Self-supervised anomaly detection of medical images based on dual-module discrepancy
Article No.: 18, Pages 1 - 7
Abstract
Medical images anomaly detection plays a very important role in modern health care, which helps to improve the quality and efficiency of medical services and promote the development of human health. Due to the high cost of annotation in anomaly images and the fact that most existing methods do not fully utilize information from unlabeled images. Therefore, we propose a new reconstruction network and loss function that can better utilize unlabelled and normal images for anomaly identification. The framework used in this paper consists of two modules, each consisting of three reconstruction networks with the same architecture but different inputs. One module is trained only on normal images and is called the normal module (NM). The other module is trained on both normal images and unlabeled images, and is called the unknown module (UM). Furthermore, the internal differences of the normal module and the differences between the two modules will be used as two powerful anomaly scores, and these two anomaly scores will be refined to indicate anomalies. Experiments on four medical datasets show the state-of-the-art performance by the proposed approach.
References
[1]
Christoph Baur, Stefan Denner, Benedikt Wiestler, Nassir Navab, and Shadi Albarqouni. 2021. Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain MR images: a comparative study. Medical Image Analysis 69 (2021), 101952.
[2]
Liron Bergman, Niv Cohen, and Yedid Hoshen. 2020. Deep nearest neighbor anomaly detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.10445 (2020).
[3]
Markus M Breunig, Hans-Peter Kriegel, Raymond T Ng, and Jörg Sander. 2000. LOF: identifying density-based local outliers. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 93–104.
[4]
Yu Cai, Hao Chen, Xin Yang, Yu Zhou, and Kwang-Ting Cheng. 2023. Dual-distribution discrepancy with self-supervised refinement for anomaly detection in medical images. Medical Image Analysis 86 (2023), 102794.
[5]
Xiaoran Chen and Ender Konukoglu. 2018. Unsupervised detection of lesions in brain MRI using constrained adversarial auto-encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.04972 (2018).
[6]
Carl Doersch, Abhinav Gupta, and Alexei A Efros. 2015. Unsupervised visual representation learning by context prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 1422–1430.
[7]
Rémi Domingues, Maurizio Filippone, Pietro Michiardi, and Jihane Zouaoui. 2018. A comparative evaluation of outlier detection algorithms: Experiments and analyses. Pattern recognition 74 (2018), 406–421.
[8]
Dong Gong, Lingqiao Liu, Vuong Le, Budhaditya Saha, Moussa Reda Mansour, Svetha Venkatesh, and Anton van den Hengel. 2019. Memorizing normality to detect anomaly: Memory-augmented deep autoencoder for unsupervised anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 1705–1714.
[9]
Max Jaderberg, Karen Simonyan, Andrew Zisserman, 2015. Spatial transformer networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 28 (2015).
[10]
Wen Jin, Anthony KH Tung, Jiawei Han, and Wei Wang. 2006. Ranking outliers using symmetric neighborhood relationship. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 10th Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2006, Singapore, April 9-12, 2006. Proceedings 10. Springer, 577–593.
[11]
Longlong Jing and Yingli Tian. 2020. Self-supervised visual feature learning with deep neural networks: A survey. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 43, 11 (2020), 4037–4058.
[12]
Heewoo Jun, Rewon Child, Mark Chen, John Schulman, Aditya Ramesh, Alec Radford, and Ilya Sutskever. 2020. Distribution augmentation for generative modeling. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 5006–5019.
[13]
Longin Jan Latecki, Aleksandar Lazarevic, and Dragoljub Pokrajac. 2007. Outlier detection with kernel density functions. In International Workshop on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. Springer, 61–75.
[14]
Chun-Liang Li, Kihyuk Sohn, Jinsung Yoon, and Tomas Pfister. 2021. Cutpaste: Self-supervised learning for anomaly detection and localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 9664–9674.
[15]
Liu Li, Mai Xu, Xiaofei Wang, Lai Jiang, and Hanruo Liu. 2019. Attention based glaucoma detection: A large-scale database and CNN model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 10571–10580.
[16]
Tsung-Yi Lin, Priya Goyal, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, and Piotr Dollár. 2017. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2980–2988.
[17]
Yifan Mao, Fei-Fei Xue, Ruixuan Wang, Jianguo Zhang, Wei-Shi Zheng, and Hongmei Liu. 2020. Abnormality detection in chest x-ray images using uncertainty prediction autoencoders. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2020: 23rd International Conference, Lima, Peru, October 4–8, 2020, Proceedings, Part VI 23. Springer, 529–538.
[18]
Sergio Naval Marimont and Giacomo Tarroni. 2021. Anomaly detection through latent space restoration using vector quantized variational autoencoders. In 2021 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). IEEE, 1764–1767.
[19]
Ha Q Nguyen, Khanh Lam, Linh T Le, Hieu H Pham, Dat Q Tran, Dung B Nguyen, Dung D Le, Chi M Pham, Hang TT Tong, Diep H Dinh, 2022. VinDr-CXR: An open dataset of chest X-rays with radiologist’s annotations. Scientific Data 9, 1 (2022), 429.
[20]
Lukas Ruff, Robert Vandermeulen, Nico Goernitz, Lucas Deecke, Shoaib Ahmed Siddiqui, Alexander Binder, Emmanuel Müller, and Marius Kloft. 2018. Deep one-class classification. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 4393–4402.
[21]
Hannah M Schlüter, Jeremy Tan, Benjamin Hou, and Bernhard Kainz. 2022. Natural synthetic anomalies for self-supervised anomaly detection and localization. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 474–489.
[22]
Kihyuk Sohn, Chun-Liang Li, Jinsung Yoon, Minho Jin, and Tomas Pfister. 2020. Learning and evaluating representations for deep one-class classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.02578 (2020).
[23]
Nima Tajbakhsh, Laura Jeyaseelan, Qian Li, Jeffrey N Chiang, Zhihao Wu, and Xiaowei Ding. 2020. Embracing imperfect datasets: A review of deep learning solutions for medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis 63 (2020), 101693.
[24]
Jeremy Tan, Benjamin Hou, James Batten, Huaqi Qiu, and Bernhard Kainz. 2020. Detecting outliers with foreign patch interpolation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.04197 (2020).
[25]
Jeremy Tan, Benjamin Hou, Thomas Day, John Simpson, Daniel Rueckert, and Bernhard Kainz. 2021. Detecting outliers with poisson image interpolation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part V 24. Springer, 581–591.
[26]
Jian Tang. 2002. A robust outlier detection scheme for large data sets. In Proc. 6th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD’02).
[27]
Ke Zhang, Marcus Hutter, and Huidong Jin. 2009. A new local distance-based outlier detection approach for scattered real-world data. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 13th Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2009 Bangkok, Thailand, April 27-30, 2009 Proceedings 13. Springer, 813–822.
[28]
David Zimmerer, Simon AA Kohl, Jens Petersen, Fabian Isensee, and Klaus H Maier-Hein. 2018. Context-encoding variational autoencoder for unsupervised anomaly detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.05941 (2018).
Index Terms
- Self-supervised anomaly detection of medical images based on dual-module discrepancy
Recommendations
Autoencoding Binary Classifiers for Supervised Anomaly Detection
PRICAI 2019: Trends in Artificial IntelligenceAbstractWe propose the Autoencoding Binary Classifiers (ABC), a novel supervised anomaly detector based on the Autoencoder (AE). There are two main approaches in anomaly detection: supervised and unsupervised. The supervised approach accurately detects ...
Masked Autoencoders for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Medical Images
AbstractPathological anomalies exhibit diverse appearances in medical imaging, making it difficult to collect and annotate a representative amount of data required to train deep learning models in a supervised setting. Therefore, in this work, we tackle ...
Self-supervised anomaly detection in computer vision and beyond: A survey and outlook
AbstractAnomaly detection (AD) plays a crucial role in various domains, including cybersecurity, finance, and healthcare, by identifying patterns or events that deviate from normal behavior. In recent years, significant progress has been made in this ...
Highlights- We present a cohesive overview of self-supervised methods for anomaly detection.
- We categorize existing self-supervised anomaly detection algorithms. their proxy tasks.
- We conduct a comprehensive performance comparison.
- We ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2023
745 pages
ISBN:9798400702051
DOI:10.1145/3595916
Copyright © 2023 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 January 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
MMAsia '23
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 59 of 204 submissions, 29%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 68Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)28
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format