skip to main content
10.1145/3593743.3593761acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-tConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ancestral and Cultural Futuring: Speculative Design in an Indigenous ovaHimba context

Published:29 May 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the first instance and experience of futuring in two indigenous ovaHimba communities in northwest Namibia. Over a series of sessions, we, as part of a broad green energy access project, explore futuring to stimulate and invoke alternative green energy use cases. These alternatives are premised on the opposition of the dominant needs-based and interventionist approach and imagination of unorthodox green energy utilisation that supersedes mainstream, rudimentary and obvious energy use. We reflect on the application of futuring, particularly speculative design, in an indigenous context, highlighting the communities’ back-looking future perspective, and relevance and influence of ancestry and culture over the future. As well as accentuate the friction towards speculative design, arguing for its appropriation and alignment to a more grounded design approach. Moreover, we indicate the agency that it provides, allowing local participants to re-evaluate their values and practices and simultaneously determine the integration of technology into the future.

References

  1. Muhammad Sadi Adamu. 2022. No More ‘Solutionism’ or ‘Saviourism’ in Futuring African HCI: A Manyfesto. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (nov 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3571811Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Philip Kofi Adom, Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah, Mawunyo Prosper Agradi, and Aimable Nsabimana. 2021. Energy poverty, development outcomes, and transition to green energy. Renewable Energy 178 (2021), 1337–1352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Yoko Akama, Seth Keen, and Peter West. 2016. Speculative Design and Heterogeneity in Indigenous Nation Building(DIS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 895–899. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901852Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sarpong Hammond Antwi and Debora Ley. 2021. Renewable energy project implementation in Africa: Ensuring sustainability through community acceptability. Scientific African 11 (2021), e00679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Nicolas A Balcom Raleigh and Sirkka Heinonen. 2019. Entangling and elevating creativity and criticality in participatory futuring engagements. World Futures Review 11, 2 (2019), 141–162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Laura Barendregt and Nora S Vaage. 2021. Speculative design as thought experiment. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 7, 3 (2021), 374–402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Olivier Bargain and Ulugbek Aminjonov. 2021. Poverty and covid-19 in africa and latin america. World development 142 (2021), 105422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Karl Baumann, Benjamin Stokes, François Bar, and Ben Caldwell. 2017. Infrastructures of the imagination: Community design for speculative urban technologies. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. 266–269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Roy Bendor, Elina Eriksson, and Daniel Pargman. 2021. Looking backward to the future: On past-facing approaches to futuring. Futures 125 (2021), 102666.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mario Blaser. 2013. Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: Toward a conversation on political ontology. Current anthropology 54, 5 (2013), 547–568.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gerhard Bruyns and Stavros Kousoulas. 2022. An Introduction to Design Commons. In Design Commons: Practices, Processes and Crossovers. Springer, 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Simran Chopra, Rachel E Clarke, Adrian K Clear, Sara Heitlinger, Ozge Dilaver, and Christina Vasiliou. 2022. Negotiating Sustainable Futures in Communities through Participatory Speculative Design and Experiments in Living. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 334, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501929Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Federico Demaria and Ashish Kothari. 2017. The Post-Development Dictionary agenda: paths to the pluriverse. Third World Quarterly 38, 12 (2017), 2588–2599.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. C DiSalvo. 2012. Spectacles and tropes: Speculative design and contemporary food cultures. Fibreculture 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mikko Dufva, Outi Kettunen, Anna Aminoff, Maria Antikainen, Henna Sundqvist-Andberg, and Timo Tuomisto. 2016. Approaches to gaming the future: planning a foresight game on circular economy. In Games and Learning Alliance: 4th International Conference, GALA 2015, Rome, Italy, December 9-11, 2015, Revised Selected Papers 4. Springer, 560–571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2001. Design noir: The secret life of electronic objects. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Arturo Escobar. 2011. Sustainability: Design for the pluriverse. Development 54 (2011), 137–140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Pedro Gil Farias, Roy Bendor, and Bregje F. van Eekelen. 2022. Social Dreaming Together: A Critical Exploration of Participatory Speculative Design. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2022 - Volume 2 (Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (PDC ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1145/3537797.3537826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Alix Gerber. 