skip to main content
10.1145/3594738.3611370acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Estimating Attention Allocation by Electrodermal Activity

Published:08 October 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Electrodermal activity (EDA) represents changes in the electrical activity of the palmar skin and serves as an indicator of sympathetic nervous system activity. This paper presents a novel method for estimating attention allocation under divided attention conditions using only EDA data. Our approach involves the use of the low-frequency power spectrum derived from the phasic component of EDA associated with attentional focus, combined with a machine learning classification model. We conducted three user studies aimed at estimating participants’ attention allocation during the performance of simple tasks under both visual and auditory stimuli where the frequencies of the stimuli were different, identical, or ambiguous. The goal was to estimate whether participants focused on visual or auditory stimuli. The results showed that our method could estimate attention allocation with the accuracy of 96% and 73% when the frequencies of the two stimuli were different and ambiguous, respectively, and could not estimate when the frequencies were identical.

References

  1. James A Arnett and Seth S Labovitz. 1995. Effect of physical layout in performance of the Trail Making Test.Psychological Assessment 7, 2 (1995), 220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.2.220Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ebrahim Babaei, Benjamin Tag, Tilman Dingler, and Eduardo Velloso. 2021. A Critique of Electrodermal Activity Practices at CHI. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445370Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Stefania Cecchi, Agnese Piersanti, Angelica Poli, and Susanna Spinsante. 2020. Physical stimuli and emotions: EDA features analysis from a wrist-worn measurement sensor. In 2020 IEEE 25th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD). IEEE, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAMAD50429.2020.9209307Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Lan-lan Chen, Ao Zhang, and Xiao-guang Lou. 2019. Cross-subject driver status detection from physiological signals based on hybrid feature selection and transfer learning. Expert Systems with Applications 137 (2019), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Francesco Chiossi, Yagiz Turgut, Robin Welsch, and Sven Mayer. 2023. Adapting Visual Complexity Based on Electrodermal Activity Improves Working Memory Performance in Virtual Reality. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact 7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1145/3604243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Francesco Chiossi, Robin Welsch, Steeven Villa, Lewis Chuang, and Sven Mayer. 2022. Virtual reality adaptation using electrodermal activity to support the user experience. Big Data and Cognitive Computing 6, 2 (2022), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6020055Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Marvin M Chun, Julie D Golomb, and Nicholas B Turk-Browne. 2011. A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual review of psychology 62 (2011), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Natalia B Fernandez, Wiebke J Trost, and Patrik Vuilleumier. 2019. Brain networks mediating the influence of background music on selective attention. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience 14, 12 (2019), 1441–1452. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Society for Psychophysiological Research Ad Hoc Committee on Electrodermal Measures, Wolfram Boucsein, Don C Fowles, Sverre Grimnes, Gershon Ben-Shakhar, Walton T Roth, Michael E Dawson, and Diane L Filion. 2012. Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Psychophysiology 49, 8 (2012), 1017–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01384.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Pascal E Fortin, Elisabeth Sulmont, and Jeremy Cooperstock. 2019. Detecting perception of smartphone notifications using skin conductance responses. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300420Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Timothy Greer, Benjamin Ma, Matthew Sachs, Assal Habibi, and Shrikanth Narayanan. 2019. A multimodal view into music’s effect on human neural, physiological, and emotional experience. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343031.3350867Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sogand Hasanzadeh, Behzad Esmaeili, and Michael D Dodd. 2017. Measuring the impacts of safety knowledge on construction workers’ attentional allocation and hazard detection using remote eye-tracking technology. Journal of management in engineering 33, 5 (2017), 04017024. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000526Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Mahmoud Hashash, Maya Abou Zeid, and Nadine Marie Moacdieh. 2019. Social media browsing while driving: Effects on driver performance and attention allocation. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 63 (2019), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.03.021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Luca Kiss and Karina J Linnell. 2021. The effect of preferred background music on task-focus in sustained attention. Psychological research 85, 6 (2021), 2313–2325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01400-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Simon Ladouce, David I Donaldson, Paul A Dudchenko, and Magdalena Ietswaart. 2019. Mobile EEG identifies the re-allocation of attention during real-world activity. Scientific reports 9, 1 (2019), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51996-yGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Liat Liberman and Ilana Dubovi. 2023. The effect of the modality principle to support learning with virtual reality: An eye-tracking and electrodermal activity study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 39, 2 (2023), 547–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12763Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Russell A Lockhart. 1972. Interrelations between amplitude, latency, rise time, and the Edelberg recovery measure of the galvanic skin response. Psychophysiology 9, 4 (1972), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1972.tb01791.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nobuo Masataka and Leonid Perlovsky. 2013. Cognitive interference can be mitigated by consonant music and facilitated by dissonant music. Scientific Reports 3, 1 (2013), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02028Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Éva Nadon, Barbara Tillmann, Arnaud Saj, and Nathalie Gosselin. 2021. The emotional effect of background music on selective attention of adults. Frontiers in Psychology (2021), 4472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.729037Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Matthew KXJ Pan, Jih-Shiang Chang, Gokhan H Himmetoglu, AJung Moon, Thomas W Hazelton, Karon E MacLean, and Elizabeth A Croft. 2011. Now where was I? Physiologically-triggered bookmarking. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978995Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Thomas D Parsons and Christopher G Courtney. 2016. Interactions between threat and executive control in a virtual reality stroop task. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 9, 1 (2016), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2569086Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hugo F Posada-Quintero and Ki H Chon. 2016. Frequency-domain electrodermal activity index of sympathetic function. In 2016 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI). IEEE, 497–500. https://doi.org/10.1109/BHI.2016.7455943Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tsugunosuke Sakai, Haruya Tamaki, Yosuke Ota, Ryohei Egusa, Shigenori Inagaki, Fusako Kusunoki, Masanori Sugimoto, Hiroshi Mizoguchi, 2017. EDA-based estimation of visual attention by observation of eye blink frequency. International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems 10, 2 (2017), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2017-212Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. G Turpin, T Grandfield, and G Fink. 2009. Electrodermal activity. Stress Science: Neuroendocrinology (2009), 313–316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Theresa F Wechsler, Michael Pfaller, Rahel E van Eickels, Luise H Schulz, and Andreas Mühlberger. 2021. Look at the audience? a randomized controlled study of shifting attention from self-focus to nonsocial vs. social external stimuli during virtual reality exposure to public speaking in social anxiety. Frontiers in psychiatry 12 (2021), 751272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.751272Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jinn-Tsai Wong and Shih-Hsuan Huang. 2013. Attention allocation patterns in naturalistic driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention 58 (2013), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Estimating Attention Allocation by Electrodermal Activity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISWC '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      October 2023
      145 pages
      ISBN:9798400701993
      DOI:10.1145/3594738

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 October 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

      Upcoming Conference

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)105
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format