.aspx. (Accessed on 09/06/2022).

[15]

John Joon Young Chung, Minsuk Chang, and Eytan Adar. 2021. Gestural Inputs as Control Interaction for Generative Human-AI Co-Creation. Workshops at the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) (2021).

[16]

John Joon Young Chung, Shiqing He, and Eytan Adar. 2021. The Intersection of Users, Roles, Interactions, and Technologies in Creativity Support Tools. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1817–1833. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462050

Digital Library

[17]

Nicholas Davis, Chih-PIn Hsiao, Kunwar Yashraj Singh, Lisa Li, Sanat Moningi, and Brian Magerko. 2015. Drawing Apprentice: An Enactive Co-Creative Agent for Artistic Collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (Glasgow, United Kingdom) (C&C ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757226.2764555

Digital Library

[18]

Nicholas Davis, Chih-PIn Hsiao, Kunwar Yashraj Singh, Lisa Li, and Brian Magerko. 2016. Empirically Studying Participatory Sense-Making in Abstract Drawing with a Co-Creative Cognitive Agent. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Sonoma, California, USA) (IUI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 196–207. https://doi.org/10.1145/2856767.2856795

Digital Library

[19]

Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 4171–4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423

[20]

Prafulla Dhariwal and Alexander Nichol. 2021. Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesis. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P.S. Liang, and J. Wortman Vaughan (Eds.). Vol. 34. Curran Associates, Inc., 8780–8794. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/file/49ad23d1ec9fa4bd8d77d02681df5cfa-Paper.pdf

[21]

Ahmed Elgammal, Bingchen Liu, Mohamed Elhoseiny, and Marian Mazzone. 2017. CAN: Creative Adversarial Networks, Generating "Art" by Learning About Styles and Deviating from Style Norms. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1706.07068

[22]

Jonas Frich, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Christian Remy, Michael Mose Biskjaer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2019. Mapping the Landscape of Creativity Support Tools in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300619

Digital Library

[23]

Leon A. Gatys, Alexander S. Ecker, and Matthias Bethge. 2015. A Neural Algorithm of Artistic Style. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1508.06576

[24]

Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2020. Generative Adversarial Networks. Commun. ACM 63, 11 (Oct 2020), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422622

Digital Library

[25]

Imke Grabe, Miguel González-Duque, Sebastian Risi, and Jichen Zhu. 2022. Towards a Framework for Human-AI Interaction Patterns in Co-Creative GAN Applications. Workshops at the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) (2022).

[26]

Dejan Grba. 2019. Forensics of a molten crystal: challenges of archiving and representing contemporary generative art. ISSUE Annual Art Journal: Erase 8, 3-15 (2019), 5.

[27]

Dejan Grba. 2021. Brittle Opacity: Ambiguities of the Creative AI. In Proceedings of the xCoAx, 9th Conference on Computation, Communication, Aesthetics & X Proceedings, xCoAx, Graz, Austria. 12–16.

[28]

Dejan Grba. 2022. Deep Else: A Critical Framework for AI Art. Digital 2, 1 (2022), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital2010001

[29]

Aaron Hertzmann. 2018. Can Computers Create Art?Arts 7, 2 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7020018

[30]

Aaron Hertzmann. 2020. Computers Do Not Make Art, People Do. Commun. ACM 63, 5 (Apr 2020), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3347092

Digital Library

[31]

Jonathan Ho, Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, David J Fleet, Mohammad Norouzi, and Tim Salimans. 2022. Cascaded Diffusion Models for High Fidelity Image Generation.J. Mach. Learn. Res. 23 (2022), 47–1.

[32]

Rania Hodhod and Brian Magerko. 2016. Closing the Cognitive Gap between Humans and Interactive Narrative Agents Using Shared Mental Models. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Sonoma, California, USA) (IUI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/2856767.2856774

Digital Library

[33]

Cheng-Zhi Anna Huang, Hendrik Vincent Koops, Ed Newton-Rex, Monica Dinculescu, and Carrie J. Cai. 2020. AI Song Contest: Human-AI Co-Creation in Songwriting. (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2010.05388

[34]

Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang. 2022. Too Late to Be Creative? AI-Empowered Tools in Creative Processes. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 38, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503549

Digital Library

[35]

Youngseung Jeon, Seungwan Jin, Patrick C. Shih, and Kyungsik Han. 2021. FashionQ: An AI-Driven Creativity Support Tool for Facilitating Ideation in Fashion Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 576, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445093

Digital Library

[36]

Yongcheng Jing, Yezhou Yang, Zunlei Feng, Jingwen Ye, Yizhou Yu, and Mingli Song. 2020. Neural Style Transfer: A Review. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 11 (2020), 3365–3385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2921336

[37]

Pegah Karimi, Nicholas Davis, Mary Lou Maher, Kazjon Grace, and Lina Lee. 2019. Relating Cognitive Models of Design Creativity to the Similarity of Sketches Generated by an AI Partner. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition (San Diego, CA, USA) (C&C ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325480.3325488

