skip to main content
10.1145/3594806.3596544acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Preliminary Cross-Language Investigation of Empathy in # Disability Discourse on Twitter

Published:10 August 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Existing research targeting disability on social media has looked primarily at the English language across the Global North. This has caused significant data gaps in the understanding of disability awareness and cultural mindsets elsewhere. This work presents a cross-language analysis of English and Arabic #disability tweets over a period of time. A dictionary of words was adopted to help in understanding the linguistics surrounding the term ”empathy”. The finding suggests that disability mentions in English tweets have slightly more negative empathetic emotions than those found in Arabic tweets. However, more investigations are needed to explore cultural variations towards empathy and disability, and how they differ linguistically in online conversations.

References

  1. Salma Almouzini, Asem Alageel, 2019. Detecting arabic depressed users from twitter data. Procedia Computer Science 163 (2019), 257–265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Iryna Babik and Elena S Gardner. 2021. Factors affecting the perception of disability: A developmental perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2021), 2459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Giulia Barbareschi, Mark T Carew, Elizabeth Aderonke Johnson, Norah Kopi, and Catherine Holloway. 2021. “When They See a Wheelchair, They’ve Not Even Seen Me”—Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 8 (2021), 4272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Giulia Barbareschi, Norah Shitawa Kopi, Ben Oldfrey, and Catherine Holloway. 2021. What Difference Does Tech Make? Conceptualizations of Disability and Assistive Technology among Kenyan Youth: Conceptualizations of Disability and AT. In The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Virtual Event, USA) (ASSETS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471226Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jean-Christophe Boucher, Kirsten Cornelson, Jamie L Benham, Madison M Fullerton, Theresa Tang, Cora Constantinescu, Mehdi Mourali, Robert J Oxoby, Deborah A Marshall, Hadi Hemmati, 2021. Analyzing social media to explore the attitudes and behaviors following the announcement of successful COVID-19 vaccine trials: infodemiology study. JMIR infodemiology 1, 1 (2021), e28800.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Stephen Bunbury. 2019. Unconscious bias and the medical model: How the social model may hold the key to transformative thinking about disability discrimination. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 19, 1 (2019), 26–47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. William J Chopik, Ed O’Brien, and Sara H Konrath. 2017. Differences in empathic concern and perspective taking across 63 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 48, 1 (2017), 23–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. José Manuel Errasti Pérez, Isaac Amigo Vázquez, José Manuel Villadangos Fernández, Joaquín Morís Fernández, 2018. Differences between individualist and collectivist cultures in emotional Facebook usage: Relationship with empathy, self-esteem, and narcissism. Psicothema 30, 4 (2018), 376–381. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.101Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ethan Fast, Binbin Chen, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2016. Empath: Understanding Topic Signals in Large-Scale Text. CoRR abs/1602.06979 (2016). arXiv:1602.06979http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.06979Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Barbara Fazekas, Becky Megaw, Damian Eade, and Nicholas Kronfeld. 2021. Insights into the real-life experiences of people living with epilepsy: A qualitative netnographic study. Epilepsy & Behavior 116 (2021), 107729.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sara E Green. 2003. “What do you mean ‘what’s wrong with her?’”: Stigma and the lives of families of children with disabilities. Social science & medicine 57, 8 (2003), 1361–1374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ruth A Hackett, Andrew Steptoe, Raymond P Lang, and Sarah E Jackson. 2020. Disability discrimination and well-being in the United Kingdom: a prospective cohort study. BMJ open 10, 3 (2020), e035714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Irene Lopez, Robin Quillivic, Hayley Evans, and Rosa I Arriaga. 2019. Denouncing sexual violence: A cross-language and cross-cultural analysis of# MeToo and# BalanceTonPorc. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 11747), USA, 733–743.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Margaret Mitchell, Kristy Hollingshead, and Glen Coppersmith. 2015. Quantifying the language of schizophrenia in social media. In Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Computational linguistics and clinical psychology: From linguistic signal to clinical reality. The Association for Computational Linguistics, USA, 11–20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Brigitte Rohwerder. 2018. Disability stigma in developing countries.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Katherine E RUSSO and Arianna GRASSO. 2022. Coping with dis/ableism in Twitter discourse: A corpus-based critical appraisal analysis of the Hidden Disabilities Sunflower Lanyard case.International Journal of Language Studies 16, 4 (2022), 65–94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pranav Narayanan Venkit and Shomir Wilson. 2021. Identification of Bias Against People with Disabilities in Sentiment Analysis and Toxicity Detection Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2111.13259Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Michele Zappavigna. 2011. Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society 13, 5 (2011), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810385097Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Preliminary Cross-Language Investigation of Empathy in # Disability Discourse on Twitter

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PETRA '23: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
      July 2023
      797 pages
      ISBN:9798400700699
      DOI:10.1145/3594806

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 August 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format