skip to main content
research-article

A Decidable Fragment of First Order Modal Logic: Two Variable Term Modal Logic

Published:09 June 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

First order modal logic (𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫) is built by extending First Order Logic (𝖥𝖮) with modal operators. A typical formula is of the form \(\forall x \exists y \Box P(x,y)\). Not only is 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫 undecidable, even simple fragments like that of restriction to unary predicate symbols, guarded fragment and two variable fragment, which are all decidable for 𝖥𝖮 become undecidable for 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫. In this paper we study Term Modal logic (𝖳𝖬𝖫) which allows modal operators to be indexed by terms. A typical formula is of the form \(\forall x \exists y~\Box _x P(x,y)\). There is a close correspondence between 𝖳𝖬𝖫 and 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫 and we explore this relationship in detail in the paper.

In contrast to 𝖥𝖮𝖬𝖫, we show that the two variable fragment (without constants, equality) of 𝖳𝖬𝖫 is decidable. Further, we prove that adding a single constant makes the two variable fragment of 𝖳𝖬𝖫 undecidable. On the other hand, when equality is added to the logic, it loses the finite model property.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Andréka Hajnal, Németi István, and Benthem Johan van. 1998. Modal languages and bounded fragments of predicate logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27, 3 (1998), 217274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. [2] Blackburn Patrick, Rijke Maarten de, and Venema Yde. 2001. Modal Logic (Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science). Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Fine Kit. 1975. Normal forms in modal logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16, 2 (1975), 229237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Fitting Melvin and Mendelsohn Richard L.. 2012. First-order Modal Logic. Vol. 277. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Fitting Melvin, Thalmann Lars, and Voronkov Andrei. 2001. Term-modal logics. Studia Logica 69, 1 (2001), 133169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Gabbay Dov M., Skvortsov Dimitrij, and Shehtman Valentin. 2009. Quantification in Nonclassical Logic. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Grädel Erich, Kolaitis Phokion G., and Vardi Moshe Y.. 1997. On the decision problem for two-variable first-order logic. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 3, 1 (1997), 5369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Grädel Erich and Otto Martin. 1999. On logics with two variables. Theoretical Computer Science 224, 1-2 (1999), 73113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. [9] Grove Adam J. and Halpern Joseph Y.. 1993. Naming and identity in epistemic logics part I: The propositional case. Journal of Logic and Computation 3, 4 (1993), 345378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Kieroński Emanuel and Otto Martin. 2012. Small substructures and decidability issues for first-order logic with two variables. The Journal of Symbolic Logic (2012), 729765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Kontchakov Roman, Kurucz Agi, and Zakharyaschev Michael. 2005. Undecidability of first-order intuitionistic and modal logics with two variables. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11, 3 (2005), 428438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Kooi Barteld. 2007. Dynamic term-modal logic. In A Meeting of the Minds. 173186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Kripke Saul A.. 1962. The undecidability of monadic modal quantification theory. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 8, 2 (1962), 113116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. [14] Liberman Andrés Occhipinti, Achen Andreas, and Rendsvig Rasmus Kræmmer. 2020. Dynamic term-modal logics for first-order epistemic planning. Artificial Intelligence 286 (2020), 103305.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Liberman Andrés Occhipinti and Rendsvig Rasmus Kræmmer. 2020. Decidability results in first-order epistemic planning. In IJCAI. 41614167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Liu Mo, Padmanabha Anantha, Ramanujam R., and Wang Yanjing. 2022. Generalized bundled fragments for first-order modal logic. In 47th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2022) (Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs)), Szeider Stefan, Ganian Robert, and Silva Alexandra (Eds.), Vol. 241. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, 70:170:14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Mortimer Michael. 1975. On languages with two variables. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 21, 1 (1975), 135140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Orlandelli Eugenio and Corsi Giovanna. 2017. Decidable term-modal logics. In Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies. Springer, 147162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] Padmanabha Anantha. 2019. Propositional Term Modal Logic. Ph.D. Dissertation. Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Homi Bhabha National Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Padmanabha Anantha and Ramanujam R.. 2019. The monodic fragment of propositional term modal logic. Studia Logica 107, 3 (2019), 533557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Padmanabha Anantha and Ramanujam R.. 2019. Propositional modal logic with implicit modal quantification. In Logic and Its Applications - 8th Indian Conference, ICLA 2019, Delhi, India, March 1-5, 2019, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Khan Md. Aquil and Manuel Amaldev (Eds.), Vol. 11600. Springer, 617. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Padmanabha Anantha and Ramanujam R.. 2019. Two variable fragment of term modal logic. In 44th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2019). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. [23] Padmanabha Anantha, Ramanujam R., and Wang Yanjing. 2018. Bundled fragments of first-order modal logic: (Un) decidability. In 38th IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Rendsvig Rasmus K.. 2010. Epistemic term-modal logic. Proceedings of the 15th Student Session of the European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (2010), 3746.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Rybakov Mikhail and Shkatov Dmitry. 2019. Undecidability of first-order modal and intuitionistic logics with two variables and one monadic predicate letter. Studia Logica 107, 4 (2019), 695717.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Sawasaki Takahiro. 2021. A Proof-Theoretic Study of Term-Sequence-Dyadic Deontic Logic and Common Sense Modal Predicate Logic. Ph.D. Dissertation. Hokkaido University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. [27] Sawasaki Takahiro, Sano Katsuhiko, and Yamada Tomoyuki. 2019. Term-sequence-modal logics. In International Workshop on Logic, Rationality and Interaction. Springer, 244258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Shtakser Gennady. 2018. Propositional epistemic logics with quantification over agents of knowledge. Studia Logica 106, 2 (2018), 311344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. [29] Thalmann Lars. 2000. Term-modal Logic and Quantifier-free Dynamic Assignment Logic. Ph.D. Dissertation. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30] Vardi Moshe Y.. 1996. Why is modal logic so robustly decidable?. In Descriptive Complexity and Finite Models, Proceedings of a DIMACS Workshop 1996, Princeton, New Jersey, USA, January 14-17, 1996 (DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science), Immerman Neil and Kolaitis Phokion G. (Eds.), Vol. 31. DIMACS/AMS, 149183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Wang Yanjing. 2017. A new modal framework for epistemic logic. In Proceedings Sixteenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2017, Liverpool, UK, 24-26 July 2017.515534. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. [32] Wang Yanjing. 2018. Beyond knowing that: A new generation of epistemic logics. In Jaakko Hintikka on Knowledge and Game Theoretical Semantics. Springer, 499533.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] Wang Yanjing, Wei Yu, and Seligman Jeremy. 2022. Quantifier-free epistemic term-modal logic with assignment operator. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173, 3, 103071.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Wolter Frank and Zakharyaschev Michael. 2001. Decidable fragments of first-order modal logics. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 66, 3 (2001), 14151438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Anantha Padmanabha. 2021. Relative expressive powers of first order modal logic and term modal logic. In Proceedings of the (ICLA’21). Vol. 97. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=10ihAiIAAAAJ&citation_for_view10ihAiIAAAAJ:WF5omc3nYNoC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Decidable Fragment of First Order Modal Logic: Two Variable Term Modal Logic

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
      ACM Transactions on Computational Logic  Volume 24, Issue 4
      October 2023
      243 pages
      ISSN:1529-3785
      EISSN:1557-945X
      DOI:10.1145/3603763
      • Editor:
      • Anuj Dawar
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 June 2023
      • Online AM: 19 April 2023
      • Accepted: 14 April 2023
      • Revised: 7 February 2023
      • Received: 13 May 2022
      Published in tocl Volume 24, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)208
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)9

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text