skip to main content
10.1145/3596671.3598569acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiworkConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Is a Return To Office a Return To Creativity? Requiring Fixed Time In Office To Enable Brainstorms and Watercooler Talk May Not Foster Research Creativity

Published: 20 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

In the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, many professionals, including researchers, have transitioned into hybrid work. One concern arising from this transition is the cost to creativity in an environment of variable co-presence. We interviewed 24 researchers from several disciplines and varying levels of seniority, across 7 research labs in academia and industry about their hybrid work patterns and sources of creativity. Co-present ‘brainstorming’ and serendipitous ‘watercooler’ conversations are both often cited as arguments for mandating co-located work patterns in research organisations. Contrary to the dominant account which associates co-presence with increased creativity, we find that the flexibility of hybrid work, and carefully managed co-present interactions punctuating a regime of focused individual work, is the main catalyst of creativity. We find that the ‘problem-oriented discussion’ over time is a more powerful pattern for researcher collaboration than the ‘brainstorm’, that these discussions benefit greatly from the freedom to choose work locations afforded by hybrid work. We also find that serendipitous ‘watercooler’ conversations, while reported as valuable for collegiality, are reported as less valued for their contribution to creativity. We suggest that scheduling time in office should extend temporalities beyond the weekly cadence, and that tools and timing for serendipitous productivity and serendipitous collegiality do not necessary have to be coupled.

References

[1]
Balazs Aczel, Marton Kovacs, Tanja Van Der Lippe, and Barnabas Szaszi. 2021. Researchers working from home: Benefits and challenges. PloS one 16, 3 (2021), e0249127.
[2]
Sönke Ahrens. 2022. How to take smart notes: One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking (2 ed.). Sönke Ahrens.
[3]
Hosam Al-Samarraie and Shuhaila Hurmuzan. 2018. A review of brainstorming techniques in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity 27 (March 2018), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.002
[4]
Teresa Amabile and Stanley S Gryskiewicz. 1987. Creativity in the R&D laboratory. Center for Creative Leadership.
[5]
Andy Jassy. 2023. Update from Andy Jassy on Amazon’s return to office plans. https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/company-news/andy-jassy-update-on-amazon-return-to-office
[6]
Atlassian. 2023. Team Anywhere: Distributed Workforce. https://www.atlassian.com/practices/use-cases/team-anywhere
[7]
Abdul Ghafoor Awan and M Tafique Tahir. 2015. Impact of working environment on employee’s productivity: A case study of Banks and Insurance Companies in Pakistan. European Journal of Business and Management 7, 1 (2015), 329–345.
[8]
Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2021. Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior 2, 1 (Feb. 2021). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
[9]
Richard Banfield, C Todd Lombardo, and Trace Wax. 2015. Design sprint: A practical guidebook for building great digital products. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
[10]
Gemma Bateman. 2009. Employee perceptions of co-worker support and its effect on job satisfaction, work stress and intention to quit.Master’s thesis.
[11]
Matthew J Beck and David A Hensher. 2022. Working from home in Australia in 2020: Positives, negatives and the potential for future benefits to transport and society. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 158 (2022), 271–284.
[12]
Rachel Bergmann, Sean Rintel, Nancy Baym, Advait Sarkar, Damian Borowiec, Priscilla Wong, and Abigail Sellen. 2022. Meeting (the) Pandemic: Videoconferencing Fatigue and Evolving Tensions of Sociality in Enterprise Video Meetings During COVID-19. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (2022), 1–37.
[13]
Rachel Bergmann, Sean Rintel, Nancy Baym, Advait Sarkar, Damian Borowiec, Priscilla Wong, and Abigail Sellen. 2022. Meeting (the) Pandemic: Videoconferencing Fatigue and Evolving Tensions of Sociality in Enterprise Video Meetings During COVID-19. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (Nov. 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-022-09451-6
[14]
Nicholas Bloom. 2021. Don’t Let Employees Pick Their WFH Days. Harvard Business Review (May 2021). https://hbr.org/2021/05/dont-let-employees-pick-their-wfh-days
[15]
Nicholas Bloom. 2021. Hybrid is the Future of Work. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR): Stanford, CA, USA (2021).
[16]
Nicholas Bloom, James Liang, John Roberts, and Zhichun Jenny Ying. 2015. Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130, 1 (2015), 165–218.
[17]
Margaret A Boden. 2004. The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Routledge.
[18]
Nathan Bos, N. Sadat Shami, Judith S. Olson, Arik Cheshin, and Ning Nan. 2004. In-group/Out-group Effects in Distributed Teams: An Experimental Simulation. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1145/1031607.1031679 event-place: Chicago, Illinois, USA.
[19]
Andriana Boudouraki, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sean Rintel. 2023. Your Mileage May Vary: Case Study of a Robotic Telepresence Pilot Roll-out for a Hybrid Knowledge Work Organisation. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 408, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3573871
[20]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.
[21]
Tim Brown 2008. Design thinking. Harvard business review 86, 6 (2008), 84.
[22]
Melanie S Brucks and Jonathan Levav. 2022. Virtual communication curbs creative idea generation. Nature 605, 7908 (2022), 108–112.
[23]
Alan Bryman. 2016. Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
[24]
Jenna Butler, Mary Czerwinski, Shamsi Iqbal, Sonia Jaffe, Kate Nowak, Emily Peloquin, and Longqi Yang. 2021. Personal Productivity and Well-being–Chapter 2 of the 2021 New Future of Work Report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.02524 (2021).
[25]
Iain Chalmers, Michael B Bracken, Ben Djulbegovic, Silvio Garattini, Jonathan Grant, A Metin Gülmezoglu, David W Howells, John PA Ioannidis, and Sandy Oliver. 2014. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. The Lancet 383, 9912 (2014), 156–165.
[26]
Matt Clancy. 2022. Innovation at the Office. https://www.newthingsunderthesun.com/pub/45tu6m6e.
[27]
Adriana Dahik, Deborah Lovich, Caroline Kreafle, Allison Bailey, Julie Kilmann, Derek Kennedy, Prateek Roongta, Felix Schuler, Leo Tomlin, and John Wenstrup. 2020. What 12,000 employees have to say about the future of remote work. Boston Consulting Group (2020).
[28]
Alan Felstead and Golo Henseke. 2017. Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well-being and work-life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment 32, 3 (2017), 195–212.
[29]
Alan Felstead and Darja Reuschke. 2021. A flash in the pan or a permanent change? The growth of homeworking during the pandemic and its effect on employee productivity in the UK. Information Technology & People (2021).
[30]
Robert S. Fish, Robert E. Kraut, and Barbara L. Chalfonte. 1990. The VideoWindow System in Informal Communication. In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work(CSCW ’90). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/99332.99335 event-place: Los Angeles, California, USA.
[31]
Frederic Lardinois. 2023. GitHub lays off 10% and goes fully remote. TechCrunch (Feb 26 2023). https://techcrunch.com/2023/02/09/github-lays-off-10-and-goes-fully-remote/
[32]
Jonas Frich. 2021. Is brainstorming a final frontier in the digitalization of design work?. In Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Demos and Posters. https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2021-p19 Accepted: 2021-05-18T10:06:09Z Publisher: European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).
[33]
Anita Füzi, Nick Clifton, and Gareth Loudon. 2014. New in-house organizational spaces that support creativity and innovation: the co-working space. In R&D Management Conference 2014. Stuttgart, Germany. https://figshare.cardiffmet.ac.uk/articles/conference_contribution/New_in-house_organizational_spaces_that_support_creativity_and_innovation_the_co-working_space/19317431/1 Publisher: Cardiff Metropolitan University.
[34]
Julia Geerts, Jan de Wit, and Alwin de Rooij. 2021. Brainstorming With a Social Robot Facilitator: Better Than Human Facilitation Due to Reduced Evaluation Apprehension?Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 (2021). https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frobt.2021.657291
[35]
Elizabeth Gerber. 2009. Using improvisation to enhance the effectiveness of brainstorming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 97–104.
[36]
Zhengya Gong, Lik-Hang Lee, Sohail Ahmed Soomro, Vijayakumar Nanjappan, and Georgi V. Georgiev. 2022. A systematic review of virtual brainstorming from the perspective of creativity: affordances, framework, and outlook. Digital Creativity 33, 2 (April 2022), 96–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2022.2064879 Publisher: Routledge.
[37]
Carlos Gonzalez Diaz, John Tang, Advait Sarkar, and Sean Rintel. 2022. Making Space for Social Time: Supporting Conversational Transitions Before, During, and After Video Meetings. In 2022 Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work(CHIWORK 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533417
[38]
Carlos Gonzalez Diaz, John Tang, Advait Sarkar, and Sean Rintel. 2022. Making Space for Social Time: Supporting Conversational Transitions Before, During, and After Video Meetings. In 2022 Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work (Durham, NH, USA) (CHIWORK 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3533406.3533417
[39]
Stephanie E Hampton and John N Parker. 2011. Collaboration and productivity in scientific synthesis. BioScience 61, 11 (2011), 900–910.
[40]
Seulkee Heo, Alisha Yee Chan, Pedro Diaz Peralta, Lan Jin, Claudia Ribeiro Pereira Nunes, and Michelle L. Bell. 2022. Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists’ productivity in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and medicine fields. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9, 1 (Dec. 2022), 434. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01466-0
[41]
Laura Mariah Herman and Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang. 2022. In the eye of the beholder: A viewer-defined conception of online visual creativity. New Media & Society (2022), 14614448221089604.
[42]
Nicole Herskowitz. 2021. Brace yourselves: Hybrid work is hard. here’s how Microsoft Teams and Office 365 can help. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2021/09/09/brace-yourselves-hybrid-work-is-hard-heres-how-microsoft-teams-and-office-365-can-help/
[43]
Peter Buell Hirsch. 2022. The hippogryphs on the 14th floor: the future of hybrid work. Journal of Business Strategy 44, 1 (Jan. 2022), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-11-2022-0191 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited.
[44]
Sonia Jaffe and Jenna Butler. 2021. What is hybrid?https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/the-new-future-of-work/articles/what-is-hybrid/
[45]
Vera John-Steiner. 2000. Creative collaboration. Oxford University Press.
[46]
Brennan Jones, Yaying Zhang, Priscilla N. Y. Wong, and Sean Rintel. 2021. Belonging There: VROOM-Ing into the Uncanny Valley of XR Telepresence. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 59 (apr 2021), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449133
[47]
Christian Klein. 2021. Pledge to Flex: The Future of Work at SAP Is 100% Flexible and Trust Based. https://news.sap.com/2021/06/pledge-to-flex-future-of-work-at-sap/
[48]
Robert Kraut, Carmen Egido, and Jolene Galegher. 1988. Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. In Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work(CSCW ’88). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/62266.62267
[49]
Robert E Kraut, Carmen Egido, and Jolene Galegher. 2014. Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations. Intellectual teamwork (2014), 163–186.
[50]
Thomas S Kuhn. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1st edn (2nd edn 1970).
[51]
Sandra Laugier. 2013. Why we need ordinary language philosophy. In Why We Need Ordinary Language Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
[52]
Sooho Lee and Barry Bozeman. 2005. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social studies of science 35, 5 (2005), 673–702.
[53]
Maria Leonardi. 2021. Water Cooler Talk — Innovation Silver Bullet or Facade?https://medium.com/management-matters/water-cooler-talk-innovation-silver-bullet-or-facade-7f1fad84de20
[54]
Paul M. Leonardi, Marleen Huysman, and Charles Steinfield. 2013. Enterprise Social Media: Definition, History, and Prospects for the Study of Social Technologies in Organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 1 (Oct. 2013), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12029
[55]
Mark D Lindner, Karina D Torralba, and Nasim A Khan. 2018. Scientific productivity: An exploratory study of metrics and incentives. PloS one 13, 4 (2018), e0195321.
[56]
Oliver Mallett, Abigail Marks, and Lila Skountridaki. 2020. Where does work belong anymore? The implications of intensive homebased working. Gender in Management: An International Journal 35, 7/8 (Jan. 2020), 657–665. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-06-2020-0173 Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited.
[57]
Lori McCay-Peet, Elaine G. Toms, and Gary Marchionini. 2017. Researching Serendipity in Digital Information Environments. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
[58]
Arthur J Miller. 2002. Einstein, Picasso: Space, Time And The Beauty That Causes Havoc: Space, Time, and the Beauty that Causes Havoc. Perseus (for Hbg).
[59]
Courtney Miller, Paige Rodeghero, Margaret-Anne Storey, Denae Ford, and Thomas Zimmermann. 2021. "How Was Your Weekend?" Software Development Teams Working From Home During COVID-19. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 43rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). 624–636. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE43902.2021.00064 ISSN: 1558-1225.
[60]
Alfonso Montuori and Ronald E Purser. 1995. Deconstructing the lone genius myth: Toward a contextual view of creativity. Journal of Humanistic psychology 35, 3 (1995), 69–112.
[61]
Brian Mullen, Craig Johnson, and Eduardo Salas. 1991. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and applied social psychology 12, 1 (1991), 3–23.
[62]
Carl J Neumann. 2007. Fostering creativity: A model for developing a culture of collective creativity in science. EMBO reports 8, 3 (2007), 202–206.
[63]
Thomas Neumayr, Mirjam Augstein, and Bettina Kubicek. 2022. Territoriality in Hybrid Collaboration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 332:1–332:37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555224
[64]
Cal Newport. 2019. Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. Penguin.
[65]
Ekaterina Olshannikova, Thomas Olsson, Jukka Huhtamäki, Susanna Paasovaara, and Hannu Kärkkäinen. 2020. From Chance to Serendipity: Knowledge Workers’ Experiences of Serendipitous Social Encounters. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2020 (Feb. 2020), e1827107. Publisher: Hindawi.
[66]
Alex F Osborn. 1953. Applied imagination.Charles Scribner, New York (1953).
[67]
Pedro R. Palos-Sanchez, Pedro Baena-Luna, and Daniel Silva-O’Connor. 2022. Exploring employees’ beliefs regarding the potential benefits of virtual worlds for group cohesion: gather town. Multimedia Tools and Applications (Dec. 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-14308-7
[68]
Alex Soojung-Kim Pang. 2016. Rest: Why you get more done when you work less. Basic Books.
[69]
Jane Parry, Zoe Young, Stephan Bevan, Michail Veliziotis, Yehuda Baruch, Mina Beigi, Zofia Bajorek, Emma Salter, and Chira Tochia. 2021. Working from Home under COVID-19 lockdown: Transitions and tensions. (2021).
[70]
Michael Quinn Patton. 2014. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
[71]
Paul B. Paulus and Jared B. Kenworthy. 2019. Effective Brainstorming. In The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation, Paul B. Paulus and Bernard A. Nijstad (Eds.). Oxford University Press, 287–386.
[72]
René Riedl. 2022. On the stress potential of videoconferencing: definition and root causes of Zoom fatigue. Electronic Markets 32, 1 (March 2022), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00501-3
[73]
Simone M. Ritter and Eric F. Rietzschel. 2017. Lay Theories of Creativity. In The Science of Lay Theories: How Beliefs Shape Our Cognition, Behavior, and Health, Claire M. Zedelius, Barbara C. N. Müller, and Jonathan W. Schooler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 95–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57306-9_5
[74]
Robert Root-Bernstein, Lindsay Allen, Leighanna Beach, Ragini Bhadula, Justin Fast, Chelsea Hosey, Benjamin Kremkow, Jacqueline Lapp, Kaitlin Lonc, Kendell Pawelec, 2008. Arts foster scientific success: avocations of nobel, national academy, royal society, and sigma xi members. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology 1, 2 (2008), 51–63.
[75]
Michele Rostan and Flavio Antonio Ceravolo. 2015. The internationalisation of the academy: Convergence and divergence across disciplines. European Review 23, S1 (2015), S38–S54.
[76]
Javier Ruiz-Castillo and Rodrigo Costas. 2014. The skewness of scientific productivity. Journal of informetrics 8, 4 (2014), 917–934.
[77]
Banu Saatçi, Kaya Akyüz, Sean Rintel, and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2020. (Re) Configuring Hybrid Meetings: Moving from User-Centered Design to Meeting-Centered Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 29, 6 (2020), 769–794.
[78]
Banu Saatçi, Roman Rädle, Sean Rintel, Kenton O’Hara, and Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose. 2019. Hybrid Meetings in the Modern Workplace: Stories of Success and Failure. In International Conference on Collaboration and Technology. Springer, 45–61.
[79]
Mahadev Satyanarayanan, Nigel Davies, and Nina Taft. 2022. Balancing privacy and serendipity in cyberspace. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. ACM, Tempe Arizona, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/3508396.3512873
[80]
Marthann Schulte. 2015. Distance faculty experiences: A personal perspective of benefits and detriments of telecommuting. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education 63, 1 (2015), 63–66.
[81]
Lila Skountridaki, Oliver Mallett, and Abigail Marks. 2021. Does your hybrid working dream match the reality? (2021).
[82]
Lila Skountridaki, Abigail Marks, and Oliver Mallett. 2021. Wellbeing, Work-Life Balance and the Quality of Working Life in the New World of Hybrid Work. In BSA Work, Employment and Society Conference 2021: Connectedness, Activism and Dignity at work in a Precarious Era.
[83]
Darja Smite, Nils Brede Moe, Anastasiia Tkalich, Geir Kjetil Hanssen, Kristina Nydal, Jenny Nøkleberg Sandbæk, Hedda Wasskog Aamo, Ada Olsdatter Hagaseth, Scott Aleksander Bekke, and Malin Holte. 2022. Half-Empty Offices in Flexible Work Arrangements: Why Are Employees Not Returning?. In Product-Focused Software Process Improvement(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Davide Taibi, Marco Kuhrmann, Tommi Mikkonen, Jil Klünder, and Pekka Abrahamsson (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21388-5_18
[84]
Merritt Roe Smith and Leo Marx. 1994. Does technology drive history?: The dilemma of technological determinism. Mit Press.
[85]
Lebene Richmond Soga, Yemisi Bolade-Ogunfodun, Marcello Mariani, Rita Nasr, and Benjamin Laker. 2022. Unmasking the other face of flexible working practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research 142 (2022), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.024
[86]
Jared Spataro. 2022. Introducing Microsoft Places: Turn your spaces into places. https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/microsoft-365/blog/2022/10/12/introducing-microsoft-places-turn-your-spaces-into-places/
[87]
Cath Sullivan and Suzan Lewis. 2001. Home-based telework, gender, and the synchronization of work and family: perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents. Gender, Work & Organization 8, 2 (2001), 123–145.
[88]
David R Thomas. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation 27, 2 (2006), 237–246.
[89]
Osku Torro, Henri Jalo, and Henri Pirkkalainen. 2021. Six Reasons Why Virtual Reality is a Game-Changing Computing and Communication Platform for Organizations. Commun. ACM 64, 10 (sep 2021), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3440868
[90]
Robert K Toutkoushian, Stephen R Porter, Cherry Danielson, and Paula R Hollis. 2003. Using publications counts to measure an institution’s research productivity. Research in higher education 44, 2 (2003), 121–148.
[91]
Raymond H Van Zelst and Willard A Kerr. 1951. Some correlates of technical and scientific productivity.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46, 4 (1951), 470.
[92]
Paul Villinski. 2016. Collaborative overload. Harvard Business Review (2016).
[93]
Quan-Hoang Vuong, Nancy K Napier, Tung Manh Ho, Viet Ha Nguyen, Thu-Trang Vuong, Hiep Hung Pham, and Hong Kong To Nguyen. 2019. Effects of work environment and collaboration on research productivity in Vietnamese social sciences: evidence from 2008 to 2017 scopus data. Studies in Higher Education 44, 12 (2019), 2132–2147.
[94]
Graham Wallas. 1926. The art of thought. Vol. 10. Harcourt, Brace.
[95]
Yun Wang, Ying Liu, Weiwei Cui, John Tang, Haidong Zhang, Doug Walston, and Dongmei Zhang. 2021. Returning to the office during the COVID-19 pandemic recovery: Early indicators from China. In Extended abstracts of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–6.
[96]
Warren O. Hagstrom. 1965. The Scientific Community. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Ill.
[97]
Daniel Wheatley. 2017. Employee satisfaction and use of flexible working arrangements. Work, employment and society 31, 4 (2017), 567–585.
[98]
Steve Whittaker, David Frohlich, and Owen Daly-Jones. 1994. Informal workplace communication: what is it like and how might we support it?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’94). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191726
[99]
DaJung Woo, Camille G. Endacott, and Karen K. Myers. 2023. Navigating Water Cooler Talks Without the Water Cooler: Uncertainty and Information Seeking During Remote Socialization. Management Communication Quarterly 37, 2 (May 2023), 251–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221105916 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
[100]
Longqi Yang, David Holtz, Sonia Jaffe, Siddharth Suri, Shilpi Sinha, Jeffrey Weston, Connor Joyce, Neha Shah, Kevin Sherman, Brent Hecht, 2022. The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature human behaviour 6, 1 (2022), 43–54.
[101]
Longqi Yang, Sonia Jaffe, David Holtz, Siddharth Suri, Shilpi Sinha, Jeffrey Weston, Connor Joyce, Neha Shah, Kevin Sherman, Chia-Jung Lee, 2020. How work from home affects collaboration: A large-scale study of information workers in a natural experiment during COVID-19. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.15584 (2020).

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Exploring Perspectives on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Creativity of Knowledge Work: Beyond Mechanised Plagiarism and Stochastic ParrotsProceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3596671.3597650(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023

Index Terms

  1. Is a Return To Office a Return To Creativity? Requiring Fixed Time In Office To Enable Brainstorms and Watercooler Talk May Not Foster Research Creativity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CHIWORK '23: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work
    June 2023
    164 pages
    ISBN:9798400708077
    DOI:10.1145/3596671
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 September 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. brainstorming
    2. creativity
    3. hybrid work
    4. research
    5. scheduling
    6. serendipity
    7. spontaneity

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    CHIWORK 2023

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)164
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)26
    Reflects downloads up to 10 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Exploring Perspectives on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Creativity of Knowledge Work: Beyond Mechanised Plagiarism and Stochastic ParrotsProceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction for Work10.1145/3596671.3597650(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media