skip to main content
10.1145/3594806.3594809acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modeling Behavior, Perception, and Cognition of Pilots in a Real-time Training Assistance Application

Published:10 August 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Obtaining quantifiable information about the behavior, perception, and cognition of aircraft pilots in simulator training processes is a key component in realizing Competence-based Training and Assessment (CBTA) principles. In this paper, we present the FlightAnalyser system, a real-time monitoring and assessment framework that is applicable in any flight simulator environment and even extendable to real-world flight. Using mobile eye tracking technology, it provides a 3D visualization of the trainee’s gaze in their environment, thereby allowing for investigation of gaze distribution and metrics based on dwell times on and transitions between areas of interest. Furthermore, the system provides a real-time estimate of cognitive load via pupil dilation, algorithmically correcting for the effect of environmental light intensity. The system has been deployed at a flight training facility, and has been in use by trainees and instructors, with early results allowing for a validation of the basic functionalities. The aim of the FlightAnalyser is to aid the transition away from ‘hours of experience’ in as the competence metric in flight training. It enables trainees as well as instructors to assess and estimate procedural, behavioral and psychophysiological indicators and progress in the workflow to enable deductions about skill levels, and allows for an individual adaption of training plans both run-time and on the scale of long-term training schedules.

References

  1. 2023. Pupil Labs. https://pupil-labs.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. J. Bayuk. 2008. Aviation safety management systems as a template for aligning safety with business strategy in other industries. In American Society of Safety Engineers-The Business of Safety: A Matter of Success Symposium. Baltimore, Maryland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Joan Cahill, Tiziana C. Callari, Florian Fortmann, Stefan Suck, Denis Javaux, Andreas Hasselberg, and Sybert Stroeve. 2018. Adaptive Automation and the Third Pilot. In Aircraft Technology. IntechOpen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kurt Colvin, Rahul Dodhia, and R Dismukes. 2005. Is pilots’ visual scanning adequate to avoid mid-air collisions?. In 2005 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. 141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Steven L. Estes, Kevin J. Burns, John R. Helleberg, Kevin M. Long, Matthew E. Pollack, and Jeffrey L. Stein. 2016. Digital Copilot: Cognitive Assistance for Pilots. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. European Aviation Safety Agency. 2012. Certification Specifications for Aeroplane Flight Simulation Training Devices.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Latoya Gibbs, Lisa Slevitch, and Isaac Washburn. 2017. Competency-based training in aviation: The impact on flight attendant performance and passenger satisfaction. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research 26, 2 (2017), 55–80.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Benedikt Gollan and Alois Ferscha. 2016. Modeling pupil dilation as online input for estimation of cognitive load in non-laboratory attention-aware systems. COGNITIVE (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bert Hoeks and Willem JM Levelt. 1993. Pupillary dilation as a measure of attention: A quantitative system analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25, 1 (1993), 16–26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. International Civil Aviation Organisation. 2022. Safety Report. Retrieved January 17, 2023, from https://www.icao.int/safety/Documents/ICAO_SR_2022.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Suzanne K Kearns, Timothy J Mavin, and Steven Hodge. 2017. Competency-based education in aviation: Exploring alternate training pathways. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Richard Yeun Chee Kin. 2015. The Impact of Safety Management Systems on Safety Performance: Commercial Aviation Operations. (2015), 213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Oliver W Klaproth, Marc Halbrügge, Laurens R Krol, Christoph Vernaleken, Thorsten O Zander, and Nele Russwinkel. 2020. A neuroadaptive cognitive model for dealing with uncertainty in tracing pilots’ cognitive state. Topics in cognitive science 12, 3 (2020), 1012–1029.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Olivier Lefrancois, Nadine Matton, Yves Gourinat, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, and Mickael Causse. 2016. The role of Pilots’ monitoring strategies in flight performance. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wen-Chin Li, Andreas Horn, Zhen Sun, Jingyi Zhang, and Graham Braithwaite. 2020. Augmented visualization cues on primary flight display facilitating pilot’s monitoring performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 135 (2020), 102377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jing Liu, Alessandro Gardi, Subramanian Ramasamy, Yixiang Lim, and Roberto Sabatini. 2016. Cognitive pilot-aircraft interface for single-pilot operations. Knowledge-Based Systems 112 (2016), 37–53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Christophe Lounis, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, and Mickaël Causse. 2019. Flight eye tracking assistant (feta): Proof of concept. In International conference on applied human factors and ergonomics. Springer, 739–751.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Christophe Lounis, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, and Mickaël Causse. 2020. Lempel-Ziv Complexity of dwell sequences: visual scanning pattern differences between novice and expert aircraft pilots. In Eye-Tracking in Aviation. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop (ETAVI 2020). ISAE-SUPAERO, Université de Toulouse; Institute of Cartography and …, 61–68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Christophe Lounis, Vsevolod Peysakhovich, and Mickaël Causse. 2021. Visual scanning strategies in the cockpit are modulated by pilots’ expertise: A flight simulator study. PLOS ONE 16, 2 (02 2021), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247061Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Svetlana Ognjanovic, Manfred Thüring, Ryan O Murphy, and Christoph Hölscher. 2019. Display clutter and its effects on visual attention distribution and financial risk judgment. Applied ergonomics 80 (2019), 168–174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Manuele Reani, Niels Peek, and Caroline Jay. 2018. An investigation of the effects of n-gram length in scanpath analysis for eye-tracking research. In Proceedings of the 2018 acm symposium on eye tracking research & applications. 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. David Rudi, Peter Kiefer, and Martin Raubal. 2020. The instructor assistant system (iASSYST)-utilizing eye tracking for commercial aviation training purposes. Ergonomics 63, 1 (2020), 61–79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Paul-Edouard Sarlin, Daniel DeTone, Tomasz Malisiewicz, and Andrew Rabinovich. 2020. SuperGlue: Learning Feature Matching with Graph Neural Networks. In CVPR. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.11763Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Brook Shiferaw, Luke Downey, and David Crewther. 2019. A review of gaze entropy as a measure of visual scanning efficiency. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 96 (2019), 353–366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Moritz Stolte, Benedikt Gollan, and Ulrich Ansorge. 2020. Tracking visual search demands and memory load through pupil dilation. Journal of Vision 20, 6 (2020), 21–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Gal Ziv. 2016. Gaze behavior and visual attention: A review of eye tracking studies in aviation. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 26, 3-4 (2016), 75–104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Modeling Behavior, Perception, and Cognition of Pilots in a Real-time Training Assistance Application

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            PETRA '23: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
            July 2023
            797 pages
            ISBN:9798400700699
            DOI:10.1145/3594806

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 10 August 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format