skip to main content
10.1145/3591196.3596607acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Supporting Data Visualization Literacy through Embodied Interactions

Published:19 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Data visualization literacy (DVL) is increasingly important in navigating today’s world. Young students are now required to develop data visualization skills (e.g., identifying patterns, collecting, organizing, and analyzing data). Past work focuses on cultivating children’s DVL through playful and gamified approaches. However, these past solutions require hardware (e.g., smartphones) that is not readily replicable within standard classrooms. In addition, the extent of embodied interactions found in past solutions is fairly limited to large-scale interfaces. To address these challenges, we explore how to cultivate children’s DVL through embodied learning that is more apt for a classroom environment. Using a standard Google Chromebook, we designed an interface that utilizes the tracking of a fiducial marker on a wooden arrow to allow a student to author their own bar graphs. We conducted Wizard of Oz tests (n = 3) to gather feedback on the functionality of our design. This project aims to display the benefits of giving students a mode to develop their own visualizations and broaden how they can interact with data.

References

  1. Basak Alper, Nathalie Henry Riche, Fanny Chevalier, Jeremy Boy, and Metin Sezgin. 2017. Visualization Literacy at Elementary School. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5485–5497. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025877Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Sandra Bae, Ruhan Yang, Peter Gyory, Julia Uhr, Danielle Albers Szafir, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2021. Touching Information with DIY Paper Charts & AR Markers. In Interaction Design and Children (Athens, Greece) (IDC ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 433–438. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459990.3465191Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Sandra Bae, Rishi Vanukuru, Ruhan Yang, Peter Gyory, Ran Zhou, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, and Danielle Albers Szafir. 2023. Cultivating Visualization Literacy for Children Through Curiosity and Play. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 1 (2023), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209442Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Sandra Bae, Clement Zheng, Mary Etta West, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, Samuel Huron, and Danielle Albers Szafir. 2022. Making Data Tangible: A Cross-Disciplinary Design Space for Data Physicalization. In Proc. CHI. Article 81, 18 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fearn Bishop, Johannes Zagermann, Ulrike Pfeil, Gemma Sanderson, Harald Reiterer, and Uta Hinrichs. 2020. Construct-A-Vis: Exploring the Free-Form Visualization Processes of Children. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1 (2020), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934804Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Xin Chen, Jessica Zeitz Self, Leanna House, John Wenskovitch, Maoyuan Sun, Nathan Wycoff, Jane Robertson Evia, Scotland Leman, and Chris North. 2018. Be the Data: Embodied Visual Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 11, 1 (2018), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2017.2757481Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Johannes Gäbler, Christoph Winkler, Nóra Lengyel, Wolfgang Aigner, Christina Stoiber, Günter Wallner, and Simone Kriglstein. 2019. Diagram Safari: A Visualization Literacy Game for Young Children. In Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts (Barcelona, Spain) (CHI PLAY ’19 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 389–396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341215.3356283Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sergio Garrido-Jurado, Rafael Munoz-Salinas, Francisco José Madrid-Cuevas, and Rafael Medina-Carnicer. 2016. Generation of fiducial marker dictionaries using mixed integer linear programming. Pattern Recognition 51 (2016), 481–491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2005. Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Susan Goldin-Meadow, San Kim, and Melissa Singer. 1999. What the teacher’s hands tell the student’s mind about math.Journal of educational psychology 91, 4 (1999), 720.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Peter Gyory, S. Sandra Bae, Ruhan Yang, Ellen Yi-Luen Do, and Clement Zheng. 2023. Marking Material Interactions with Computer Vision. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 478, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580643Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale, Alice Thudt, Anthony Tang, and Michael Mauerer. 2014. Constructive visualization. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems. 433–442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Elaine Huynh, Angela Nyhout, Patricia Ganea, and Fanny Chevalier. 2021. Designing Narrative-Focused Role-Playing Games for Visualization Literacy in Young Children. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 2 (2021), 924–934. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030464Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Marc Leman and Pieter-Jan Maes. 2014. The role of embodiment in the perception of music. Empirical Musicology Review 9, 3-4 (2014), 236–246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lijuan Liu, Jiahao Guo, Chao Zhang, Zhangzhi Wang, Pinqi Zhu, Tuo Fang, Junwu Wang, Cheng Yao, and Fangtian Ying. 2021. ElectroPaper: Design and Fabrication of Paper-Based Electronic Interfaces for the Water Environment. Electronics 10, 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10050604Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Manuela Macedonia and Thomas R Knösche. 2011. Body in mind: How gestures empower foreign language learning. Mind, Brain, and Education 5, 4 (2011), 196–211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Francisco J Romero-Ramirez, Rafael Muñoz-Salinas, and Rafael Medina-Carnicer. 2018. Speeded up detection of squared fiducial markers. Image and vision Computing 76 (2018), 38–47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Margaret Wilson. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 4 (01 Dec 2002), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Clement Zheng, Peter Gyory, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2020. Tangible Interfaces with Printed Paper Markers. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395578Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Supporting Data Visualization Literacy through Embodied Interactions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        C&C '23: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Creativity and Cognition
        June 2023
        564 pages
        ISBN:9798400701801
        DOI:10.1145/3591196

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 June 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)138
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)27

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format