2018. Participatory Speculation: Futures of Public Safety. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial - Volume 2 (Hasselt and Genk, Belgium) (PDC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210604.3210640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Isobel Green and Jarkko Saarinen. 2022. Changing Environment and the Political Ecology of Authenticity in Heritage Tourism: A Case of the Ovahimba and the Ju/’Hoansi-San Living Museums in Namibia. In Southern African Perspectives on Sustainable Tourism Management: Tourism and Changing Localities. Springer, 139–152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Miriam Ndalilashiwa Hamunyela, Haaveshe Nekongo-Nielsen, and Alex Kanyimba. 2019. Indigenous Knowledge on Health care among the Ovahimba Community of Oukongo Village in Kunene Region of Namibia. Journal for Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences 8, 2 (2019), 107–140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Christina Harrington and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2021. Eliciting Tech Futures Among Black Young Adults: A Case Study of Remote Speculative Co-Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 397, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445723Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sara Heitlinger, Rachel Clarke, Adrian K Clear, Simran Chopra, and Özge Dilaver. 2019. Co-Creating" Smart" Sustainable Food Futures with Urban Food Growers. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies-Transforming Communities. 114–120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jesse Hoffman, Peter Pelzer, Loes Albert, Tine Béneker, Maarten Hajer, and Astrid Mangnus. 2021. A futuring approach to teaching wicked problems. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 45, 4 (2021), 576–593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kasper Hornbæk and Morten Hertzum. 2017. Technology Acceptance and User Experience: A Review of the Experiential Component in HCI. 24, 5, Article 33 (oct 2017), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3127358Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Noura Howell, Britta F. Schulte, Amy Twigger Holroyd, Rocío Fatás Arana, Sumita Sharma, and Grace Eden. 2021. Calling for a Plurality of Perspectives on Design Futuring: An Un-Manifesto(CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 31, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450364Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Alexander Ivanov, Tim Au Yeung, Kathryn Blair, Kurtis Danyluk, Georgina Freeman, Marcus Friedel, Carmen Hull, Michael Yuk-Shing Hung, Sydney Pratte, and Wesley Willett. 2022. One Week in the Future: Previs Design Futuring for HCI Research(CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 542, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517584Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Margaret Jacobsohn and Garth Owen-Smith. 2003. Integrating conservation and development: a Namibian case study. Nomadic Peoples (2003), 92–109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Anne Marie Kanstrup, Pernille Bertelsen, and Jacob Østergaard Madsen. 2014. Design with the Feet: Walking Methods and Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (Windhoek, Namibia) (PDC ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661435.2661441Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sandjar Kozubaev, Chris Elsden, Noura Howell, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Nick Merrill, Britta Schulte, and Richmond Y. Wong. 2020. Expanding Modes of Reflection in Design Futuring(CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376526Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. John Law. 2015. What’s wrong with a one-world world?Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16, 1 (2015), 126–139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaimaa Lazem. 2021. HCI education of choice: on becoming critical and growing inclusivity. XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 27, 3 (2021), 46–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Renata M. Leitão. 2022. From Needs to Desire: Pluriversal Design as a Desire-Based Design. Design and Culture 14, 3 (2022), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2022.2103949 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2022.2103949Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Paul Lucas, Anteneh Dagnachew, and Andries Hof. 2017. Towards universal electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa: A quantitative analysis of technology and investment requirements. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. https://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/pbl-2017-towards-universal-electricity-access-in-sub-saharan-africa-1952_3.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Donovan Maasz, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Colin Stanley, Kasper Rodil, and Uriaike Mbinge. 2018. A digital indigenous knowledge preservation framework: the 7C model—repositioning IK holders in the digitization of IK. Digitisation of culture: Namibian and international perspectives (2018), 29–47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Ezio Manzini. 2015. Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramia Mazé 2019. Politics of designing visions of the future. Journal of Futures Studies 23, 3 (2019), 23–38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Muntasir Murshed and Ilhan Ozturk. 