Digital Library

[38]

Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. 2019. A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[39]

Ryan Louie, Andy Coenen, Cheng Zhi Huang, Michael Terry, and Carrie J. Cai. 2020. Novice-AI Music Co-Creation via AI-Steering Tools for Deep Generative Models. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376739

Digital Library

[40]

Elman Mansimov, Emilio Parisotto, Jimmy Lei Ba, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2015. Generating Images from Captions with Attention. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1511.02793

[41]

Marian Mazzone and Ahmed Elgammal. 2019. Art, Creativity, and the Potential of Artificial Intelligence. Arts 8, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026

[42]

Jon McCormack, Toby Gifford, Patrick Hutchings, Maria Teresa Llano Rodriguez, Matthew Yee-King, and Mark d’Inverno. 2019. In a Silent Way: Communication Between AI and Improvising Musicians Beyond Sound. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300268

Digital Library

[43]

Matt McFarland. 2016. Google’s psychedelic ‘paint brush’ raises the oldest question in art - The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/innovations/wp/2016/03/10/googles-psychedelic-paint-brush-raises-the-oldest-question-in-art/. (Accessed on 09/14/2022).

[44]

Matthew B Miles and A Michael Huberman. 1984. Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational researcher 13, 5 (1984), 20–30.

[45]

Alexander Mordvintsev, Christopher Olah, and Mike Tyka. 2015. Inceptionism: Going Deeper into Neural Networks. https://research.googleblog.com/2015/06/inceptionism-going-deeper-into-neural.html

[46]

Michael Muller, Justin D Weisz, and Werner Geyer. 2020. Mixed Initiative Generative AI Interfaces: An Analytic Framework for Generative AI Applications. In Proceedings of the Workshop The Future of Co-Creative Systems-A Workshop on Human-Computer Co-Creativity of the 11th International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC 2020).

[47]

Alex Nichol, Prafulla Dhariwal, Aditya Ramesh, Pranav Shyam, Pamela Mishkin, Bob McGrew, Ilya Sutskever, and Mark Chen. 2021. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741 (2021).

[48]

Changhoon Oh, Jungwoo Song, Jinhan Choi, Seonghyeon Kim, Sungwoo Lee, and Bongwon Suh. 2018. I Lead, You Help but Only with Enough Details: Understanding User Experience of Co-Creation with Artificial Intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174223

Digital Library

[49]

OpenAI. [n. d.]. DALL·E 2. https://openai.com/dall-e-2/. (Accessed on 08/31/2022).

[50]

OpenAI. [n. d.]. DALL·E: Creating Images from Text. https://openai.com/blog/dall-e/. (Accessed on 08/31/2022).

[51]

Allison Perrone and Justin Edwards. 2019. Chatbots as Unwitting Actors. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Dublin, Ireland) (CUI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342799

Digital Library

[52]

Brian Quanz, Wei Sun, Ajay Deshpande, Dhruv Shah, and Jae-eun Park. 2020. Machine learning based co-creative design framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08791 (2020).

[53]

Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, Peter J Liu, 2020. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer.J. Mach. Learn. Res. 21, 140 (2020), 1–67.

[54]

Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen. 2022. Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2204.06125

[55]

Aditya Ramesh, Mikhail Pavlov, Gabriel Goh, Scott Gray, Chelsea Voss, Alec Radford, Mark Chen, and Ilya Sutskever. 2021. Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generation. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning(Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 139), Marina Meila and Tong Zhang (Eds.). PMLR, 8821–8831. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/ramesh21a.html

[56]

Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. 2022. High-Resolution Image Synthesis With Latent Diffusion Models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 10684–10695.

[57]

Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily Denton, Seyed Kamyar Seyed Ghasemipour, Burcu Karagol Ayan, S. Sara Mahdavi, Rapha Gontijo Lopes, Tim Salimans, Jonathan Ho, David J Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi. 2022. Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2205.11487

[58]

Othman Sbai, Mohamed Elhoseiny, Antoine Bordes, Yann LeCun, and Camille Couprie. 2018. DesIGN: Design Inspiration from Generative Networks. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops.

[59]

Yang Shi, Nan Cao, Xiaojuan Ma, Siji Chen, and Pei Liu. 2020. EmoG: Supporting the Sketching of Emotional Expressions for Storyboarding. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376520

Digital Library

[60]

Angie Spoto and Natalia Oleynik. [n. d.]. Library of Mixed-Initiative Creative Interfaces. http://mici.codingconduct.cc/aboutmicis/. (Accessed on 08/31/2022).

[61]

Georgios N Yannakakis, Antonios Liapis, and Constantine Alexopoulos. 2014. Mixed-initiative co-creativity. (2014).

