skip to main content
10.1145/3593434.3593486acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Functional Size Measurement in Agile Development: Velocity in Agile Sprints

Published:14 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Agile teams measure their velocity for performance, based on Story Points. However, such velocity does not allow predicting when the product will be finished. Story points measure effort only. They do not discriminate between creating functionality and other tasks. Non-functional requirements (NFR), such as enhancing product quality, test coverage, removing technical debt, as well as process-related NFR such as agreeing with stakeholders, getting requirements right, or documenting, consume effort but do not add functionality. Thus, it remains unclear whether the product makes any progress, or the team is just looping around. Euro Project Office has therefore developed a method how to complement a product backlog by functional size, indicating progress and completeness in unambiguous terms. The method is based on the international standard ISO/IEC 14143 and ISO/IEC 19761. NFR are understood as in . Tools are available as open source and can be used by development teams with minimum investment into training.

References

  1. ISO/IEC 14143, "Information technology - Software measurement - Functional size measurement - Part 1: Definition of concepts," ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ISO/IEC 19761, "Software engineering - COSMIC: a functional size measurement method," ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7, Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. COSMIC and IFPUG, "Glossary of terms for Non-Functional Requirements and Project Requirements used in software project performance measurement, benchmarking and estimating," September 2015. [Online]. Available: http://cosmic-sizing.org/publications/glossary-of-terms-for-nf-and-project-requirements/. [Accessed 13 April 2023].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ISO 26262-1, "Road vehicles - Functional Safety - Part 1: Vocabulary," ISO/TC 22/SC3, Geneva, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Hacaloglu and O. Demirors, "Measureability of functional size in Agile software projects - Multiple Case Studies with COSMIC FSM," in 45th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), Kallithea, Greece, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B. Meyer, Agile! - The Good, the Hype and the Ugly, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. H. v. Heeringen, "Analysis of Velocity (Delivery Speed)," ISBSG Short Papers, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Hill, Ed., Practical Software Project Estimation 3rd Edition, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Angela Maria Lungu, Editor, QSM Software Almanac, McLean, VA: Quantitative Software Management, Inc. , 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. R. Hoda, N. Salleh, J. Grundy and H. M. Tee, "Systematic literature reviews in agile software development:," Information and Software Technology, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. Commeyne, A. Abran and R. Djouab, "Effort Estimation with Story Points and COSMIC Function Points - An Industry Case Study," Software Measurements News, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 25-36, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. T. M. Fehlmann and E. Kranich, "Early Software Project Estimation the Six Sigma Way," Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 199, pp. 193-208, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. ISO 16355, "Applications of Statistical and Related Methods to New Technology and Product Development Process – Part 1: General Principles and Perspectives of Quality Function Deployment (QFD)," ISO TC 69/SC 8/WG 2 N 14, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. T. M. Fehlmann and E. Kranich, "Functional Size Measurement in Agile," in ICSEA 2021, Barcelona, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Post and C. K. Davey, "Integrating SOTIF and Agile Systems Engineering," SAE Technical Paper, Warrendale, PA, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. M. Fehlmann and E. Kranich, "Theoretical Aspects of Consumer Metrics for Safety & Privacy," Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, vol. 896, pp. 649-653, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EASE '23: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
    June 2023
    544 pages
    ISBN:9798400700446
    DOI:10.1145/3593434

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 June 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate71of232submissions,31%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format