2023. Rethinking energy poverty reduction through improving electricity accessibility: a regional analysis on selected African nations. Energy 267 (2023), 126547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Harold G Nelson and Erik Stolterman. 2014. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. MIT press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Benyoh Emmanuel Kigha Nsafon, Hemen Mark Butu, Abdulhameed Babatunde Owolabi, Jong Wook Roh, Dongjun Suh, and Jeung-Soo Huh. 2020. Integrating multi-criteria analysis with PDCA cycle for sustainable energy planning in Africa: Application to hybrid mini-grid system in Cameroon. Sustainable energy technologies and assessments 37 (2020), 100628.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Jeroen Oomen, Jesse Hoffman, and Maarten A Hajer. 2022. Techniques of futuring: On how imagined futures become socially performative. European Journal of Social Theory 25, 2 (2022), 252–270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Amaya Querejazu. 2016. Encountering the pluriverse: Looking for alternatives in other worlds. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 59 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Sarah Rüller, Konstantin Aal, Peter Tolmie, Andrea Hartmann, Markus Rohde, and Volker Wulf. 2022. Speculative Design as a Collaborative Practice: Ameliorating the Consequences of Illiteracy through Digital Touch. 29, 3, Article 23 (jan 2022), 58 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487917Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Elmedin Selmanović, Selma Rizvic, Carlo Harvey, Dusanka Boskovic, Vedad Hulusic, Malek Chahin, and Sanda Sljivo. 2020. Improving Accessibility to Intangible Cultural Heritage Preservation Using Virtual Reality. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. 13, 2, Article 13 (may 2020), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377143Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Luigia Simona Sica, Elisabetta Crocetti, Giancarlo Ragozini, Laura Aleni Sestito, and Toni Serafini. 2016. Future-oriented or present-focused? The role of social support and identity styles on ‘futuring’in Italian late adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Youth Studies 19, 2 (2016), 183–203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Linda Tuhiwai Smith. 2005. On tricky ground. The Sage handbook of qualitative research 3 (2005), 85–107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephen Snow, Awais Hameed Khan, Mashhuda Glencross, and Neil Horrocks. 2021. Neighbourhood Wattch: Using Speculative Design to Explore Values Around Curtailment and Consent in Household Energy Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 643, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445095Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Robert Soden, Pradnaya Pathak, and Olivia Doggett. 2021. What We Speculate About When We Speculate About Sustainable HCI. In ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (Virtual Event, Australia) (COMPASS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/3460112.3471956Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Alessandro Soro, Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, and Margot Brereton. 2019. Designing the Past. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310424Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Michael Stead and Paul Coulton. 2022. Sustainable Technological Futures: Moving beyond a One-World-World Perspective. In Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference (Aarhus, Denmark) (NordiCHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 97, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546155.3547283Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Cameron Tonkinwise. 2014. How we intend to future: review of Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby, speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. Design Philosophy Papers 12, 2 (2014), 169–187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Emmanuel Tsekleves, Clarissa Ai Ling Lee, Min Hooi Yong, and Sian Lun Lau. 2022. Exploring the use of speculative design as a participatory approach to more inclusive policy-identification and development in Malaysia. Design Studies 81 (2022), 101118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Gertjan van Stam. 2020. Power Inequities: Observations on the Development of Information and Communication Technologies, from an African Place. In 12th ACM Conference on Web Science Companion (Southampton, United Kingdom) (WebSci ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394332.3402830Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Magalhães João Viera and Nick Couldry. 2021. Giving by taking away: big tech, data colonialism and the reconfiguration of social good. International Journal of Communication 15 (2021), 343–362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Heike Winschiers-Theophilus, Tariq Zaman, and Alvin Yeo. 2015. Reducing" white elephant" ICT4D projects: a community-researcher engagement. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. 99–107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ancestral and Cultural Futuring: Speculative Design in an Indigenous ovaHimba context

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      C&T '23: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Communities and Technologies
      May 2023
      279 pages
      ISBN:9798400707582
      DOI:10.1145/3593743

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 May 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate80of183submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format