skip to main content
10.1145/3593663.3593686acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecseeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning Analytics Dashboard for Educators: Proposed Project to Design with Pedagogical Background

Published:19 June 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this article, the authors describe a prototype of a Learning Analytics Dashboard (LAD) for educators. It is based on the analysis of pedagogical actions and taking into the process and learning style of students in an online environment based on learning analytics (LA). A description of the Dashboard structure, divided into levels and categories based on available learning analytics, will allow the educator to dive deeper into the online course themselves and explore more. It will also allow them to determine the level of student performance, identify gaps in learning materials, and research student data.

The authors have identified further directions for the development of a LAD for a professor, including modeling algorithms for researching student behavior and learning style using Artificial Intelligence and presenting LA in a visualized form. This paper shows the stages of creating a professor's LAD prototype as a functional part of the adaptive learning system in the HASKI-System to analyze visual information obtained from LA and the possibilities to monitor the learning process, learning progress, student activity, and make decisions on careful intervention in the students’ learning process.

References

  1. Aldosemani, Tahani I., and Ahmed Al Khateeb, 2022. Learning Loss Recovery Dashboard: A Proposed Design to Mitigate Learning. Loss Post Schools Closure. Sustainability, 14 (10), 5944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105944.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sarikaya Alper, Michael Correll, and Lyn Bartram, 2018. What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards? IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 25(1), 682-692. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864903.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lisbeth Amhag, Lisa Hellström, and Martin Stigmar, 2019. Teacher educators' use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35 (4), 203-220. DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mohamed Amine Chatti, Anna Dyckhoff, Ulrik Schroeder, and Hendrik Thüs, 2012. A reference model for learning analytics. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4 (5-6), 318-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051815.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Linda Van den Bergh, Anje Ros, and Douwe Beijaard, 2013. Teacher feedback during active learning: Current practices in primary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83 (2), 341-362. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2013.767188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Andreas Buja, Dianne Cook, and Deborah F. F. Swayne, 1996. Interactive high-dimensional data visualization. Journal of computational and graphical statistics, 5 (1), 78-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1390754.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tinne De Laet, Martijn Millecamp, Tom Broos. 2020. Explainable Learning Analytics: challenges and opportunities. In Companion Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge LAK20 Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR), 500 – 510. DOI: 10.1177/0002764213479363.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomas Cavanagh, Baiyun Chen, and RAM Lahcen. 2020. Constructing a design framework and pedagogical approach for adaptive learning in higher education: A practitioner's perspective. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21 (1), 173-197. DOI: doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i1.4557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Doug Clow, 2013. An overview of learning analytics. Teaching in Higher Education, 18 (6), 683-695. DOI:10.1080/13562517.2013.827653.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dirk Ifenthaler, and Hendrik Drachsler, 2020. Learning Analytics: Spezielle Forschungsmethoden in der Bildungstechnologie. Handbuch Bildungstechnologie: Konzeption und Einsatz digitaler Lernumgebungen, 515-534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_42-1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Anna Dyckhoff, Vlatko Lukarov, Mohamed Amine Chatti and Ulrik Schroeder, 2013. Supporting action research with learning analytics. Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, 220-229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Siemens, George, 2004. Elearnspace. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Elearnspace. org, 2004, 14-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03250.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Didik Hariyanto. 2020. An Adaptive E-Learning System based on Student's Learning Styles and Knowledge Level. Ph.D. Dissertation. Technische Universität Dresden. Gutachten: Köhler, Triyono.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sabine Graf, Kinshuk and Cindy Ives. 2010. A Flexible Mechanism for Providing Adaptivity Based on Learning Styles in Learning Management Systems. In 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 30-34. DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2010.16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Goldie, John Gerard Scott, 2016. Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical teacher, 38 (10), 1064-1069. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Brotherton Haleh, Jessica Manning, and Marisa Orr. 2022. Design of the Academic Dashboard: A Tool to Enhance Students’ Efficacy in Decision-Making (WIP). In: 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Roope Jaakonmäki, Jan vom Brocke, Stefan Dietze, Hendrik Drachsler, Albrecht Fortenbacher, Rene Helbig, Michael Kickmeier- Rust, Ivana Marenzi, Angel Suarez, Haeseon Yun. 2020. Learning Analytics Cookbook. How to Support Learning Processes Through Data Analytics and Visualization. SpringerBriefs in Business Process Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43377-2%7D.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Keller, Peter R., and Scott Markel, 1994. Visual cues: practical data visualization. Computers in Physics, 8(3), 297-298. DOI: 10.1063/1.4823299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Anouschka van Leeuwen, and Nikol Rummel, 2017. Teacher regulation of collaborative learning: research directions for learning analytics dashboards. Making a Difference: Prioritizing Equity and Access in CSCL 2(805-806), 1939-1382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Vlatko Lukarov, Mohamed Amine Chatti, and Ulrik Schroeder, 2015. Learning Analytics Evaluation-Beyond Usability. DeLFI Workshops, 123-131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Luis Magdiel Oliva-Cordova, Antonio Garcia-Cabot, and Hector R. Amado-Salvatierra, 2021. Learning Analytics to Support Teaching Skills: A Systematic Literature Review. A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 9, 58351-58363. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Inge Molenaar, and Carolien AN Knoop-van Campen, 2018. How teachers make dashboard information actionable. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 347-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2851585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kawa Nazemi, and Dirk Burkhardt, 2019. Visual analytical dashboards for comparative analytical tasks–a case study on mobility and transportation. Procedia Computer Science, 149, 138-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.117.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Erik Roelofs, and Piet Sanders, 2007. Towards a Framework for Assessing Teacher Competence. European journal of vocational training, 40 (1), 123-139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Harry B. Santoso, Batuparan, A. K., R. Yugo Kartono Isal, 2018. The development of a learning dashboard for lecturers: A case study on a student-centered e-learning environment. The Journal of Educators Online, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2018.1.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ben Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. 1996. In Proceedings 1996 IEEE symposium on visual languages. IEEE, 336-343. DOI: 10.1109/VL.1996.545307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Barbara A. Soloman, and Richard M. Felder. 2005. Index of Learning Styles questionnaire: NC State University. Available online at: http://www. engr. ncsu. edu/learningstyles/ilsweb. html (last visited on 23.03. 2023), 70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ji Soo Yi, Younah Kang, and John Stasko, 2007. Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 13(6), 1224-1231. DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2007.70515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Carolyn Wilson, Grizzle, A., Ramon R. Tuazon, Kwame Akyempong, and Cheung. 2011. Alfabetización Mediática e informacional: Curriculum para profesores. UNESCO. Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Greller Wolfgang, and Hendrik Drachsler, 2012. Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 2012, 15.3: 42-57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Seghroucheni, Yassine Zaoui, Mohammed Al Achhab, and Badr Eddin El Mohajir, 2014. Revisiting the Didactic Triangle in the Case of an Adaptive Learning System. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 4(4), 27-32. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v4i4.3891.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Learning Analytics Dashboard for Educators: Proposed Project to Design with Pedagogical Background

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ECSEE '23: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Software Engineering Education
      June 2023
      264 pages
      ISBN:9781450399562
      DOI:10.1145/3593663

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 June 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate11of16submissions,69%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)73
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)7

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format