skip to main content
10.1145/3592686.3592716acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Focal EEG recognition combining LMD and deep reinforcement learning

Published:31 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automatic recognition of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals in epileptogenic zone is of great medical significance for computer-aided epilepsy surgery. In the analysis of EEG signals, in order to achieve the purpose of automatic recognition of EEG signals in epileptogenic zone, a method based on deep reinforcement learning is proposed in this paper. First, the local mean decomposition (LMD) algorithm is applied to decompose the original EEG signals. Statistical feature extraction is then performed. Finally, a deep reinforcement learning method, Deep Q-Network (DQN), is used to train the features and finally classify them. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the experimental classification results were 89.28%, 89.88% and 88.68%, respectively. Compared with other traditional machine learning methods, this method shows good classification results.

References

  1. C. Geier, K. Lehnertz, Which Brain Regions are Important for Seizure Dynamics in Epileptic Networks? Influence of Link Identification and EEG Recording Montage on Node Centralities, International Journal of Neural Systems 27 (1), 2017, 1650033.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Q. Yuan, W.D. Zhou, L.R. Zhang, F. Zhang, F.Z. Xu, Y. Leng, D.M. Wei, M.N. Chen, Epileptic seizure detection based on imbalanced classification and wavelet packet transform, Seizure-European Journal of Epilepsy 50, 2017, 99-108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. Baumgartner, S. Hafner, J.P. Koren, Automatic Detection of epilepsy-typical Potentials and Seizures in the EEG, Klinische Neurophysiologie 89 (9), 2017, 445-456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Baumgartner, J.P. Koren, M. Rothmayer, Automatic Computer-Based Detection of Epileptic Seizures, Frontiers in Neurology 9, 2018, 639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Narin, Detection of Focal and Non-focal Epileptic Seizure Using Continuous Wavelet Transform-Based Scalogram Images and Pre-trained Deep Neural Networks, IRBM 43 (1), 2022, 22-31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M. Diykh, S. Abdulla, K. Saleh, R.C. Deo, Fractal dimension undirected correlation graph-based support vector machine model for identification of focal and non-focal electroencephalography signals, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 54, 2019, 101611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M.M. Rahman, M.I.H. Bhuiyan, A.B. Das, Classification of focal and non-focal EEG signals in VMD-DWT domain using ensemble stacking, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 50, 2019, 72-82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S.M. Usman, S. Khalid, S. Bashir, A deep learning based ensemble learning method for epileptic seizure prediction, Computers in Biology and Medicine 136, 2021, 104710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. Shankar, H.K. Khaing, S. Dandapat, S. Barma, Analysis of epileptic seizures based on EEG using recurrence plot images and deep learning, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 69, 2021, 102854.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. W. Wu, Z. Zhou, A.R. Adhikary, B. Dutta, Discrete space reinforcement learning algorithm based on twin support vector machine classification, Pattern Recognition Letters 164, 2022, 254-260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B.B.M. Paiva, E.R. Nascimento, M.A. Goncalves, F. Belem, A reinforcement learning approach for single redundant view co-training text classification, Information Sciences 615, 2022, 24-38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R.F. Mansour, J. Escorcia-Gutierrez, M. Gamarra, J.A. Villanueva, N. Leal, Intelligent video anomaly detection and classification using faster RCNN with deep reinforcement learning model, Image and Vision Computing 112, 2021, 104229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. R.G. Andrzejak, K. Schindler, C. Rummel, Nonrandomness, nonlinear dependence, and nonstationarity of electroencephalographic recordings from epilepsy patients, Physical Review E 86 (4), 2012, 46206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. P. Gupta, B. Singh, Local mean decomposition and artificial neural network approach to mitigate tool chatter and improve material removal rate in turning operation, Applied Soft Computing 96, 2020, 106714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. X.D. Tang, M. Li, X. Lin, F. He, Online operations of automated electric taxi fleets: An advisor-student reinforcement learning framework, Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies 121, 2021, 102844.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. R. Zhao, X.J. Wang, J.J. Xia, L.S. Fan, Deep reinforcement learning based mobile edge computing for intelligent Internet of Things, Physical Communication 43, 2021, 101184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. J.Z. Zhou, L. Liu, Y. Leng, Y.Y. Yang, B. Gao, Z.H. Jiang, W.W. Nie, Q. Yuan, Both Cross-Patient and Patient-Specific Seizure Detection Based on Self-Organizing Fuzzy Logic, International Journal of Neural Systems 32 (6), 2022, 2250017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. X.Y. Zhao, T. Tanaka, W.Z. Kong, Q.B. Zhao, J.T. Cao, H. Sugano, N. Yoshiday, Epileptic Focus Localization Based on iEEG by Using Positive Unlabeled (PU) Learning, in: 2018 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC). https://doi.org/10.23919/APSIPA.2018.8659747.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. V. Gupta, R.B. Pachori, A New Method for Classification of Focal and Non-Focal EEG Signals, Machine Intelligence and Signal Analysis 748, 2018, 235–246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Bhattacharyya, M. Sharma, R.B. Pachori, P. Sircar, U.R. Acharya, A novel approach for automated detection of focal EEG signals using empirical wavelet transform, Neural Computing & Applications 29 (8), 2018, 47-57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. Akbari, M.T. Sadiq, Detection of focal and non-focal EEG signals using non-linear features derived from empirical wavelet transform rhythms, Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine 44 (1), 2021, 157–171.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    BIC '23: Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Intelligent Computing
    February 2023
    398 pages
    ISBN:9798400700200
    DOI:10.1145/3592686

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 31 May 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)21
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format