skip to main content
10.1145/3594536.3595139acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conceptual Questions in Developing Expert-Annotated Data

Published:07 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we argue that nuanced expert annotation often requires a significant rethinking of the traditional paradigms of data annotation. In a small pilot study, we find that even the most highly trained experts demonstrate significant heterogeneity in their evaluation of the document-level coherence of bespoke contracts. The outcomes of our study provide preliminary considerations of how paradigms of document annotation should fully utilize expert annotations in bespoke contexts.

References

  1. Ilias Chalkidis, Abhik Jana, Dirk Hartung, Michael Bommarito, Ion Androutsopoulos, Daniel Martin Katz, and Nikolaos Aletras. 2021. LexGLUE: A benchmark dataset for legal language understanding in English. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.00976 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Anya Chen, and Spencer Ball. 2021. Cuad: An expert-annotated nlp dataset for legal contract review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06268 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yuta Koreeda and Christopher D Manning. 2021. ContractNLI: A dataset for document-level natural language inference for contracts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01799 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Khiem H Le, Tuan V Tran, Hieu H Pham, Hieu T Nguyen, Tung T Le, and Ha Q Nguyen. 2022. Learning from multiple expert annotators for enhancing anomaly detection in medical image analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10611 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Spyretta Leivaditi, Julien Rossi, and Evangelos Kanoulas. 2020. A benchmark for lease contract review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10386 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jessica C. Pearlman. 2021. 2021 ABA PRIVATE TARGET MERGERS ACQUISITIONS DEAL POINTS STUDY. Retrieved May 5, 2023 from https://www.klgates.com/2021-ABA-Private-Target-Mergers-Acquisitions-Deal-Points-Study-12-31-2021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Paul Röttger, Bertie Vidgen, Dirk Hovy, and Janet B Pierrehumbert. 2021. Two contrasting data annotation paradigms for subjective nlp tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07475 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Steven H Wang, Antoine Scardigli, Leonard Tang, Wei Chen, Dimitry Levkin, Anya Chen, Spencer Ball, Thomas Woodside, Oliver Zhang, and Dan Hendrycks. 2023. MAUD: An Expert-Annotated Legal NLP Dataset for Merger Agreement Understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00876 (2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Spencer Williams. 2020. Contracts as systems. Del. J. Corp. L. 45 (2020), 219.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Conceptual Questions in Developing Expert-Annotated Data

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Other conferences
                  ICAIL '23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
                  June 2023
                  499 pages
                  ISBN:9798400701979
                  DOI:10.1145/3594536

                  Copyright © 2023 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 7 September 2023

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article
                  • Research
                  • Refereed limited

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate69of169submissions,41%
                • Article Metrics

                  • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
                  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

                  Other Metrics

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader