skip to main content
10.1145/3592686.3592700acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Veinseg-Net: A Novel Finger Vein Segmentation Algorithm Based on Deep Learning

Published:31 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

On the basis of the original U-Net and ResNet finger vein segmentation methods, this paper proposes a new finger vein segmentation method based on the combination of the above two methods. This method completes feature extraction by using depth residual network instead of U-Net. Using extended convolution instead of traditional convolution solves the risk of loss of finger vein information extracted by pooling layer, so that the method can extract finger vein veins more accurately without pooling. The algorithm uses the Mish constructor to replace the ReLU constructor to strengthen the anti-compression ability of the model and make vein image more continuous. From the comparison of experimental results, it is not difficult to see that the segmentation accuracy of the newly proposed Veinseg-Net network on multiple finger vein databases are better than those of other depth learning segmentation methods. The good segmentation accuracy of finger vein image can help the finger vein recognition process in the subsequent environment intelligence.

References

  1. Kono M, 2000, A new method for the identification of individuals by using of vein pattern matching of a finger. //Proc. Fifth Symposium on Pattern Measurement, Yamaguchi, Japan, pp 9-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Qiao W Y, 2015, Technical research based on internal characteristics of finger vein. Harbin Engineering University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Li S Y, 2014, Research on Key Problems of Finger Vein Recognition. Northeastern University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Yuan W Q, , 2016, Finger vein image segmentation method based on local gray minimum. Computer Technology and Development. 26 (6):109-111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yuan W Q, , 2011, Palm-vein image segmentation method based on local gray minimum. Journal of Optoelectronics. Laser, vol. 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang J, Xiao J, Lin W, , 2015, Discriminative and generative vocabulary tree: With application to vein image authentication and recognition. Image and Vision Computing. 34: 51-62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Matkowski W M, Chan F K S, Kong A W K, 2019, A study on wrist identification for forensic investigation. Image and Vision Computing. 88: 96-112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Liu X, 2019, Research of finger-vein feature extraction and anti-spoofing detection based on deep learning. Chongqing Technology and Business University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, and Brox T, 2015, U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 234-241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Guo C, Szemenyei M, Yi Y, Wang W, Chen B, and Fan C, 2021, SA-UNet: Spatial attention U-Net for retinal vessel segmentation. In 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR). IEEE, pp 1236-1242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Badrinarayanan V, Kendall A, and Cipolla R, 2017, SegNet: A deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 39(12):2481-2495.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang H, Lin L, Tong R, Hu H, Zhang Q, Iwamoto Y, Han X, Chen Y W, and Wu J, 2020, UNet 3+: A full-scale connected Unet for medical image segmentation. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, pp 1055-1059.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Chen C, Liu X, Ding M, Zheng J, and Li J, 2019, 3d dilated multi-fiber network for real-time brain tumor segmentation in MRI. In International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, pp 184-192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Brügger R, Baumgartner C F, and Konukoglu E, 2019, A partially reversible u-net for memory-efficient volumetric image segmentation. In International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, pp 429-437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Milletari F, Navab N, and Ahmadi S A, 2016, V-Net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In 2016 fourth international conference on 3D vision (3DV). IEEE, pp. 565-571.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jégou S, Drozdzal M, Vazquez D, Romero A, and Bengio Y, 2017, The one hundred layers tiramisu: Fully convolutional densenets for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp 11-19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Chen L C, Papandreou G, Kokkinos I, Murphy K, and Yuille A L, 2017, Deeplab: Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected crfs. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 40(4):834-848.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen L C, Papandreou G, Schroff F, and Adam H, 2017, Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen L C, Zhu Y, Papandreou G, Schroff F, and Adam H, 2017, Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pp 801-818.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu H, Ye C, Zhang F, Li X, and Zhang C, 2020, A medical image segmentation method with anti-noise and bias-field correction. IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp 98548-98561.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Zhang Z and Song J, 2019, An adaptive fuzzy level set model with local spatial information for medical image segmentation and bias correction. IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp 27322-27338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Shi H, Wang M, and Wang C, 2020, Pattern-based autonomous smooth switching control for constrained flexible joint manipulator. Neurocomputing 492:162-173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wu D, He Y, Luo X, , 2021, A latent factor analysis-based approach to online sparse streaming feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu D, Luo X, Shang M, , 2020, A data-characteristic-aware latent factor model for web services QoS prediction. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, and Sun J, 2016, Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 770-778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Mish M D, 2019, A self regularized non-monotonic neural activation function. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08681, 4(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu X, , 2019, Research on iris localization based on deep convolution network. Journal of Integration Technology, 5(1):57-67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Chen J, Lu Y, Yu Q, , 2021, TransUNet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.04306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Malaysian datasets, 2014: http://drfendi.com/fv_usm_database/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Shandong University datasets, 2011: http://mla.sdu.edu.cn/sdumla-hmt.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    BIC '23: Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing
    February 2023
    398 pages
    ISBN:9798400700200
    DOI:10.1145/3592686

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 31 May 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)37
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format