[62]

Jiahui Yu, Yuanzhong Xu, Jing Yu Koh, Thang Luong, Gunjan Baid, Zirui Wang, Vijay Vasudevan, Alexander Ku, Yinfei Yang, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Ben Hutchinson, Wei Han, Zarana Parekh, Xin Li, Han Zhang, Jason Baldridge, and Yonghui Wu. 2022. Scaling Autoregressive Models for Content-Rich Text-to-Image Generation. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2206.10789

[63]

Nanxuan Zhao, Nam Wook Kim, Laura Mariah Herman, Hanspeter Pfister, Rynson W.H. Lau, Jose Echevarria, and Zoya Bylinskii. 2020. ICONATE: Automatic Compound Icon Generation and Ideation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376618

Digital Library

[64]

Jun-Yan Zhu, Taesung Park, Phillip Isola, and Alexei A. Efros. 2017. Unpaired Image-To-Image Translation Using Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

Cited By

Arsalan HHeesom DMoore N(2025)From Heritage Building Information Modelling Towards an ‘Echo-Based’ Heritage Digital TwinHeritage10.3390/heritage80100338:1(33)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8010033
Meira-Rodríguez P(2025)Creación de ambientes para niveles de videojuegos utilizando Stable DiffusionOptimizing video game level atmosphere with Stable Diffusion-assisted set dressingEuropean Public & Social Innovation Review10.31637/epsir-2025-135410(1-18)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1354
Inie NStray JDerczynski L(2025)Summon a demon and bind it: A grounded theory of LLM red teamingPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.031465820:1(e0314658)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314658
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The Prompt Artists
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. Empirical studies in HCI

Recommendations

The Creativity of Text-to-Image Generation
Academic Mindtrek '22: Proceedings of the 25th International Academic Mindtrek Conference

Text-guided synthesis of images has made a giant leap towards becoming a mainstream phenomenon. With text-to-image generation systems, anybody can create digital images and artworks. This provokes the question of whether text-to-image generation is ...
Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlook
Technologies related to artificial intelligence (AI) have a strong impact on the changes of research and creative practices in visual arts. The growing number of research initiatives and creative applications that emerge in the intersection of AI and art ...
Can Artificial Intelligence Make Art?: Folk Intuitions as to whether AI-driven Robots Can Be Viewed as Artists and Produce Art
In two experiments (total N = 693), we explored whether people are willing to consider paintings made by AI-driven robots as art, and robots as artists. Across the two experiments, we manipulated three factors: (i) agent type (AI-driven robot vs. human ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

C&C '23: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition

June 2023

564 pages

ISBN:9798400701801

DOI:10.1145/3591196

Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 June 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

C&C '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

C&C '23: Creativity and Cognition

June 19 - 21, 2023

Virtual Event, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 371 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

36
Total Citations
View Citations
3,788
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)2,969
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)318

Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Arsalan HHeesom DMoore N(2025)From Heritage Building Information Modelling Towards an ‘Echo-Based’ Heritage Digital TwinHeritage10.3390/heritage80100338:1(33)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8010033
Meira-Rodríguez P(2025)Creación de ambientes para niveles de videojuegos utilizando Stable DiffusionOptimizing video game level atmosphere with Stable Diffusion-assisted set dressingEuropean Public & Social Innovation Review10.31637/epsir-2025-135410(1-18)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2025-1354
Inie NStray JDerczynski L(2025)Summon a demon and bind it: A grounded theory of LLM red teamingPLOS ONE10.1371/journal.pone.031465820:1(e0314658)Online publication date: 15-Jan-2025
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314658
Rapp ADi Lodovico CTorrielli FDi Caro L(2025)How do people experience the images created by generative artificial intelligence? An exploration of people's perceptions, appraisals, and emotions related to a Gen-AI text-to-image model and its creationsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103375193:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103375
Safadi MZayegh OHawoot Z(2024)Advancing Innovation in Medical Presentations: A Guide for Medical Educators to Use Images Generated With Artificial IntelligenceCureus10.7759/cureus.74978Online publication date: 2-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74978
Antão GSilva TSiqueira N(2024)Design e as Inteligências Artificiais Gerativas: uma revisão sistemática de literaturaBlucher Design Proceedings10.5151/cidiconcic2023-15_649304(231-245)Online publication date: Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.5151/cidiconcic2023-15_649304
Gür MÇorakbaş FAtar İÇelik MMaşat İŞahin C(2024)Communicating AI for Architectural and Interior Design: Reinterpreting Traditional Iznik Tile Compositions through AI Software for Contemporary SpacesBuildings10.3390/buildings1409291614:9(2916)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14092916
Kreminski M(2024)The Dearth of the Author in AI-Supported WritingProceedings of the Third Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants10.1145/3690712.3690725(48-50)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3690712.3690725
Kreminski M(2024)Computational Poetry is Lost PoetryProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686179(1-4)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686169.3686179
Bremers AJu W(2024)Can Machines Tell What People Want? Bringing Situated Intelligence to Generative AIProceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium10.1145/3686169.3686172(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3686169.3686172
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten