skip to main content
10.1145/3594536.3595141acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improving Translation of Case Descriptions into Logical Fact Formulas using LegalCaseNER

Published:07 September 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The automated translation of natural language text into structured logical representations is a critical task in various applications, including legal reasoning and decision-making. This paper presents a Name Entity Recognition (NER) based approach for translating the legal case descriptions written in natural language into PROLEG fact formulas. The approach comprises (1) extracting legal entities from the case description using a specialized NER model, namely LegalCaseNER and (2) transforming the extracted entities into PROLEG fact formulas using PROLEG rules. The experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed approach in accurately extracting relevant entities from legal case descriptions and translating them into the appropriate PROLEG fact formulas. Our approach provides a promising solution for handling complex and diverse case descriptions, enabling their representation in a structured format. This work provides a foundation for future research in the application of logical fact formulas in legal reasoning and decision-making.

References

  1. Satoh K, Kubota M, Nishigai Y, Takano C. Translating the Japanese Presupposed Ultimate Fact Theory into Logic Programming. In: Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2009: The Twenty-Second Annual Conference; 2009. p. 162--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Satoh K, Asai K, Kogawa T, Kubota M, Nakamura M, Nishigai Y, et al. PROLEG: an implementation of the presupposed ultimate fact theory of Japanese civil code by PROLOG technology. In: JSAI international symposium on artificial intelligence. Springer; 2010. p. 153--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ito S. Lecture series on ultimate facts. Shojihomu (in Japanese). 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. McCarty, L.T.: Deep semantic interpretations of legal texts. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. pp. 217--224. ICAIL '07, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nakamura, M., Nobuoka, S., Shimazu, A.: Towards translation of legal sentences into logical forms. JSAI-isAI 2007: New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence pp. 349--362 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lagos, N., Segond, F., Castellani, S., ONeill, J.: Event extraction for legal case building and reasoning. Intelligent Information Processing V, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 340, pp. 92--101 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bajwa, I., B., L.M., Behzad: Sbvr business rules generation from natural language specification. In: AAAI 2011 Spring Symposium AI for Business Agility. pp. 2--8. San Francisco, USA (2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Navas-Loro, M., Satoh, K., & Rodríguez-Doncel, V. ContractFrames: bridging the gap between natural language and logic in contract law. JSAI-isAI 2018: New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence pp. 101--114 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nguyen, H. T., Wachara, F., Nishino, F., & Satoh, K. (2022). A Multi-Step Approach in Translating Natural Language into Logical Formula. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (pp. 103--112). IOS Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lewis M, Liu Y, Goyal N, Ghazvininejad M, Mohamed A, Levy O, et al. Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:191013461. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan JD, Dhariwal P, et al. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2020; 33:1877--901.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T. (2019). DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper, and lighter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Manning, C.D., et al.: The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the ACL 2014, System Demonstrations, pp. 55--60 (2014)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yonghui Wu, Mike Schuster, Zhifeng Chen, Quoc V Le, Mohammad Norouzi, Wolfgang Macherey, Maxim Krikun, Yuan Cao, Qin Gao, Klaus Macherey, et al. 2016. Google's neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Papineni K, Roukos S, Ward T, Zhu WJ. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics; 2002. p. 311--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lin CY. Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Text summarization branches out; 2004. p. 74--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Och, Franz Josef, and Hermann Ney. The alignment template approach to statistical machine translation. Computational linguistics. 2004;30(4):417--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zettlemoyer, L.S., Collins, M.: Learning to Map Sentences to Logical Form: Structured Classification with Probabilistic Categorial Grammars. In: UAI. pp. 658--666. AUAI Press (2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Costantini, S., Paolucci, A.: Towards Translating Natural Language Sentences into ASP. In: Faber, W., Leone, N. (eds.) CILC. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 598. CEUR-WS.org (2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaur, S., Vo, N. H., Kashihara, K., & Baral, C. (2015). Translating simple legal text to formal representations. In New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: JSAIisAI 2014 Workshops, LENLS, JURISIN, and GABA, Kanagawa, Japan, October 27-28, 2014, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 259-273). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improving Translation of Case Descriptions into Logical Fact Formulas using LegalCaseNER

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICAIL '23: Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
          June 2023
          499 pages
          ISBN:9798400701979
          DOI:10.1145/3594536

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 7 September 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate69of169submissions,41%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader