skip to main content
10.1145/3594806.3596542acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fostering websites accessibility: A case study on the use of the Large Language Models ChatGPT for automatic remediation

Published:10 August 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The use of automated accessibility testing tools remains a common practice for evaluating web accessibility. However, the results obtained from these tools may not always provide a comprehensive and complete view of a site's accessibility status. The main purpose of this study is to improve web accessibility by automatically remediating non-accessible ones using Large Language Models (LLM), particularly ChatGPT. The effectiveness of the used model in detecting and remediating accessibility issues to ensure compliance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.1) is also discussed. By using ChatGPT as a remediation tool, this study investigates the potential of LLM in improving web accessibility. In the case study, two websites that did not adhere to the WCAG 2.1 guidelines were selected as the primary experimental subjects for the study. These websites were assessed using the web accessibility evaluation tool, WAVE, to detect accessibility issues. The identified issues served then as the basis for remediation using ChatGPT. The effectiveness of the used advanced language model as a web accessibility remediation tool was evaluated by comparing its findings with those obtained from manual accessibility testing. The results of this comparison have significant implications for stakeholders involved in achieving WCAG compliance and contribute to the development of more accessible online platforms for individuals with disabilities.

References

  1. I. Abu Doush, K. Sultan, M. A. Al-Betar, Z. Almeraj, Z. A. A. Alyasseri, and M. A. Awadallah, “Web accessibility automatic evaluation tools: to what extent can they be automated?,” CCF Trans. Pervasive Comp. Interact., Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s42486-023-00127-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Brophy and J. Craven, “Web accessibility,” Library trends, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 950–972, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/ (accessed Mar. 15, 2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. H. Y. Abuaddous, M. Z. Jali, and N. Basir, “Web accessibility challenges,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Othman, A. Al Mutawaa, A. Al Tamimi, and M. Al Mansouri, “Assessing the Readiness of Government and Semi-Government Institutions in Qatar for Inclusive and Sustainable ICT Accessibility: Introducing the MARSAD Tool,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 3853, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. A. N. Al Jabor, F. Adnan, M. Park, and A. Othman, “Mada Web Accessibility Monitor Tool,” in 2021 8th International Conference on ICT & Accessibility (ICTA), Dec. 2021, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICTA54582.2021.9809423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. “Introducing ChatGPT.” https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt (accessed Mar. 15, 2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. “WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools.” https://wave.webaim.org/ (accessed Mar. 15, 2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Y. Yesilada, G. Brajnik, M. Vigo, and S. Harper, “Understanding web accessibility and its drivers,” in Proceedings of the cross-disciplinary conference on web accessibility, 2012, pp. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Paris, “Website accessibility: a survey of local e-government websites and legislation in Northern Ireland,” Universal access in the information society, vol. 4, pp. 292–299, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. T. Richards and V. L. Hanson, “Web accessibility: a broader view,” in Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web, 2004, pp. 72–79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Kuzma, D. Yen, and K. Oestreicher, “Global e-government web accessibility: an empirical examination of EU, Asian and African sites,” 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Lazar, A. Dudley-Sponaugle, and K.-D. Greenidge, “Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions,” Computers in human behavior, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 269–288, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. Baidoo-Anu and L. Owusu Ansah, “Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning,” Available at SSRN 4337484, 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. “Qatar Airways.” https://www.qatarairways.com/ (accessed Mar. 19, 2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. “British Airways.” https://www.britishairways.com/ (accessed Mar. 19, 2023).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Dhouib, C. Kolski, and M. Neji, “Towards a Web-based Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for the Layered Evaluation of Interactive Adaptive Systems,” Universal Access in the Information Society, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10209-021-00850-y.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Fostering websites accessibility: A case study on the use of the Large Language Models ChatGPT for automatic remediation
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            PETRA '23: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
            July 2023
            797 pages
            ISBN:9798400700699
            DOI:10.1145/3594806

            Copyright © 2023 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 10 August 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format